Original Article

Effectiveness of an Urban Emergency Department Call-Back System in the Successful Linkage to Treatment of Sexually Transmitted Infections

Authors: Sara A. Lolar, MS, PA-C, Robert L. Sherwin, MD, Duane M. Robinson, BA, Cheryl Courage, MA, Robert D. Welch, MS, MD

Abstract

Objectives: There is a high incidence of asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in emergency department (ED) patients. There is no historical indication, physical examination finding, or rapidly available laboratory testing specific for detecting STIs in women. This study was conducted to describe the performance of an ED call-back system for STI screening and linkage to care for treatment. Success was defined as the ability to contact STI-positive women who were undertreated and confirm their return for definitive treatment.

Methods: This retrospective, observational study of women 16 years and older evaluated those undertreated for STIs in the ED during the 13-month study period. A structured chart review was performed to determine the proportion of patients returning to an affiliated hospital ED or clinic for treatment after contact by telephone or letter.

Results: Of 361 patients identified as undertreated, 29.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.7–34.1) did not return for definitive treatment. The method of contact was associated with patient return for treatment. Of the 276 patients contacted by telephone, 19.6% did not return for treatment (95% CI 14.9–24.3); of the 83 patients contacted by letter, 60.2% did not return for treatment (95% CI 49.7–70.8; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: A large proportion of patients undertreated for an STI did not return despite a notification of need for further treatment. This study had a high rate of successful telephone contact (76.5%), but contact did not substantially increase the overall proportion of patients who were linked to care and returned to the ED for treatment.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Chan L, Snyder HS, Verdile VP. A retrospective review of positive chlamydial cultures in emergency department patients. Am J Emerg Med 1996;14:406-410.
 
2. Yealy DM, Greene TJ, Hobbs GD. Underrecognition of cervical Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 1997;4:962-967.
 
3. Mehta SD, Rothman RE, Kelen GD, et al. Unsuspected gonorrhea and chlamydia in patients of an urban adult emergency department: a critical population for STD control intervention. Sex Transm Dis 2001;28:33-39.
 
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011 sexually transmitted disease surveillance. http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats11. Accessed March 29, 2015.
 
5. Curtis KM, Hillis SD, Kieke BA Jr, et al. Visits to emergency departments for gynecologic disorders in the United States, 1992Y1994. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:1007-1012.
 
6. Scott DR, Batal HA, Majeres S, et al. Access and care issues in urban urgent care clinic patients. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:222.
 
7. Silva A, Glick NR, Lyss SB, et al. Implementing an HIV and sexually transmitted disease screening program in an emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2007;49:564-572.
 
8. Mehta SD, Hall J, Lyss SB, et al. Adult and pediatric emergency department sexually transmitted disease and HIV screening: programmatic overview and outcomes. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:250-258.
 
9. Berg E, Benson DM, Haraszkiewicz P, et al. High prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in women with urinary infections. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:1030-1034.
 
10. Faricy L, Page T, Ronick M, et al. Patterns of empiric treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in an underserved population. Fam Med 2012;44:408-415.
 
11. Pattishall AE, Rahman SY, Jain S, et al. Empiric treatment of sexually transmitted infections in a pediatric emergency department: are we making the right decisions? Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:1588-1590.
 
12. Ahmad FA, Jeffe DB, Plax K, et al. Computerized self-interviews improve chlamydia and gonorrhea testing among youth in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2014;64:376-384.
 
13. Workowski KA, Berman S, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR RecommRep 2010;59(RR-12):1-110.
 
14. Andric B, Drowos J, Trepka MJ, et al. High frequencies of negative pretreatment results following presumptive antibiotic treatment for chlamydia and gonorrhea. South Med J 2013;106:321-326.
 
15. Mehta SD, Rothman RE, Kelen GD, et al. Clinical aspects of diagnosis of gonorrhea and Chlamydia infection in an acute care setting. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:655-659.
 
