Editorial

Aggression and Visors in the National Hockey League

Authors: Sean T. Stevens, MA, Jamie Lynn Masco, BA, Julian Paul Keenan, PhD

Abstract

Ice hockey is inherently physical in nature, and physical contact is an expected and desirable part of the game.1,2 Because hockey is played on a closed surface at high speeds, there exists a significant risk of injury resulting from collisions with other players and objects. Of particular concern are injuries to the head or face, such as facial lacerations or eye injuries. In adult recreational leagues, helmets are almost always mandatory, but facial protection is often optional (as it is with the National Hockey League [NHL]). Considerable debate exists over whether visors should be mandated in order to reduce the occurrence of such serious injuries. Visors have been reported to reduce peripheral vision3and fog up during the course of a game,4 while not offering greater protection against eye, face, and head injuries.5 Players also “look down” upon the visor, seeing lack of a visor as a sign of increased masculinity and toughness while also reporting that wearing one may make them a target for the opposition.6

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first.

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view your purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($15)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Covassin T, Swanik CB, Sachs ML. Epidemiological considerations of concussions among intercollegiate athletes. Appl Neuropsychol 2003;10:12–22.
 
2. Pashby T. Eye injuries in Canadian amateur hockey still a concern. Can J Ophthalmol 1987;22:293–295.
 
3. Ing E, Ing T, Ing S. The effect of hockey visor and sports goggles on visual function. Can J Opthalmol 2002;37:161–167.
 
4. Pashby TJ. Eye injuries in Canadian amateur hockey. Am J Sports Med 1979;7:254–257.
 
5. Benson BW, Rose MS, Meeuwisse WH. The impact of face shield use on concussions in ice hockey: a multivariate analysis. Br J Sports Med 2002;36:27–32.
 
6. Stuart MJ, Smith AM, Malo-Ortiguera SA, et al. A comparison of facial protection and the incidence of head, neck, and facial injuries in junior A hockey players. A function of individual playing time. Am J Sports Med 2002;30:39–44.
 
7. Woods S, Diehl J, Zabat E, et al. Is it cost-effective to require recreational hockey players to wear face protection? South Med J 2008;101:991–995.
 
8. Stevens ST, Lassonde M, DeBeaumont L, et al. The effect of visors on head and facial injury in National Hockey League players. J Sci Med Sport 2006;9:238–242.
 
9. Benson BW, Mohtadi NG, Rose MS, et al. Head and neck injuries among ice hockey players wearing full face shields vs half face shields. JAMA 1999;282:2328–2332.
 
10. LaPrade RF, Burnett QM, Zarzour R, et al. The effect of the mandatory use of face masks on facial lacerations and head and neck injuries in ice hockey. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med 1995;23:773–775.
 
11. McCarthy JF, Kelly BR. Aggression, performance variables, and anger self-report in ice hockey players. J Psychol 1978;99:97–101.