For the integrated multidisciplinary approach to patient care

Return to the Southern Medical Journal

Current User S2 Access Level: -1 ()
CAN NOT ACCESS LEVEL 2
Original Article

Attitudes Toward Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Digital Age: A Survey of Practices and Attitudes among Screening-Eligible Alabamians

Allen Perkins MD, MPH, Keith Nicholls, PhD, Thomas Shaw, PhD, Gerald Liu, MD, Ehab Molokhia MD, MPH
Volume: 106 Issue: 8 August, 2013

Abstract:

Objectives: To ascertain barriers to colorectal cancer screening in an environment of changing recommendations, payment structures, and information access, and to develop strategies for overcoming these barriers by undertaking a population survey of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening knowledge and attitudes in Alabama.

Methods: An 80-item questionnaire focused on cancer screening, specifically CRC screening, was developed and pretested. A random sample of Alabama residents was generated using random-digit dial methods and interviews of 615 participants aged 50 and older were conducted in March 2012 and April 2012. Screened and unscreened groups were compared using χ2 statistics.

Results: Sixty-one percent of Alabamians who participated in this survey reported being screened for CRC, the majority (95%) of these by colonoscopy. Both screened and unscreened participants reported using the Internet for health information more often if they were younger than 65 years. Those screened often reported feeling well informed regarding the guidelines, often to have discussed CRC screening with their family physician, and often to have had other cancer screenings. All of the respondents, screened and unscreened, reported financial considerations to be the most significant barriers to screening.

Conclusions: Although educating the general population could be helpful, a physician championing screening is key. Home stool testing is underused in Alabama in part because physicians are not fully aware of its utility. As financial barriers diminish, it is important to offer multiple effective modalities when available, and insurance reform, which includes payment for preventive care, may improve screening rates.

Article:

This content is limited to qualifying members. Please click on an option below to view in full. Click here to compare all member plans.

Login

Silver/Gold members login for full access. Other members login to view purchase options.

Create a New Account

Create a new complimentary account/login to view purchase options.

Images:

This content is limited to qualifying members. Please click on an option below to view in full. Click here to compare all member plans.

Login

Silver/Gold members login for full access. Other members login to view purchase options.

Create a New Account

Create a new complimentary account/login to view purchase options.

References:

1. National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Increasing colorectal cancer screening—saving lives and saving dollars: screening 50 to 64 year olds reduces cancer costs to Medicare. http://action.acscan.org/site/DocServer/Increasing_Colorectal_Cancer_Screening_-Saving_Lives_an.pdf?docID=18927. Published September 2007. Accessed August 14, 2012.
 
2. Cancer Facts and Figures 2012. Atlanta, American Cancer Society, 2012.
 
3. Farley TA, Dalal MA, Mostashari F. Deaths preventable in the U.S. by improvements in use of clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38: 600–609.
 
4. Rim SH, Joseph DA, Steele CB, et al. Colorectal cancer screening—United States, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Surveill Summ. 2011; 60: 42–46.
 
5. Alabama Statewide Cancer Registry 2010. Alabama cancer facts and figures, 2010. http://www.adph.org/ascr/assets/2010FactsFigures.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2011.
 
6. Klabunde CN, Vernon SW, Nadel MR, et al. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care. 2005; 43: 939–944.
 
7. Berkowitz Z, Hawkins NA, Peipins LA, et al. Beliefs, risk perceptions, and gaps in knowledge as barriers to colorectal cancer screening in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008; 56: 307–314.
 
8. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149: 638–658.
 
9. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: clinical summary of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. AHRQ Publication No. 08-05124-EF-4. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf08/colocancer/colosum.htm. Published October 2008. Accessed June 24, 2013.
 
10. Chapman K, Nicholls K, Sullivan MM, et al. Colorectal cancer screening practices in Alabama: a survey of primary care physicians. J Cancer Educ. 2012; 27: 687–694.
 
11. Wolf MS, Baker DW, Makoul G. Physician-patient communication about colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22: 1493–1499.
 
12. Ling BS, Moskowitz MA, Wachs D, et al. Attitudes towards colorectal cancer screening tests. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16: 822–830.
 
13. DeBourcy AC, Lichtenberger S, Felton S, et al. Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23: 169–174.
 
14. Shokar NK, Carlson CA, Weller SC. Informed decision making changes test preferences for colorectal cancer in a diverse population. Ann Fam Med. 2010; 8: 141–150.
 
15. Nguyen TT, Love MB, Liang C, et al. A pilot study of lay health worker outreach and colorectal cancer screening among Chinese Americans. J Cancer Educ. 2010; 25: 405–412.
 
16. Makoul G, Cameron KA, Baker DW, et al. A multimedia patient education program on colorectal cancer screening increases knowledge and willingness to consider screening among Hispanic/Latino patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 76: 220–226.
 
17. Hassinger JP, Holubar SD, Pendlimari R, et al. Effectiveness of a multimedia-based educational intervention for improving colon cancer literacy in screening colonoscopy patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010; 53: 1301–1307.
 
18. Senore C, Malila N, Minozzi S, et al. How to enhance physician and public acceptance and utilisation of colon cancer screening recommendations. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010; 24: 509–520.
 
18a. US Census Bureau. Annual estimates of the resident population for selected age groups by sex for the United States, States, Counties, and Puerto Rico Commonwealth and Municipios: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2012. http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk.Published June 2013. Accessed June 24, 2013.
 
19. Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2008; 19: 339–359.
 
20. Ling BS, Schoen RE, Trauth JM, et al. Physicians encouraging colorectal screening, a randomized controlled trial of enhanced office and patient management on compliance with colorectal cancer screening. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 47–55.
 
21. Bramble JD, Galt KA, Siracuse MV, et al. The relationship between physician practice characteristics and physician adoption of electronic health records. Health Care Manage Rev. 2010; 35: 55–64.
 
22. Sarfaty M, Wender R, Smith R. Promoting cancer screening within the patient centered medical home. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011; 61: 397–408.
 
23. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 501–504.
 
24. Haug U, Brenner H. New stool tests for colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review focusing on performance characteristics and practicalness. Int J Cancer. 2005; 117: 169–176.
 
25. Gennarelli M, Jandorf L, Cromwell C, et al. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: inadequate knowledge by physicians. Mt Sinai J Med. 2005; 72: 36–44.
 
26. National Program of Cancer Registries. United States cancer statistics (USCS). 1999–2009 cancer incidence and mortality data. http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/uscs. Accessed June 17, 2013.

CME:

Portions of this issue may be available for CME credit. Please email education@sma.org for a complete listing of current Southern Medical Journal activities, as well as other SMA educational offerings.

This content is limited to qualifying members. Please click on an option below to view in full. Click here to compare all member plans.

Login

Silver/Gold members login for full access. Other members login to view purchase options.

Create a New Account

Create a new complimentary account/login to view purchase options.

This content is limited to qualifying members. Please click on an option below to view in full. Click here to compare all member plans.

Login

Silver/Gold members login for full access. Other members login to view purchase options.

Create a New Account

Create a new complimentary account/login to view purchase options.

Permissions