Original Article
Long-Term Impact of Environmental Public Health Disaster on Health System Performance: Experiences from the Graniteville, South Carolina Chlorine Spill
Abstract
Objectives: In the aftermath of an environmental public health disaster (EPHD) a healthcare system may be the least equipped entity to respond. Preventable visits for ambulatory care–sensitive conditions (ACSCs) may be used as a population-based indicator to monitor health system access postdisaster. The objective of this study was to examine whether ACSC rates among vulnerable subpopulations are sensitive to the impact of a disaster.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis on the 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, South Carolina using a Medicaid claims database. Poisson regression was used to calculate change in monthly ACSC visits at the disaster site in the postdisaster period compared with the predisaster period after adjusting for parallel changes in a control group.
Results: The adjusted rate of a predisaster ACSC hospital visit for the direct group was 1.68 times the rate for the control group (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47–1.93), whereas the adjusted ACSC hospital rate postdisaster for the direct group was 3.10 times the rate for the control group (95% CI 1.97–5.18). For ED ACSC visits, the adjusted rate among those directly affected predisaster were 1.82 times the rate for the control group (95% CI 1.61–2.08), whereas the adjusted ACSC rate postdisaster was 2.81 times the rate for the control group (95% CI 1.92–5.17).
Conclusions: Results revealed that an increased demand on the health system altered health services delivery for vulnerable populations directly affected by a disaster. Preventable visits for ACSCs may advance public health practice by identifying healthcare disparities during disaster recovery.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. de Ville de Goyet C, Marti RZ, Osorio C. Natural disaster mitigation and relief, in Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, et al. eds: Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. 2nd ed. Washington, DC, World Bank, 2006.
2. Aronoff M, Gunter V. Defining disaster: local constructions for recovery in the aftermath of chemical contamination. Soc Probl 1992; 39: 345–365.
3. Baum A, Fleming I. Implications of psychological research on stress and technological accidents. Am Psychol 1993; 48: 665–672.
4. Edwards MLK. An interdisciplinary perspective on disasters and stress: the promise of an ecological framework. Sociol Forum 1998; 13: 115–132.
5. Kirk MA, Deaton ML. Bringing order out of chaos: effective strategies for medical response to mass chemical exposure. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2007; 25: 527–548.
6. Mokdad AH, Mensah GA, Posner SF, et al. When chronic conditions become acute: prevention and control of chronic diseases and adverse health outcomes during natural disasters. Prev Chronic Dis2005; 2 (Spec no. A04).
7. Franco C, Toner E, Waldhorn R, et al. The national disaster medical system: past, present, and suggestions for the future. Biosecur Bioterror 2007; 5: 319–325.
8. Kleinpeter MA. Rebuilding New Orleans and the Gulf Coast—lessons learned to strengthen nation’s healthcare. Response to Ferdinand’s “public health and Hurricane Katrina.” J Natl Med Assoc 2006; 98: 814–816.
9. Blaikie PT, Cannon ID, Wisner B. At Risk: Natural Hazards, Peoples’ Vulnerability and Disasters. London, Routledge, 1984.
10. Bayard D. Haiti earthquake relief, phase two—long-term needs and local resources. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1858–1861.
11. Brodie M, Weltzien E, Altman D, et al. Experiences of hurricane Katrina evacuees in Houston shelters: implications for future planning. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 1402–1408.
12. Dorn T, Yzermans CJ, Kerssens JJ, et al. Disaster and subsequent healthcare utilization: a longitudinal study among victims, their family members, and control subjects. Med Care 2006; 44: 581–589.
13. Kates RW, Colten CE, Laska S, et al. Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: a research perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 14653–14660.
14. Kim H, Han SB, Kim JH, et al. Post-Nargis medical care: experience of a Korean disaster relief team in Myanmar after the cyclone. Eur J Emerg Med 2010; 17: 37–41.
15. Noji EK. The public health consequences of disasters. Prehosp Disaster Med 2000; 15: 147–157.
16. Shover H. The disaster response system: unanswered questions. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2007; 43: 3.
