Abstract

Most clinicians attempt to identify and treat recurrent breast cancer at the earliest sign of relapse. In an effort to better define the usefulness of commonly used clinical and laboratory tools in evaluating patients after mastectomy, we retrospectively analyzed 120 cases and reviewed the literature. One hundred fifteen sites of metastatic disease were identified in 55 patients, with bone, lung, liver, and skin most common. History and physical examination disclosed 66% of these metastatic events. Of 36 patients with probable bone involvement, 15 were identified by bone scan while asymptomatic. Of 31 patients with evidence of pulmonary metastases, 12 were entirely asymptomatic when identified with a screening chest roentgenogram. In contrast, 36 of 45 hepatic, cutaneous, lymphatic, central nervous system, and ocular metastases were suggested by purely clinical findings. We conclude that basic clinical skills (ie, history-taking and physical examination) are two most important means by which we identify patients with recurrent breast cancer. While chest roentgenogram and bone scan may uncover metastases in asymptomatic patients, liver function tests and radionuclide scans of brain and liver have very low yield in patients clinically free of organ involvement.