Spirituality/Medicine Interface Project

Helping as Healing Among Recovering Alcoholics

Authors: Sarah E. Zemore, PhD

Abstract

The importance of helping others is recognized in most major religions. A famous example in Christianity is the Golden Rule (Matthew 7:12), Jesus’ dictum that “Therefore all that you wish men to do unto you, even so you do also to them.” Judaic scriptures maintain that Jewish people have an obligation of tzedakah (both “charity” and “righteousness”) that supersedes any other positive precept,1 and the third of the Five Pillars of Islam is zakat (“almsgiving”).2 Buddhists value right action, loving-kindness (wishing for the happiness of all), compassion (wishing others freedom from suffering), and equanimity (valuing all beings equally).3,4 Consistent with this emphasis, studies conducted in America have found that greater helping is related to higher self-reported spirituality5 and affiliation with a church group or church attendance.6,7 Hence, helping others could be understood as the behavioral expression of a spiritual orientation.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Elcott D. A Sacred Journey: The Jewish Quest for a Perfect World Northvale, Jason Aronson Inc., 1995.
 
2. Esposito JL. Islam: The Straight Path. New York, Oxford University Press, Inc., 1988.
 
3. Snelling J. The Buddhist Handbook. Rochester, Inner Traditions International, Ltd., 1991.
 
4. The Buddha and His Teachings, Crystal Mirror Ten. Berkley, Dharma Publishing, 1995.
 
5. Zemore SE, Kaskutas LA. Helping, spirituality and Alcoholics Anonymous in recovery. J Stud Alcohol 2004;65:383–391.
 
6. Jackson EF, Bachmeier MD, Wood JR, et al. Volunteering and charitable giving: do religious and associational ties promote helping behavior? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 1995;24:59–78.
 
7. Thoits PA, Hewitt LN. Volunteer work and well-being. J Health Soc Behav 2001;42:115–131.
 
8. Dulin P, Hill RD, Anderson J, et al. Altruism as a predictor of life satisfaction in a sample of low-income older adult service providers. J Ment Health Aging 2001;7:349–360.
 
9. Rietschlin J. Voluntary association membership and psychological distress. J Health Soc Behav 1998;39:348–355.
 
10. Van Willigen M. Doing good, feeling better: the effect of voluntary association membership on individual well-being. American Sociological Association, 1998.
 
11. Moen P, Dempster-McClain D, Williams RM Social integration and longevity: an event history analysis of women’s roles and resilience. Am Sociol Rev 1989;54:635–647.
 
12. Moen P, Dempster-McClain D, Williams RM Successful aging: a life-course perspective on women’s multiple roles and health. AJS 1992;97:1612–1638.
 
13. Young FW, Glasgow N. Voluntary social participation and health. Res Aging 1998;20:339–362.
 
14. Magura S, Laudet AB, Mahmood D, et al. Role of self-help processes in achieving abstinence among dually diagnosed persons. Addict Behav 2003;28:399–413.
 
15. Emrick CD, Lassen CL, Edwards MT. Nonprofessional peers as therapeutic agents. In: Gurman AS, Razin AM, eds. Effective Psychotherapy: A Handbook of Research, 2nd ed. Elmsford, Pergamon, 1977, pp 120–161.
 
16. Sheeren M. The relationship between relapse and involvement in alcoholics anonymous. J Stud Alcohol 1988;49:104–106.
 
17. Cross GM, Morgan CW, Mooney AJ 3rd, et al. Alcoholism treatment: a ten-year follow-up study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1990;14:169–173.
 
18. Crape BL, Latkin CA, Laris AS, et al. The effects of sponsorship in 12-step treatment of injection drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002;65:291–301.
 
19. Pagano ME, Friend KB, Tonigan JS, et al. Helping other alcoholics in alcoholics anonymous and drinking outcomes: findings from project MATCH. J Stud Alcohol 2004;65:766–773.
 
