Original Article

Association of the All-Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups Severity of Illness and Risk of Mortality Classification with Outcomes

Authors: Emadeldeen Elgwairi, MD, Shengping Yang, PhD, Kenneth Nugent, MD

Abstract

Objectives: Diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) is a patient classification system used to characterize the types of patients that the hospital manages and to compare the resources needed during hospitalization. The DRG classification is based on International Classification of Diseases diagnoses, procedures, demographics, discharge status, and complications or comorbidities and compares hospital resources and outcomes used to determine how much Medicare pays the hospital for each “product/medical condition.” The All-Patient Refined DRG (APR-DRG) incorporated severity of illness (SOI) and risk of mortality (ROM) into the DRG system to adjust for patient complexity to compare resource utilization, complication rates, and lengths of stay.

Methods: This study included 18,478 adult patients admitted to a tertiary care center in Lubbock, Texas during a 1-year period. We recorded the APR-DRG SOI and ROM and some clinical information on these patients, including age, sex, admission shock index, admission glucose and lactate levels, diagnoses based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision discharge coding, length of stay, and mortality. We compared the levels of SOI and ROM across this clinical information.

Results: As the levels of SOI and ROM increase (which indicates increased disease severity and risk of mortality), age, glucose levels, lactate levels, shock index, length of stay, and mortality increased significantly (P < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that each unit increase in ROM and SOI level was significantly associated with an 11.45 and a 10.37 times increase in the odds of in-hospital mortality, respectively. The C-statistics for the corresponding models are 0.947 and 0.929, respectively. When both ROM and SOI were included in the model, the magnitudes of increase in odds of in-hospital mortality were 5.61 and 1.17 times for ROM and SOI, respectively. The C-statistic is 0.949.

Conclusions: This study indicates that the APR-DRG SOI and ROM scores provide a classification system that is associated with mortality and correlates with other clinical variables, such as the shock index and lactate levels, which are available on admission.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first.

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view your purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($15)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Strand K, Flaatten H. Severity scoring in the ICU: a review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;52:467–478.
 
2. Bouch DC, Thompson JP. Severity scoring systems in the critically ill. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 2008;8:181–185.
 
3. Granholm A, Perner A, Krag M, et al. Simplified mortality score for the intensive care unit (SMS-ICU): protocol for the development and validation of a bedside clinical prediction rule. BMJ Open 2017;7:e015339.
 
4. Maccariello ER, Valente C, Nogueira L, et al. Desempenho de seis modelos de predição prognóstica em pacientes críticos que receberam suporte renal extracorpóreo. Rev Bras Terapia Intens 2008;20: DOI 10.1590/S0103- 507X2008000200001.
 
5. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system. Chest 1991;100:1619–1636.
 
6. Ho KM, Lee KY, Williams T, et al. Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score with organ failure scores to predict hospital mortality. Anaesthesia 2007;62:466–473.
 
7. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE II. Crit Care Med 1985; 13:818–829.
 
8. Gunning K, Rowan K. ABC of intensive care: outcome data and scoring systems. BMJ 1999;319:241–244.
 
9. Rapsang A, Shyam DC. Scoring systems in the intensive care unit: a compendium. Indian J Crit Care Med 2014;18:220–228.
 
10. Department of Health and Human Services. Revision to Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems–2007 FY Occupational Mix Adjustment to Wage Index; Implementation; Final Rule. Fed Regist 2006;71:47869–48351.
 
11. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. FY 2007 hospital IPPS proposed rule - drg refinements. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/fy-2007- hospital-ipps-proposed-rule-drg-refinements. Accessed August 9, 2021.
 
12. Hackworth J, Askegard-Giesmann J, Rouse T, et al. The trauma registry compared to All Patient Refined Diagnosis Groups (APR-DRG). Injury 2017;48:1063–1068.
 
