Primary Article

Comparison of Individuals Receiving Anonymous and Confidential Testing for HIV

Authors: PAMELA A. MEYER MSPH, CAROL Z. GARRISON PhD, JEFFREY L. JONES MD, MPH, HAROLD DOWDA PhD

Abstract

ABSTRACT: We assessed the magnitude, demographics, seroprevalence, and reasons for site selection among South Carolina residents who chose to be tested in bordering states offering anonymous testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Residents tested from July 1990 through July 1991 at selected HIV testing sites in bordering states were surveyed and HIV test results were recorded. Of the 75 residents tested at these sites, 66 (88%) were white, 44 (59%) were male, and 9 (12.3%) of the 73 whose test results were recorded were HIV infected. During the same period, 57,137 individuals were HIV tested in-state by the state health department, of which 1,752 (3.1%) were positive. Residents tested outside the state were more likely to be HIV infected, male, and white than individuals tested within the state. Our findings suggest that although large numbers of South Carolinians are not HIV tested anonymously in other states, those tested anonymously out of state have a different demographic and risk profile than those tested confidentially in state.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References