Invited Commentary

Commentary on “What Attracts Medical Students to Primary Care? A Nominal Group Evaluation”

Authors: Jacob A. Mitchell, BS, José E. Rodríguez, MD


Weiland and colleagues1 should be commended for their work in the area of primary care choice that appears in this issue of the Southern Medical Journal. As our nation struggles with a primary care provider shortage, new and innovative strategies are required. This article describes the results of interviews with highly motivated medical students who were interested in primary care and who were financially incentivized with scholarships to pursue primary care specialties

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($15)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.


1. Weiland G, Cox K, Sweeney MK, et al. What attracts medical students to primary care? A nominal group evaluation. South Med J 2019;112:76-82.
2. Fresne J, Youngclaus J, Shick M, et al. Medical student education: debt, costs, and loan repayment fact card. Published 2017. Accessed October 1, 2018.
3. Hsu AL, Caverzagie K. Educational debt and specialty choice. Virtual Mentor 2013;15:615-619.
4. Leigh JP, Tancredi D, Jerant A, et al. Physician wages across specialties: informing the physician reimbursement debate. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1728-1734.
5. Mader EM, Roseamelia C, Morley CP. The temporal decline of idealism in two cohorts of medical students at one institution. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:58.
6. Xierali IM, Nivet MA, Gaglioti AH, et al. Increasing family medicine faculty diversity still lags population trends. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:100-103.