13. Mcgrade P, Yang S, Nugent K. The association between admission glucose levels and outcomes in adults admitted to a tertiary care hospital. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect 2019;9:195–202.
 
14. Sotello D, Yang S, Nugent K. Glucose and lactate levels at admission as predictors of in-hospital mortality. Cureus 2019;11:e6027.
 
15. Sotello D, Yang S, Nugent K. Comparison of the shock index, modified shock index, and age shock index in adult admissions to a tertiary hospital. Southwest Resp Crit Care Chron 2019;728:18–23.
 
16. Fontaine P. Using severity adjustment classification for hospital internal and external benchmarking. https://library.ahima.org/doc?oid=59268#. Xy2ZQihKiUk2004. Accessed August 9, 2021.
 
17. 3 M. APR DRG Classification System and 3 MAPR DRG Software, Health Information Systems. https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/478415O/3mapr-drg-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed August 9, 2021.
 
18. Rodríguez Roldán JM, de la Fuente Sánchez MA, del Nogal Sáez F, et al. Valor pronóstico de dos sistemas de clasificación de pacientes: APACHE II y grupos relacionados con el diagnóstico [Prognostic value of 2 patient classification systems: APACHE II and diagnosis-related groups]. Med Clin (Barc) 1994;102:613–615.
 
19. Rapoport J, Teres D, Lemeshow S, et al. Explaining variability of cost using a severity-of-lllness measure for icu patients. Med Care 1990;28:338–348.
 
20. Baram D, Daroowalla F, Garcia R, et al. Use of the All Patient RefinedDiagnosis Related Group (APR-DRG) risk of mortality score as a severity adjustor in the medical ICU. Clin Med Circ Resp Pulm Med 2008;2:19–25.
 
21. McCormick PJ, Lin HM, Deiner SG, et al. Validation of the All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Group (APR-DRG) risk of mortality and severity of illness modifiers as a measure of perioperative risk. J Med Syst 2018;42:81.
 
22. Park C, Zakare-Fagbamila RT, Dickson W, et al. Institutional review of predictors of in-hospital and 30-day discharge mortality in neurosurgical patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020;198:106231.
 
23. Frazee RC, Matejicka AV, Abernathy SW, et al. Concurrent chart review provides more accurate documentation and increased calculated case mix index, severity of illness, and risk of mortality. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220: 652–656.
 
24. Prytherch DR, Sirl JS, Schmidt P, et al. The use of routine laboratory data to predict in-hospital death in medical admissions. Resuscitation 2005; 66:203–207.
 
25. Froom P, Shimoni Z. Prediction of hospital mortality rates by admission laboratory tests. Clin Chem 2006;52:325–328.
 
26. Langlais E, Nesseler N, Le Pabic E, et al. Does the clinical frailty score improve the accuracy of the SOFA score in predicting hospital mortality in elderly critically ill patients? A prospective observational study. J Crit Care 2018;46:67–72.
 
27. Faisal M, Scally AJ, Jackson N, et al. Development and validation of a novel computer-aided score to predict the risk of in-hospital mortality for acutely ill medical admissions in two acute hospitals using their first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2018;8:e022939.
 
28. Conway R, Byrne D, O'Riordan D, et al. Comparative influence of Acute Illness Severity and comorbidity on mortality. Eur J Intern Med 2020;72: 42–46.
 
29. Watkinson PJ, Pimentel MAF, Clifton DA, et al. Manual centile-based early warning scores derived from statistical distributions of observational vitalsign data. Resuscitation 2018;129:55–60.
 
30. Linnen DT, Escobar GJ, Hu X, et al. Statistical modeling and aggregate-weighted scoring systems in prediction of mortality and ICU transfer: a systematic review. J Hosp Med 2019;14:161–169.
 
31. Cecil E, Bottle A, Esmail A, et al. What is the relationship between mortality alerts and other indicators of quality of care? A national cross-sectional study. J Health Serv Res Policy 2020;25:13–21.