Original Article

Descriptive Epidemiology of Cystic Hygroma: Hawaii, 1986 to 1999

Authors: Mathias B. Forrester, BS, Ruth D. Merz, MS

Abstract

Objectives: Cystic hygroma is associated with chromosomal abnormalities and a low chance of survival. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between cystic hygroma and various clinical and demographic factors.


Methods: Cystic hygroma cases delivered in Hawaii from 1986 to 1999 were obtained from a population-based birth defects registry. The rate per 10,000 births was determined for various demographic and clinical factors.


Results: The total cystic hygroma rate was 5.13 per 10,000 births. Chromosomal abnormalities were identified for 39% of the cases. There were no secular trends in cystic hygroma rates. Rates increased with increasing maternal age (P = 0.031). Rates were highest among Far East Asians, followed by Filipinos and whites, and lowest for Pacific Islanders. Cystic hygroma rates were higher in metropolitan Honolulu than in the rest of Hawaii. Rates were higher for females than for males. Cystic hygroma rates did not vary significantly by plurality.


Conclusions: Cystic hygroma rates were not found to be associated with delivery year or plurality, but were associated with maternal age, race and ethnicity, residence at delivery, and sex.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Gallagher PG, Mahoney MJ, Gosche JR. Cystic hygroma in the fetus and newborn. Semin Perinatol1999;23:341–356.
 
2. Edwards MJ, Graham JM. Posterior nuchal cystic hygroma. Clin Perinatol 1990;17:611–640.
 
3. Fisher R, Partington A, Dykes E. Cystic hygroma: comparison between prenatal and postnatal diagnosis. J Pediatr Surg 1996;31:473–476.
 
4. Papp Z, Toth-Pal E, Papp C, et al. Impact of prenatal mid-trimester screening on the prevalence of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective epidemiological study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;6:320–326.
 
5. Shulman LP, Emerson DS, Felker RE, et al. High frequency of cytogenetic abnormalities in fetuses with cystic hygroma diagnosed in the first trimester. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:80–82.
 
6. Anderson NG, Kennedy JC. Prognosis in fetal cystic hygroma. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol1992;32:36–39.
 
7. Cullen MT, Gabrielli S, Green JJ, et al. Diagnosis and significance of cystic hygroma in the first trimester. Prenat Diagn 1990;10:643–651.
 
8. Bernstein HS, Filly RA, Goldberg JD, et al. Prognosis of fetuses with a cystic hygroma. Prenat Diagn1991;11:349–355.
 
9. Julian-Reynier C, Philip N, Scheiner C, et al. Impact of prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound on the prevalence of congenital anomalies at birth in southern France. J Epidemiol Community Health1994;48:290–296.
 
10. Geifman-Holtzman O, Drury HE, Holmes LB. Increased detection of cystic hygroma: a “technology-induced phenomenon.”Teratology 1996; 54:298–302.
 
11. Tanriverdi HA, Hendrik HJ, Ertan AK, et al. Hygroma colli cysticum: prenatal diagnosis and prognosis. Am J Perinatol 2001;18:415–420.
 
12. Brumfield CG, Wenstrom KD, Davis RO, et al. Second-trimester cystic hygroma: prognosis of septated and nonseptated lesions. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:979–982.
 
13. Droste S, Hendricks SK, Von Alfrey H, et al. Cystic hygroma colli: perinatal outcome after prenatal diagnosis. J Perinat Med 1991;19:449–454.
 
14. Abramowicz JS, Warsof SL, Doyle DL, et al. Congenital cystic hygroma of the neck diagnosed prenatally: outcome with normal and abnormal karyotype. Prenat Diagn 1989;9:321–327.
 
15. Pijpers L, Reuss A, Stewart PA, et al. Fetal cystic hygroma: prenatal diagnosis and management.Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:223–224.
 
16. Chervenak FA, Isaacson G, Blakemore KJ, et al. Fetal cystic hygroma: cause and natural history. N Engl J Med 1983;309:822–825.
 
17. Fujita Y, Satoh S, Nakayama H, et al. In utero evaluation and the long-term prognosis of living infants with cystic hygroma. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001;16:402–406.
 
18. Ogita K, Suita S, Taguchi T, et al. Outcome of fetal cystic hygroma and experience of intrauterine treatment. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001;16:105–110.
 
19. National Birth Defects Prevention Network. State birth defects surveillance programs directory.Teratology 2001;64:S47–S116.
 
20. Ranke MB, Saenger P. Turner’s syndrome. Lancet 2001;358:309–314.
 
21. Gravholt CH, Juul S, Naeraa RW, et al. Prenatal and postnatal prevalence of Turner’s syndrome: a registry study. BMJ 1996;312:16–21.
 
22. Lorda-Sanchez I, Binkert F, Maechler M, et al. Molecular study of 45,X conceptuses: correlation with clinical findings. Am J Med Genet 1992;42:487–490.