Original Article

Comparison of Color Doppler US and CT Portography in Evaluating Portal Hypertension in Children

Authors: Ibrahim Adaletli, Safa Barş, Gökçe Gülşen, Sebuh Kurugoglu, Fatih Kantarci, Ismail Mihmanl, Osman Faruk Şenyüz

Abstract

Objectives: To compare grayscale and color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) findings to that of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) portography in the evaluation of portal hypertension in children.


Methods: Thirty children (mean age, 11.4 years) with definitive clinical and laboratory diagnoses of portal hypertension were included in the study. Liver parenchymal changes, portal vein thrombosis, cavernous transformation, splenomegaly, recanalization of the paraumbilical vein, ascites collateral vessels, and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated prospectively.


Results: Liver parenchymal heterogeneity (n = 21) was detected more often by CDUS than MDCT (P = 0.002). CDUS and MDCT established similar results for increased right/left lobe ratio, lobulation of the liver contour, ascites, and splenomegaly. Portal vein thrombosis, cavernous transformation, and recanalization of the paraumbilical vein were comparable between CDUS and MDCT (κ = 1, P < 0.01). Collaterals were detected more by MDCT portography than by CDUS. Esophageal collaterals and azygous vein dilatation were seen only by MDCT portography (P < 0.01, P = 0.024; respectively).


Conclusions: CDUS was superior to MDCT in identifying parenchymal changes and hemodynamic parameters. MDCT was superior in detecting abnormal collateral circulation. The combination of these two modalities provides more comprehensive information than either alone in the diagnosis and follow-up of portal hypertension.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Westaby D, Williams R. Portal hypertension, in Berk JE (ed). Gastroenterology. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1985, ed 2, pp 3062–3082.
 
2. Gulati MS, Paul SB, Arora NK, et al. Esophageal and gastric vasculature in children with extrahepatic portal hypertension. Evaluation by intravenous CT portography. Clin Imaging 2000; 24: 351–356.
 
3. Pariente D, Franchi-Abella S. Paediatric chronic liver diseases: how to investigate and follow up? Role of imaging in the diagnosis of fibrosis. Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40: 906–919.
 
4. Kang HK, Jeong YY, Choi JH, et al. Three-dimentional Multi-detector row CT portal venography in the evaluation of portosystemic collateral vessels in liver cirrhosis. Radiographics 2002; 22: 1053–1061.
 
5. Sato T, Yamazaki K, Toyota J, et al. Color Doppler findings of gastric varices compared with findings on computed tomography. J Gastroenterol 2002; 37: 604–610.
 
6. Subramanyam BR, Balthazar EJ, Madamba MR, et al. Sonography of portosystemic venous collaterals in portal hypertension. Radiology 1983; 146: 161–166.
 
7. Kamel IR, Lawler LP, Corl FM, et al. Patterns of collateral pathways in extrahepatic portal hypertension as demonstrated by multidetector row computed tomography and advanced image processing. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 469–477.
 
8. Jüttner HU, Jenney JM, Ralls PW, et al. Ultrasound demonstration of portoystemic collaterals in cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Radiology 1982; 142: 459–463.
 
9. Vilgrain V. Ultrasound of diffuse liver disease and portal hypertension. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 1563–1577.
 
10. Ishihara K, Ishida R, Saito T, et al. Computed tomography features of portal hypertensive gastropathy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 832–835.
 
11. Tessler FN, Gehring BJ, Gomes AS, et al. Diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis: value of color Doppler imaging. AJR 1991; 157: 293–296.
 
12. Parvey HR, Eisenberg RL, Giyanani V, et al. Duplex sonography of the portal venous system: pitfalls and limitations. AJR 1989; 152: 765–770.
 
13. Bhasin DK, Malhi NJ. Variceal bleeding and portal hypertension: much to learn, much to explore. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 119–128.
 
14. Mostbeck GH, Wittich GR, Herold C, et al. Hemodynamic significance of the paraumbilical vein in portal hypertension: assessment with duplex US. Radiology 1989; 170: 339–342.
 
15. Berzigotti A, Dapporto S, Angeloni L, et al. Postprandial splanchnic haemodynamic changes in patients with liver cirrhosis and patent paraumblical vein. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 16: 1339–1345.
 
16. Agarwal A, Jain M. Multidetector CT portal venography in evaluation of portosystemic collateral vessels. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2008; 5: 4–9.
 
17. Cakmak O, Elmas N, Tamsel S, et al. Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography. Abdom Imaging 2008; 33: 65–71.
 
18. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004; 230: 619–628.
 
19. Ling SC, Walters T, McKiernan PJ, et al. Primary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage in children with portal hypertension: a framework for future research. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011; 52: 254–261.