Original Article

An Educational Needs Assessment of Telehealth in Primary Care Among US Internal Medicine Residents

Authors: Daniel Hindman, MD, MPH, Donna Windish, MD, MPH, Henry Michtalik, MD, MPH, Amanda Bertram, MS, Laura Prichett, PhD, MHS, Amit Pahwa, MD

Abstract

Objectives: As a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, many Internal Medicine (IM) residency programs converted to telehealth for primary care. Our objectives in this study were to better understand resident past and present telehealth education, their perceived barriers to telehealth practice, and their perceived solutions to improving telehealth use and education.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional needs assessment survey between November 2020 and February 2021 among residents at 10 IM residency programs across the United States. Our primary measures were telehealth use in resident continuity clinics before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, telehealth training, and confidence and barriers in using telehealth.

Results: Of 857 residents contacted, 314 (36.6%) responded. Residents reported low rates of education in telehealth prepandemic with significant improvements after the start of the pandemic across all visit domains (range of 10.7%–19.6% prepandemic compared with 25.6%–55.7% postpandemic, all P < 0.001). Resident confidence levels were significantly lower (P < 0.001) for video visits and telephone visits compared with in-person visiting across domains of communication, history taking, using an interpreter, making a diagnosis, counseling patients, providing psychosocial support, performing medical management, and coordinating after-visit care. Reported barriers included patient resources, clinic resources, lack of preceptor feedback, and lack of observation. Reported resources for improvement included tutorials on physical examination techniques, clinical space for telehealth, and patient resources for telehealth.

Conclusions: To effectively address the educational needs for telehealth practice by IM residents, educators must consider not only curricular needs but also clinical, preceptor, and patient barriers to the high-quality use of telehealth for primary care.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Tuckson RV, Edmunds M, Hodgkins ML. Telehealth. N Engl J Med 2017; 377:1585–1592.
 
2. Greenhalgh T, Koh GCH, Car J. Covid-19: a remote assessment in primary care. BMJ 2020;368:m1182.
 
3. Stanford Center for Continuing Medical Education. Tele-Presence 5: a ritual of connection for virtual visits. https://stanford.cloud-cme.com/course/courseoverview?P=3000&#x0026;EID=35769. Accessed August 20, 2021.
 
4. Zulman DM, Haverfield MC, Shaw JG, et al. Practices to foster physician presence and connection with patients in the clinical encounter. JAMA 2020; 323:70–81.
 
5. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Shaw S, et al, Video consultations for covid-19. BMJ 2020;368:m998. .
 
6. Wong R, Ng P, Spinnato T, et al. Expanding telehealth competencies in primary care: a longitudinal interdisciplinary simulation to train internal medicine residents in complex patient care. J Grad Med Educ 2020;12: 745–752.
 
7. Julien HM, Eberly LA, Adusumalli, S. Telemedicine and the forgotten America. Circulation 2020;142:312–314.
 
8. Jaffe DH, Lee L, Huynh S, et al. Health inequalities in the use of telehealth in the United States in the lens of COVID-19. Popul Health Manag 2020;23: 368–377.
 
9. Fleming DA, Riley SL, Boren S, et al. Incorporating telehealth into primary care resident outpatient training. Telemed J E Health 2009;15:277–282.
 
10. Lum E, van Galen LS, Car J. Competency-based training for entrustment in telehealth consultations. Pediatr Clin North Am 2020;67:735–757.
 
11. Hilty DM, Crawford A, Teshima J, et al. A framework for telepsychiatric training and e-health: competency-based education, evaluation and implications. Int Rev Psychiatry 2015;27:569–592.
 
12. Kirkland EB, DuBose-Morris R, Duckett A. Telehealth for the internal medicine resident: a 3-year longitudinal curriculum. J Telemed Telecare 2021;27:599–605.
 
13. Association of American Medical Colleges. Telehealth competencies across the learning continuum. https://store.aamc.org/downloadable/download/sample/sample_id/412. Published March 2021. Accessed March 13, 2023.
 
14. Hollander JE, Carr BG. Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1679–1681.
 
15. Esper GJ, Sweeney RL, Winchell E, et al. Rapid systemwide implementation of outpatient telehealth in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. J Healthc Manag 2020;65:443–452.
 
16. Thomas P, Kern D, Hughes M, et al. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2015.
 
17. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019;95:103208.
 
18. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377–381f Sci 2020;131:104924.
 
19. Hindman DJ, Kochis SR, Apfel A, et al. Improving medical students’ OSCE performance in telehealth: the effects of a telephone medicine curriculum. Acad Med 2020;95:1908–1912.
 
20. Drerup B, Espenschied J, Wiedemer J, et al, Reduced no-show rates and sustained patient satisfaction of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health 2021;27:1409–1415.
 
21. Franciosi EB, Tan AJ, Kassamali B, et al. The impact of telehealth implementation on underserved populations and no-show rates by medical specialty during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health 2021;27: 874–880.
 
22. Lau KHV, Kaku M, Bissonnette S, et al. Three-way telemedicine visits in resident clinic. Med Educ 2020;54:1061–1062.
 
23. Walker C, Echternacht H, Brophy PD. Model for medical student introductory telemedicine education. Telemed J E Health 2019;25:717–723.
 
24. Harendza S, Gartner J, Zelesniack E, et al. Evaluation of a telemedicine-based training for final-year medical students including simulated patient consultations, documentation, and case presentation. GMS J Med Educ 2020;37:Doc94.
 
25. Alkureishi MA, Choo Z, Lenti G, et al. Clinician perspectives on telemedicine: observational cross-sectional study. JMIR Hum Factors 2021;8:e29690.
 
26. Vollbrecht H, Arora V, Otero S, et al, Evaluating the need to address digital literacy among hospitalized patients: cross-sectional observational study. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e17519.
 
27. Fischer SH, Ray KN, Mehrotra A, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of telehealth utilization in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2022302.
 
28. Nguyen M, Waller M, Panda A, et al. A review of patient and provider satisfaction with telemedicine. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2020;20:72.
 
29. Yancy WS, Macpherson DS, Hanusa BH, et al. Patient satisfaction in resident and attending ambulatory care clinics. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:755–762.
 
30. Essien UR, He W, Ray A, et al, Disparities in quality of primary care by resident and staff physicians: is there a conflict between training and equity? J Gen Intern Med 2019;34:1184–1191.