Abstract

Abstract:The present survey compares the treatment preferences of New York and Texas psychiatrists using a questionnaire report of a single psychiatric case. The characteristics of this approach enable the investigator to hold the symptoms and syndromes of the patient constant. All clinicians respond to identical stimuli. What varies naturally, then, is the judgment of the clinician in developing his treatment procedure, thereby enabling estimation of the degree of standardization in treatment preferences. Three hundred twelve psychiatrists from New York and 133 from Texas provided data for comparative purposes. On the first admission 41% of the New York respondents and 24% of the Texas psychiatrists preferred a regimen that included more than one drug. When a combination of drugs was selected, chlorpromazine-trifluoperazine was preferred. But ten other specific combinations also were selected. Most were of potent neuroleptics, but some included antidepressant-neuroleptic combinations. None of the variables included in the study provided tangible systematic variance for these treatment preferences. A year and a half after first admission, followed by treatment in and out of hospital, the patient's clinical course continued to deteriorate. At this point more than 50% of the respondents in each state selected a regimen that included a minimum of two drugs. As many as 24 different combinations were selected for this single case. Nineteen percent of the New York respondents and 13% of the Texas respondents selected a regimen that included three or more psychoactive medications. The existence of these treatment preferences requires a more basic understanding of treatment preferences, for there seems to be no basis for them.