Original Article

A Comparison of Medical Students' Learning Approaches between the First and Fourth Years

Authors: Eun-Kyung Chung, MD, PhD, Donna Elliott, MD, EdD, Dixie Fishe,r PhD, Win May, MD, PhD

Abstract

Objectives: We hypothesized that medical students exposed to a case-based curriculum in years 1 and 2 and clinical cases in the year 3 clerkship would demonstrate a longitudinal increase in the deep approach to learning and a decrease in the surface apathetic approach.

Methods: A cohort of first-year medical students completed the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students at the beginning of their first term and again at the beginning of their fourth year. Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students scores were aggregated into three main learning approach scales: deep, strategic, and surface apathetic.

Results: On average, deep and strategic scores did not significantly change between years 1 and 4, but the surface apathetic mean score decreased as a result of lower syllabus boundness and fear of failure subscale scores. Effect sizes were small ( d = 0.30, 0.34, respectively).

Conclusions: The deep approach to learning is a complex process and did not change in our students after 3 years of medical school, even though a case-based curriculum was believed to foster deeper learning. By the end of year 3, our students were, on average, less bound to syllabi and feared failure less.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. General Medical Council. Tomorrow’s doctors: recommendations on undergraduate medical education. London: General Medical Council. http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/tomorrows_doctors_2009.asp. Published 2009. Accessed February 8, 2015.
 
2. Anderson MB. A guide to the 130 reports in this snapshot supplement to Academic Medicine. Acad Med 2000;75(9 Suppl):SxYSxiv.
 
3. Irby DM, Wilkerson L. Educational innovations in academic medicine and environmental trends. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:370-376.
 
4. Jones R, Higgs R, de Angelis C, et al. Changing face of medical curricula. Lancet 2001;357:699-703.
 
5. Crang-Svalenius E, Stjernquist M. Applying the case method for teaching within the health professions--teaching the teachers. Med Teach 2005;27:489-492.
 
6. Newble DI, Entwistle NJ. Learning styles and approaches: implications for medical education. Med Educ 1986;20:162-175.
 
7. Coles CR. Differences between conventional and problem-based curricula in their students’ approaches to studying. Med Educ 1985;19:308-309.
 
8. McManus IC, Richards P, Winder BC, et al. Clinical experience, performance in final examinations, and learning style in medical students: prospective study. BMJ 1998;316:345-350.
 
9. Aaron S, Skakun E. Correlation of students’ characteristics with their learning styles as they begin medical school. Acad Med 1999;74:260-262.
 
10. Martin IG, Stark P, Jolly B. Benefiting from clinical experience: the influence of learning style and clinical experience on performance in an undergraduate objective structured clinical examination. Med Educ 2000;34:530-534.
 
11. Reid WA, Duvall E, Evans P. Relationship between assessment results and approaches to learning and studying in year two medical students. Med Educ 2007;41:754-762.
 
12. Mattick K, Dennis I, Bligh J. Approaches to learning and studying in medical students: validation of a revised inventory and its relation to student characteristics and performance. Med Educ 2004;38:535-543.
 
13. Mayya SS, Rao AK, Ramnarayan K. Learning approaches, learning difficulties and academic performance of undergraduate students of physiotherapy. http://ijahsp.nova.edu. Accessed February 8, 2015.
 
14. May W, Chung EK, Elliott D, et al. The relationship between medical students’ learning approaches and performance on a summative high-stakes clinical performance examination. Med Teach 2012;34:e236-e241.
 
15. Bockers A, Mayer C, Bockers TM. Does learning in clinical context in anatomical sciences improve examination results, learning motivation, or learning orientation? Anat Sci Educ 2014;7:3-11.
 
16. Chen TC, Hu MH. Influence of course design on learning approaches and academic performance in physical therapy students. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813032618. Accessed February 8, 2015.
 
17. Coffield F, Modeley F, Hall E, et al. Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post 16 Learning. A Systematic and Critical Review. London, Learning and Skills Research Center, 2004.
 
18. Tait H, Entwistle NJ, McCune V. ASSIST: a re-conceptualisation of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. In: Rust C (ed): Improving Students as Learners. Oxford, UK, Oxford Brookes University, Centre for Staff and Learning Development, 1998, pp 262-271.
 
19. Marton F, Saljo R. On qualitative differences in learning I: outcome and processes. Br J Educ Psychol 1976;46:4Y11.
 
20. Marton F, Saljo R. On qualitative differences in learning II: outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. Br J Educ Psychol 1976;46:115-127.
 
21. Gijbels D, van de Watering G, Dochy F, et al. The relationship between students’ approaches to learning and learning outcomes. Euro J Psychol Educ 2005;20:327-341.
 
22. Chigerwe M, Ilkiw JE, Boudreaux KA. Influence of a veterinary curriculum on the approaches and study skills of veterinary medical students. J Vet Med Educ 2011;38:384-394.
 
23. Gurpinar E1, Kulac E, Tetik C, et al. Do learning approaches of medical students affect their satisfaction with problem-based learning? Adv Physiol Educ 2013;37:85-88.
 
24. Kegels E, Vandekerckhove M, Remmen R, et al. Learning approaches in a traditional curriculum at senior student level may be responsive to practice-based learning in the primary care setting. Educ Prim Care 2008;19:624-631.
 
25. Samarakoon L, Fernando T, Rodrigo C. Learning styles and approaches to learning among medical undergraduates and postgraduates. BMC Med Educ 2013;13:42.
 
26. Taylor CR. Perspective: a tale of two curricula: a case for evidence-based education? Acad Med 2010;85:507-511.
 
27. Entwistle NJ. Approaches and study skills inventory for students. Enhancing Teaching and Learning Project. http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk//publications.html#measurement. Published 2006. Accessed February 9, 2015.
 
28. Welch L, Vitacco M. Critical Synthesis Package: Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). https://www.mededportal.org/publication/9404. Published 2013. Accessed February 9, 2015.
 
29. Nunn R. Mere anecdote: evidence and stories in medicine. J Eval Clin Pract 2011;17:920-926.
 
30. Zeegers P. Approaches to learning in science: a longitudinal study. Br J Educ Psychol 2001;71(Pt 1):115-132.
 
31. McManus IC, Richards P, Winder BC. Intercalated degrees, learning styles and career preferences: prospective longitudinal study of UK medical students. BMJ 1999;319:542-546.
 
32. Walker R, Spronken-Smith R, Bond C, et al. The impact of curriculum change on health sciences first year students’ approaches to learning. Instr Sci 2010;38:707-722.
 
33. Reid WA, Duvall E, Evans P. Can we influence medical students’ approaches to learning? Med Teach 2005;27:401-407.
 
34. Wickramasinghe DP, Samarasekera DN. Factors influencing the approaches to studying of preclinical and clinical students and postgraduate trainees. BMC Med Educ 2011;11:22.
 
35. Engels PT, de Gara C. Learning styles of medical students, general surgery residents, and general surgeons: implications for surgical education. BMC Med Educ 2010;10:51.
 
36. Baeten M, Kyndt E, Struyven K, et al. Using student-centered learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educ Res Rev 2010;5:243-260.
 
37. Trigwell K, Prosser M, Waterhouse F. Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Educ 2000;37:57-70.
 
38. Shaw DL, Wedding D. (2001). Special problems of medical students. In: Wedding D, ed. Behavior and Medicine. 3rd ed. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber; 2001: pp 67-84.
 
39. Edmunds R, Richardson JT. Conceptions of learning, approaches to studying and personal development in UK higher education. Br J Educ Psych 2009;79(Pt 2):295-309.