17. Axelrod C, Killam PP, Gaston MH, et al. Primary health care and the Midwest flood disaster. Public Health Rep 1994; 109: 601–605.
18. Berggren RE, Curiel TJ. After the storm—health care infrastructure in post-Katrina New Orleans. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1549–1552.
19. Jhung MA, Shehab N, Rohr-Allegrini C, et al. Chronic disease and disasters medication demands of Hurricane Katrina evacuees. Am J Prev Med 2007; 33: 207–210.
20. Billings J. Using administrative data to monitor access, identify disparities, and assess performance of the safety net. http://archive.ahrq.gov/data/safetynet/billings.htm. Published 2003. Accessed March 10, 2011.
21. Billings J, Anderson GM, Newman LS. Recent finding on preventable hospitalizations. Health Aff (Millwood) 1996; 15: 239–249.
22. Billings J, Parikh N, Miljanovich T. Emergency department use: the New York story. Issue brief. Commonw Fund 2000; 434: 1–12.
23. Billings J, Zeitel L, Lukomnik J, et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City. Health Aff (Millwood) 1993; 12: 162–173.
24. Basu J, Friedman B, Burstin H. Primary care, HMO enrollment, and hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: a new approach. Med Care 2002; 40: 1260–1269.
25. Gill JM, Mainous AG 3rd, Nsereko M. Does having an outpatient visit after hospital discharge reduce the likelihood of readmission? Del Med J 2003; 75: 291–298.
26. Shi L, Samuels ME, Pease M, et al. Patient characteristics associated with hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions in South Carolina. South Med J 1999; 92: 989–998.
27. Basu J, Friedman B, Burstin H. Managed care and preventable hospitalization among Medicaid adults. Health Serv Res 2004; 39: 489–510.
28. Garg A, Probst JC, Sease T, et al. Potentially preventable care: ambulatory care-sensitive pediatric hospitalizations in South Carolina in 1998. South Med J 2003; 96: 850–858.
29. Saha S, Solotaroff R, Oster A, et al. Are preventable hospitalizations sensitive to changes in access to primary care? The case of the Oregon Health Plan. Med Care 2007; 45: 712–719.
30. Brown AD, Goldacre MJ, Hicks N, et al. Hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions: a method for comparative access and quality studies using routinely collected statistics. Can J Public Health 2001; 92: 155–159.
31. Laditka JN, Laditka SB. Race, ethnicity and hospitalization for six chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions in the USA. Ethn Health 2006; 11: 247–263.
32. Pappas G, Hadden WC, Kozak LJ, et al. Potentially avoidable hospitalizations: inequalities in rates between US socioeconomic groups. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 811–816.
33. Trivedi AN, Zaslavsky AM, Schneider EC, et al. Trends in the quality of care and racial disparities in Medicare managed care. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 692–700.
34. Agabiti N, Pirani M, Schifano P, et al. Income level and chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions in adults: a multicity population-based study in Italy. BMC Public Health 2009; 9: 457.
35. Roos LL, Walld R, Uhanova J, et al. Physician visits, hospitalizations, and socioeconomic status: ambulatory care sensitive conditions in a Canadian setting. Health Serv Res 2005; 40: 1167–1185.
36. Booth GL, Hux JE. Relationship between avoidable hospitalizations for diabetes mellitus and income level. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 101–106.
37. Zhang W, Mueller KJ, Chen LW. Uninsured hospitalizations: rural and urban differences. J Rural Health 2008; 24: 194–202.
38. Culler SD, Parchman ML, Przybylski M. Factors related to potentially preventable hospitalisations among elderly. Med Care 1998; 36: 804–817.
39. Basu J, Friedman B. Preventable illness and out-of-area travel of children in New York counties. Health Econ 2001; 10: 67–78.
40. Chen LW, Zhang W, Sun J, et al. Regional variation in rural hospital charges due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Rural Policy Brief 2007; (PB2007-5): 1–4.
41. Chen LW, Zhang W, Sun J, et al. National rural hospital charges due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Rural Policy Brief 2007; (PB2007-4): 1–4.