16. Gift TL, Hogben M. Emergency department sexually transmitted disease and human immunodeficiency virus screening: findings from a national survey. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:993-996.
 
17. Krivochenitser R, Jones JS, Whalen D, et al. Underrecognition of cervical Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant patients in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2013;31:661-663.
 
18. Boudreaux ED, Ary RD, St John B, et al. Telephone contact of patients visiting a large, municipal emergency department: can we rely on numbers given during routine registration? J Emerg Med 2000;18:409-415.
 
19. Isaacman DJ, Khine H, Losek JD. A simple intervention for improving telephone contact of patients discharged from the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 1997;13:256-258.
 
20. Levitt MA, Johnson S, Engelstad L, et al. Clinical management of chlamydia and gonorrhea infection in a county teaching emergency department--concerns in overtreatment, undertreatment, and follow-up treatment success. J Emerg Med 2003;25:7-11.
 
21. Jenkins WD, Zahnd W, Kovach R, et al. Chlamydia and gonorrhea screening in United States emergency departments. J Emerg Med 2013;44:558-567.
 
22. Kelly JJ, Dalsey WC, McComb J, et al. Follow-up program for emergency department patients with gonorrhea or chlamydia. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1437-1439.
 
23. Al-Tayyib AA, Miller WC, Rogers SM, et al. Health care access and follow-up of chlamydial and gonococcal infections identified in an emergency department. Sex Transm Dis 2008;35:583-587.
 
24. Irvin CB, Nowak B, Moore M, et al. Emergency department Chlamydia screening through partnership with the public health department. Acad Emerg Med 2009;16:1217-1220.
 
25. Kuhn GJ, Campbell A, Merline J, et al. Diagnosis and follow-up of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 1998;16:157-159.
 
26. Huppert JS, Reed JL, Munafo JK, et al. Improving notification of sexually transmitted infections: a quality improvement project and planned experiment. Pediatrics 2012;130:e415-e422.
 
27. Menchine M, Oberfoell S, Schriger D, et al. Improving telephone followup for patients discharged from the emergency department: results of a randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med 2013;20:456-462.
 
28. Kwon NS, Colucci A, Gulati R, et al. A survey of the prevalence of cell phones capable of receiving health information among patients presenting to an Urban Emergency Department. J Emerg Med 2013;44:875-888.
 
29. Buhi ER, Klinkenberger N, Hughes S, et al. Teens’ use of digital technologies and preferences for receiving STD prevention and sexual health promotion messages: implications for the next generation of intervention initiatives. Sex Transm Dis 2013;40:52-54.
 
30. Rask KJ, Williams MV, Parker RM, et al. Obstacles predicting lack of a regular provider and delays in seeking care for patients at an urban public hospital. JAMA 1994;271:1931-1933.
 
31. Ahmed SM, Lemkau JP, Nealeigh N, et al. Barriers to healthcare access in a non-elderly urban poor American population. Health Soc Care Community 2001;9:445-453.
 
32. Syed ST, Gerber BS, Sharp LK. Traveling towards disease: transportation barriers to health care access. J Community Health 2013;38:976-993.
 
33. Mehta SD, Shahan J, Zenilman JM. Ambulatory STD management in an inner-city emergency department: descriptive epidemiology, care utilization patterns, and patient perceptions of local public STD clinics. Sex Transm Dis 2000;27:154-158.
 
34. Jones J, Clark W, Bradford J, et al. Efficacy of a telephone follow-up system in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 1988;6:249-254.
 
35. Dhar J, Leggat C, Bonas S. TextingVa revolution in sexual health communication. Int J STD AIDS 2006;17:375-377.
 
36. Bachmann LH, Pigott D, Desmond R, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with gonorrhea and chlamydial infection in at-risk females presenting to an urban emergency department. Sex Transm Dis 2003;30:335-339.
 
37. Menon-Johansson AS, McNaught F, Mandalia S, et al. Texting decreases the time to treatment for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sex Transm Infect 2006;82:49-51.