Original Article

Making Sense of State Health Data: The Case of Kentucky

Authors: Julia F. Costich, JD, PhD

Abstract

Objective: State health rankings present oversimplified and potentially damaging accounts of health status. Using the example of Kentucky, this article illustrates the realities masked by rankings that use averages and fail to account for social determinants of health.


Methods: Findings from a range of publicly available data are combined to shed light on factors that influence or are associated with health status indicators, including demographic data, health services utilization, health system elements, poverty, and educational attainment.


Results: Despite its low overall performance, Kentucky includes counties with health status that is equal to the highest-ranking states. Poverty and loss of healthy, working-age populations are closely associated with low health status, as are low rates of high school graduation.


Conclusions: Rankings that average health status indicators across widely diverse areas may yield findings that are only marginally relevant for health policy development. A high burden of morbidity pulls resources from population health to high-cost health services, challenging the viability of long-range initiatives; however, a comprehensive approach to health status improvement will be necessary to bring more southern US states like Kentucky into higher-ranking positions.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. United Health Foundation. America’s health rankings. http://www.americashealthrankings.org. Accessed November 8, 2011.
 
2. Mobilizing Action Toward Community Health (MATCH). County health rankings. www.countyhealthrankings.org. Accessed November 8, 2011.
 
3. Booske BC, Rohan AMK, Kindig DA, et al. Grading and reporting health and health disparities. Prev Chronic Dis 2010; 7: 1–9.
 
4. Friedman LS. America’s Health Rankings: an example of junk science. South Med J 2007; 100: 913–914.
 
5. Ham SA, Levin S, Zlot AI, et al. Ranking of cities according to public health criteria: pitfalls and opportunities. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 546–549.
 
6. Remington PL, Booske BC. Measuring the health of communities—how and why? J Public Health Manage Pract 2011; 17: 397–400.
 
7. Kentucky Institute of Medicine. The health of Kentucky a county assessment.http://www.kyiom.org/assessment.html. Published 2007. Accessed November 8, 2011.
 
8. Lindstrom M. Social capital and health-related behaviors. In: Kawachi I, Subramanian SV, Kim D (eds): Social Capital and Health. New York, Springer; 2007.
 
9. Secretary’s Advisory Committee on National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Objectives for 2020: phase I report recommendations for the framework and format of Healthy People 2020. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/about/advisory/default.aspx. Accessed November 8, 2011.
 
10. Hjalmarson D, Johnson L. Eastern Kentucky school-age population declines, aging population rises. http://www.kentucky.com/2011/05/05/1730591/census-eastern-kentucky-school.html. Published May 5, 2011. Accessed June 8, 2012.
 
11. Bilheimer LT. Evaluating metrics to improve population health. Prev Chronic Dis 2010; 7: A69.
 
12. Kentucky Institute of Medicine. Comprehensive statewide physician workforce study. www.kyiom.org/KMAWorkforceReport9-24-07.html. Accessed June 8, 2012.
 
13. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Healthcare Quality Report. Kentucky data. http://statesnapshots.ahrq.gov/snaps10. Accessed June 2, 2011.
 
14. Commonwealth Fund. Securing a healthy future: the Commonwealth Fund state scorecard on child health system performance, 2011. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Publications/Fund-Reports/2011/Feb/State-Scorecard-Child-Health.aspx?page=all. Accessed June 8, 2012.
 
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC WONDER. wonder.cdc.gov. Accessed June 8, 2012.
 
16. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. Understanding of the efficiency and effectiveness of the health care system. www.dartmouthatlas.org. Accessed June 8, 2012.
 
17. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser health facts. http://www.statehealthfacts.org. Accessed June 8, 2012.
 
18. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey. www.cdc.gov/brfss. Accessed June 8, 2012.
 
19. Hacker WD. Public health and prematurity prevention: healthy babies are worth the wait. Paper presented at: Association of State and Territorial Health Officers meeting; October 19–22, 2010; Colorado Springs, CO.
 
20. Kentucky Department for Public Health. Kentucky Youth Tobacco Survey. http://chfs.ky.gov/dph/mch/hp/tobaccodata.htm. Accessed July 17, 2012.
 
21. Kentucky Department for Medicaid Services. Medicaid tobacco cessation program. http://chfs.ky.gov/dms/TobaccoCessation.htm. Accessed July 17, 2012.
 
22. Cross A. Learning to keep stereotypes at bay. Quill 2009; 97: 31.
 
23. Kingsolver B, Hopp SL, Kingsolver C. Animal, Vegetable, Miracle: A Year of Food Life. New York, HarperCollins; 2008.
 
24. McKie J, Richardson J. The rule of rescue. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56: 2407–2419.