42. Laditka JN, Laditka SB, Probst JC. More may be better: evidence of a negative relationship between physician supply and hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Health Serv Res 2005; 40: 1148–1166.
43. Northridge ME, Meyer IH, Dunn L. Overlooked and underserved in Harlem: a population-based survey of adults with asthma. Environ Health Perspect 2002; 110 (Suppl 2): 217–220.
44. Tang N, Stein J, Hsia RY, et al. Trends and characteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997–2007. JAMA 2010; 304: 664–670.
45. Zhang W, Mueller KJ, Chen LW, et al. The role of rural health clinics in hospitalization due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions: a study in Nebraska. J Rural Health 2006; 22: 220–223.
46. Wang F, Luo W. Assessing spatial and nonspatial factors for healthcare access: towards an integrated approach to defining health professional shortage areas. Health Place 2005; 11: 131–146.
47. Schreiber S, Zielinski T. The meaning of ambulatory care sensitive admissions: urban and rural perspectives. J Rural Health 1997; 13: 276–284.
48. Agency for Healthcare Research andQuality. AHRQ Quality Indicators—Guide to Prevention Quality Indicators: Hospital Admission for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions. Revision 4. Rockville, MD, AHRQ, 2004.
49. Ansari Z, Laditka JN, Laditka SB. Access to health care and hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Med Care Res Rev 2006; 63: 719–741.
50. Caminal J, Starfield B, Sanchez E, et al. The role of primary care in preventing ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Eur J Public Health 2004; 14: 246–251.
51. Falik M, Needleman J, Wells BL, et al. Ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations and emergency visits: experiences of Medicaid patients using federally qualified health centers. Med Care 2001; 39: 551–561.
52. Bindman AB, Chattopadhyay A, Auerback GM. Medicaid re-enrollment policies and children’s risk of hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Med Care 2008; 46: 1049–1054.
53. Bindman AB, Chattopadhyay A, Auerback GM. Interruptions in Medicaid coverage and risk for hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149: 854–860.
54. Gill JM. Can hospitalizations be avoided by having a regular source of care? Fam Med 1997; 29: 166–171.
55. Gill JM, Mainous AG 3rd. The role of provider continuity in preventing hospitalizations. Arch Fam Med 1998; 7: 352–357.
56. Steiner JF, Braun PA, Melinkovich P, et al. Primary-care visits and hospitalizations for ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions in an inner-city health care system. Ambul Pediatr 2003; 3: 324–328.
57. Kim J, Norton EC, Stearns SC. Transportation brokerage services and Medicaid beneficiaries’ access to care. Health Serv Res 2009; 44: 145–161.
58. Powe NR, Weiner JP, Starfield B, et al. Systemwide provider performance in a Medicaid program. Profiling the care of patients with chronic illnesses. Med Care 1996; 34: 798–810.
59. Friedman B, Basu J. Health insurance, primary care, and preventable hospitalization of children in a large state. Am J Manag Care 2001; 7: 473–481.
60. Hoffman C, Sered SS. Threadbare: Holes in America’s Health Care Safety Net. Menlo Park, CA, Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, 2005.
61. Laditka JN, Laditka SB. Insurance status and access to primary health care:disparate outcomes for potentially preventable hospitalization. J Health Soc Policy 2004; 19: 81–100.
62. Oster A, Bindman AB. Emergency department visits for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: insights into preventable hospitalizations. Med Care 2003; 41: 198–207.
63. Pan W. Akaike’s information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics 2001; 57: 120–125.
64. Manley WG, Furbee PM, Coben JH, et al. Realities of disaster preparedness in rural hospitals. Disaster Manag Response 2006; 4: 80–87.
65. Gursky EA. Hometown Hospitals: The Weakest Link? Bioterrorism Readiness in America’s Rural Hospitals. Washington, DC, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, 2004.
66. Schur CL. Understanding the Role of the Rural Hospital Emergency Department in Responding to Bioterrorist Attacks and Other Emergencies: A Review of the Literature and Guide to the Issues. Bethesda, MD, National Opinion Research Center of the University of Chicago Walsh Center for Rural Health Analysis, 2004.
