Primary Article

Bishop Score: A Poor Diagnostic Test To Predict Failed Induction Versus Vaginal Delivery

Authors: NANCY W. HENDRIX MD, SUNEET P. CHAUHAN MD, JOHN C. MORRISON MD, EVERETT F. MAGANN MD, JAMES N. MARTIN JR. MD, LAWRENCE D. DEVOE MD

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background.We evaluated the accuracy of the Bishop score in predicting the likelihood of successful labor induction (entry into active phase) in nulliparous and multiparous women. Methods.During an index year, all patients having induction of labor and a preinduction Bishop score were included in a standard protocol for cervical ripening and use of oxytocin. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for Bishop scores (0 to 11) to predict abdominal delivery for failed induction (final cervical dilation <4 cm) versus vaginal delivery. Results.Parturients who had vaginal delivery (n=253) and those in whom attempted induction failed (n=38) did not differ significantly with respect to maternal demographics, length of gestation, Bishop score and its distribution, and infant birth weight. The area under the ROC curve did not differ significantly from the area under the nondiagnostic line. Conclusion.The Bishop score appears to be a poor predictor of the outcome of labor induction.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References