Original Article
Addressing the ACGME Competency of Communicating with the Public through the Use of TEDx Talks
Abstract
Objectives: Competency-based public communication skills are not systematically taught in most medical curricula, reflecting a gap between medical knowledge and holistic patient care as trainees transition into clinicians. We sought to investigate the efficacy of technology, entertainment, and design (TED) talks in postgraduate year (PGY) training programs.Methods: The authors organized an official internal TEDx event in which six PGY trainees volunteered as speakers. Two experienced physicians and two administrators also participated as speakers to provide trainees a didactic shadow learning experience. The remaining PGY trainees, along with clerks, physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and administrators, attended the conference. Before the event, speakers undertook individual training sessions and learned the principles of the presentation structure and storytelling mode. At the end of the event, a survey evaluating overall satisfaction in communication skills and professionalism was administered to all of the attendees.
Results: Survey participants totaled 104, with a response rate of 97.2%. TEDx talks improved trainees’ levels of patient care, communication, and professionalism. Speakers reported the high level of satisfaction with the event (mean 4.96 on a 5-point Likert scale; standard deviation 0.20). Participants agreed that the shadowing experience was useful and that the event encouraged them to pursue interests outside the medical field.
Conclusions: This study highlights that TED is successful in terms of participant satisfaction and training in communication and professionalism. Engaging and training PGY trainees through TED-style events could bridge the gap between acquired knowledge and professional competencies. The authors recommend the implementation of TED-style events in medical training programs.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($15)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Carraccio C, Wolfsthal SD, Englander R, et al. Shifting paradigms: from Flexner to competencies. Acad Med 2002;77:361–367.
2. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Common program requirements. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRResidency2021.pdf. Published July 1, 2021. Accessed March 2, 2022.
3. Frank JR. A history of CanMEDS – chapter from Royal College of Physicians of Canada 75th Anniversary History. https://www.efomp.org/uploads/b4cad47f00a5-4128-a460-f0851bd7beed/CanMEDShistoryforRoyalCollege75th anniversary2004byJRFrank.pdf. Published 2004. Accessed March 2, 2022.
4. Ten Cate O, Schelle F. Competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Acad Med 2007;82:542–547.
5. Rubenstein LD. Using TED talks to inspire thoughtful practice. Teach Educ 2012;47:261–267.
6. Brownwell AK, Côté L. Senior residents’ views on the meaning of professionalism and how they learn about it. Acad Med 2001;76:734–737.
7. Mink RB, Myers AL, Turner DA, et al. Competencies, milestones, and a level of supervision scale for entrustable professional activities for scholarship. Acad Med 2018;93:1668–1672.
8. Thompson-Lastad A, Gardiner P. Group medical visits and clinician wellbeing. Glob Adv Health Med 2020;9:2164956120973979.
9. Compagnone A. Knowledge dissemination and environmentalism: exploring the language of TED talks. In: Chiavetta E, Sciarrino S, Williams C, eds. Popularisation and the Media. Bari, Italy: Edipuglia: 2014: 7–25.
10. Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA 2002;287:226–235.
11. Tam KW, Tsai LW, Wu CC, et al. Using vote cards to encourage active participation and to improve critical appraisal skills in evidence-based medicine journal clubs. J Eval Clin Pract 2011;17:827–831.
12. Rice T, Arnovitz M, Hubert M, et al. Inpatient child and adolescent psychiatry as an extracurricular venue for medical student and resident education and professional development story time and teen talk. Acad Psychiatry 2020;44: 577–580.
13. Scheffer C, Tauschel D, Neumann M, et al. Active student participation may enhance patient centeredness: patients’ assessments of the clinical education ward for integrative medicine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013; 2013:743832.
14. Auerbach L, Santen SA, Cutrer WB, et al. The educators’ experience: learning environments that support the master adaptive learner. Med Teach 2020;42:1270–1274.
15. Hyer RN, Covello VT. Effective media communication during public health emergencies: a WHO field guide. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43477. Published 2005. Accessed March 15, 2022.
16. Liao HC, Wang YH. Storytelling in medical education: narrative medicine as a resource for interdisciplinary collaboration. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:1135.
17. Coulehan J, Williams PC. Vanquishing virtue: the impact of medical education. Acad Med 2001;76:598–605.
18. Glicken AD, Merenstein GB. Addressing the hidden curriculum: understanding educator professionalism. Med Teach 2007;29:54–57.
19. Wright S, Wong A, Newill C. The impact of role models on medical students. J Gen Intern Med 1997;12:53–56.
20. Passi V, Johnson S, Peile E, et al. Doctor role modelling in medical education: BEME guide no. 27. Med Teach 2013;35:e1422–e1436.
21. Passi V, Johnson N. The hidden process of positive doctor role modelling. Med Teach 2016;38:700–707.
22. Yoon JD, Ham SA, Reddy ST, et al. Role models’ influence on specialty choice for residency training: a national longitudinal study. J Grad Med Educ 2018;10:149–154.
