Primary Article
Pulmonary Embolism and Malpractice Claims
Abstract
Abstract Background. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) with pulmonary embolization (PE) often occurs as an unexpected event with fatal consequences. This provides a setting for malpractice claims Methods. We reviewed 160 consecutive malpractice claims submitted by attorneys for medical expert review during the 11-year period ending in 1997. Seven cases involved DVT with PE Results. Alleged failure to anticipate and reduce the chance of PE was the basis for six of the claims. All six patients were at risk for lower extremity DVT, and one had a history of DVT 6 months earlier. The PE was manifested by sudden death in three cases. The seventh case represented a complication of heparin therapy for PE Conclusions. We conclude that risk management for PE should focus primarily on DVT. Physicians should perform and document an examination for DVT whenever there is a history of lower extremity stasis or it is likely to occur. They should also consider documenting a concurring second opinion when making anticoagulant-related decisionsThis content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.