Original Article
Assessing Mentorship Experiences of Faculty at a Military Academic Center: Challenge and Opportunity
Abstract
Objectives: Mentor relationships are a key component of professional development within academic medicine. To date, there are no investigations into the prevalence and effects of mentor relationships within military academic medicine. This quality improvement initiative aimed to establish the prevalence and effects of mentorship, including whether sex differences exist among faculty at a military academic center, the San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, and identify opportunities to improve faculty development efforts for mentorship to benefit faculty at this institution.Methods: A 17-item survey was developed using an iterative process. Using the SurveyMonkey platform, the survey was distributed to each faculty member within the 33 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited programs.
Results: A total of 104 responses (26%) were received from 393 total faculty members, including 48 Air Force, 45 Army, 3 Navy, and 8 Contractor/Government Service respondents. Thirty-four respondents were women (33%) and 70 were men (67%). Only 42% of faculty reported currently having a mentor. Thirty-nine respondents (38%; 44% men and 27% women) received formal mentorship at their first staff physician position after residency training. Mentorship helped respondents the most in the areas of clinical skills, understanding departmental/institutional culture, professionalism/officership, academic promotion/advancement, and clarification of priorities/goals. When asked whether more effective mentorship would affect their own decision to remain on active-duty military service, 14% responded “yes” and 28% responded “possibly.”
Conclusions: Increased mentorship has the potential to positively affect career development in military academic military medicine. Results from this study affirm previous reports that effective mentorship potentially represents a powerful tool for faculty retention. Future study should include other military medical academic centers to assess the generalizability of these results across US military medicine.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Kashiwagi DT, Varkey P, Cook DA. Mentoring programs for physicians in academic medicine: a systematic review. Acad Med 2013;88:1029-1037.
2. Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusić A. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA 2006;296:1103-1115.
3. Jackson VA, Palepu A, Szalacha L, et al. “Having the right chemistry”: a qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Acad Med 2003;78:328-334.
4. Edmunds LD, Ovseiko PV, Shepperd S, et al. Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence. Lancet 2016;388:2948-2958.
5. Lewellen-Williams C, Johnson VA, Deloney LA, et al. The POD: a new model for mentoring underrepresented minority faculty. Acad Med 2006;81:275-279.
6. Benson CA, Morahan PS, Sachdeva AK, et al. Effective faculty preceptoring and mentoring during reorganization of an academic medical center. Med Teach 2002;24:550-557.
7. Pololi LH, Knight SM, Dennis K, et al. Helping medical school faculty realize their dreams: an innovative, collaborative mentoring program. Acad Med 2002;77:377-384.
8. Green CB. Air force medical service-trusted care anywhere. http://www.airforcemedicine.af.mil/News/Article/426878/air-force-medical-service-trusted-care-anywhere. Published March 29, 2010. Accessed February 23, 2018.
9. Salerno S, Cash B, Cranston M, et al. Perceptions of current and recent military internal medicine residents on operational medicine, managed care, graduate medical education, and continued military service. Mil Med 1998;163:392-397.
10. Jones WS, Yun HC. Air Force academic medicine: a climate survey. Mil Med 2011;176:1388-1394.
11. Dutta R, Hawkes SL, Kuipers E, et al. One year outcomes of a mentoring scheme for female academics: a pilot study at the Institute of Psychiatry, King’ College London. BMC Med Educ 2011;11:13.
12. Welch JL, Jimenez HL, Walthall J, et al. The women in emergency medicine mentoring program: an innovative approach to mentoring. J Grad Med Educ 2012;4:362-366.
13. Varkey P, Jatoi A, Williams A, et al. The positive impact of a facilitated peer mentoring program on academic skills of women faculty. BMC Med Educ 2012;12:14.
14. Air Force Medical Service. Leadership course promotes diversity, leadership among female physicians. http://www.airforcemedicine.af.mil/News/Article/707315/leadership-course-promotes-diversity-leadership-among-female-physicians. Published March 29, 2016. Accessed February 13, 2017.
15. Tracy EE, Jagsi R, Starr R, et al. Outcomes of a pilot faculty mentoring program. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1846-1850.
16. Mark S, Link H, Morahan PS, et al. Innovative mentoring programs to promote gender equity in academic medicine. Acad Med 2001;76:39-42.
17. Pololi L, Knight S. Mentoring faculty in academic medicine. A new paradigm? J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:866-870.
18. Straus SE, Chatur F, Taylor M. Issues in the mentor-mentee relationship in academic medicine: a qualitative study. Acad Med 2009;84:135-139.