20. Zemore SE, Kaskutas LA, Ammon LN. In 12-step groups, helping helps the helper. Addiction 2004;99:1015–1023.
 
21. Zemore SE, Kaskutas LA. Peer helping and 12-step involvement in day hospital and residential programs. Berkeley, Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 2006.
 
22. Pagano ME, Phillips KA, Stout RL, et al. Impact of helping behaviors on the course of substance use disorders in individuals with body dysmorphic disorder. J Stud Alcohol and Drugs. In press.
 
23. White BJ, Madara EJ, Klem N. Self-help Group Sourcebook Online Denville, American Self-help Group Clearinghouse, Behavioral Health Center, Saint Clare’s Health Services; 2006. Available at: http://mentalhelp.net/selfhelp. Accessed June 22, 2006.
 
24. Riessman F. How does self-help work? Soc Policy 1976;7:41–45.
 
25. Maton KI. Social support, organizational characteristics, psychological well-being, and group appraisal in three self-help group populations. Am J Community Psychol 1988;16:53–77.
 
26. Schiff M, Bargal D. Helping characteristics of self-help and support groups: Their contribution to participants’ subjective well-being. Small Group Research 2000;31:275–304.
 
27. Roberts LJ, Salem D, Rappaport J, et al. Giving and receiving help: interpersonal transactions in mutual-help meetings and psychosocial adjustment of members. Am J Community Psychol 1999;27:841–868.
 
28. Mäkelä K, Arminen I, Bloomfield K, et al. Alcoholics Anonymous as a Mutual-Help Movement: A Study in Eight Societies. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press; 1996.
 
29. Emrick CD, Tonigan JS, Montgomery H, et al. Alcoholics Anonymous: what is currently known? In: McCrady BS, Miller WR, eds. Research on Alcoholics Anonymous: Opportunities and Alternatives. New Brunswick, Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies, 1993, pp 41–78.
 
30. Tonigan JS, Toscova R, Miller WR. Meta-analysis of the literature on Alcoholics Anonymous: sample and study characteristics moderate findings. J Stud Alcohol 1996;57:65–72.
 
31. McIntire D. How well does A.A. work? Analysis of published A.A. surveys (1968–1996) and related analyses/comments. Alcohol Treat Q 2000;18:1–18.
 
32. Johnsen E, Herringer LG. A note on the utilization of common support activities and relapse following substance abuse treatment. J Psychol 1993;127:73–77.
 
33. Christo G, Franey C. Drug users’ spiritual beliefs, locus of control and the disease concept in relation to Narcotics Anonymous attendance and six-month outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend1995;38:51–56.
 
34. Toumbourou JW, Hamilton M, U’Ren A, et al. Narcotics Anonymous participation and changes in substance use and social support. J Subst Abuse Treat 2002;23:61–66.
 
35. Tonigan JS. Benefits of Alcoholics Anonymous attendance: replication of findings between clinical research sites in Project MATCH. Alcohol Treat Q 2001;19:67–78.
 
36. Yalom ID. Chapter 4: Curative factors overview. In: The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy New York, Basic Books, 1970.
 
37. Yalom ID. The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, 2nd ed. New York, Basic Books, 1975.
 
38. Alcoholics Anonymous World Services. Twelve steps and Twelve Traditions. New York, Alcoholics Anonymous Publishing, 1991.
 
39. World Service Office, Inc.: Narcotics Anonymous, 5th ed. Van Nuys, World Service Office, Inc., 1988.
 
40. Longabaugh R, Wirtz PW. Project MATCH Hypotheses: Results and causal chain analysis [NIH Publication No. 01-4238]. Vol 8, NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series. Rockville, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 2001.
 
41. Humphreys K, Kaskutas LA, Weisner C. The Alcoholics Anonymous Affiliation Scale: development, reliability, and norms for diverse treated and untreated populations. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1998;22:974–978.
 
42. Snyder M, Clary EG, Stukas AA. The functional approach to volunteerism. In: Maio GR, Olson JM, eds. Why We Evaluate: Functions of Attitudes. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, 2000, pp 365–393.
 
43. Rilling J, Gutman D, Zeh T, et al. A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron 2002;35:395–405.