Original Article

Endoscopic Surveillance for Gastric Ulcers

Authors: Mohammad Esmadi, MD, Dina S. Ahmad, MD, Hazem T. Hammad, MD

Abstract

Objective: Gastric ulcers (GUs) can be caused by a malignancy, and endoscopists are challenged with the question of how to rule out underlying malignancy. Although routine endoscopic surveillance is not advised, it is still overused. The purpose of this study was to explore the practice in our tertiary referral center during the last 3 years.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all inpatient and outpatient esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs) that were performed between November 2009 and November 2012 for GUs. Patients with GUs who normally would not undergo biopsy, such as patients who present with bleeding or had stigmata of high-risk bleeding, were excluded.

Results: A total of 165 patients were diagnosed between November 2009 and November 2012 as having GUs on EGD. Fifty-two patients were excluded because they presented with bleeding or had GUs that had stigmata of high-risk bleeding. We reviewed the charts of 113 patients and endoscopic surveillance was recommended for 96 (85%). Of those 96 patients, 72 (64%) underwent repeat EGD. In those 72 patients, GU was still present in 9 patients and was completely healed or healing in 63 patients. Only 25 (22%) GUs were biopsied at initial EGD, 23 of which were benign and 2 were adenocarcinomas. No additional malignancy was found on surveillance EGD.

Conclusions: EGD surveillance for GUs is a common practice, although the guidelines discourage such a practice. Our rate of endoscopic surveillance was significantly higher than reported previously (64% vs 25%). In our experience, such a high rate of surveillance did not reveal any additional gastric malignancy. Alternatively, the rate of biopsy of GUs at initial EGD is low (22%), which also reflects endoscopists’ preference for endoscopic surveillance.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Sung JJ, Kuipers EJ, El-Serag HB. Systematic review: the global incidence and prevalence of peptic ulcer disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009;29:938-946.
 
2. Akdamar K, Ertan A, Agrawal NM, et al. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in normal asymptomatic volunteers. Gastrointest Endosc 1986;32:78-80.
 
3. Aro P, Storskrubb T, Ronkainen J, et al. Peptic ulcer disease in a general adult population: the Kalixanda study: a random population-based study. Am J Epidemiol 2006;163:1025-1034.
 
4. Bernersen B, Johnsen R, Straume B, et al. Towards a true prevalence of peptic ulcer: the Sorreisa gastrointestinal disorder study. Gut 1990;31:989-992.
 
5. Maniatis AG, Eisen GM, Brazer SR. Endoscopic discrimination of gastric ulcers. J Clin Gastroenterol 1997;24:203-206.
 
6. Bustamante M, Devesa F, Borghol A, et al. Accuracy of the initial endoscopic diagnosis in the discrimination of gastric ulcers: is endoscopic follow-up study always needed? J Clin Gastroenterol 2002;35:25-28.
 
7. Arroyo MT, Forne M, de Argila CM, et al. The prevalence of peptic ulcer not related to Helicobacter pylori or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use is negligible in southern Europe. Helicobacter 2004;9:249-254.
 
8. Nishikawa K, Sugiyama T, Kato M, et al. Non-Helicobacter pylori, and non-NSAID peptic ulcer disease in the Japanese population. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000;12:635-640.
 
9. Chan TO, Kuo YC, Chien RN, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma simulating benign gastric ulcer. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi 1992;15:59-63.
 
10. Podolsky I, Storms PR, Richardson CT, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma masquerading endoscopically as benign gastric ulcer. A five-year experience. Dig Dis Sci 1988;33:1057-1063.
 
11. Pruitt RE, Truss CD. Endoscopy, gastric ulcer, and gastric cancer. Follow-up endoscopy for all gastric ulcers? Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:284-288.
 
12. Graham DY, Schwartz JT, Cain GD, et al. Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology 1982;82:228-231.
 
13. Eckardt VF, Giessler W, Kanzler G, et al. Does endoscopic follow-up improve the outcome of patients with benign gastric ulcers and gastric cancer? Cancer 1992;69:301-305.
 
14. Bytzer P. Endoscopic follow-up study of gastric ulcer to detect malignancy: is it worthwhile? Scand J Gastroenterol 1991;26:1193-1199.
 
15. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. SEER cancer statistics review 1975-2006. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006. Accessed February 15, 2013.
 
16. Cohen J, Safdi MA, Deal SE, et al. Quality indicators for esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:886-891.
 
17. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Banerjee S, Cash BD, et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of patients with peptic ulcer disease. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:663-668.
 
18. Saini SD, Eisen G, Mattek N, et al. Utilization of upper endoscopy for surveillance of gastric ulcers in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:1920-1925.
 
19. Hosokawa O, Watanabe K, Hatorri M, et al. Detection of gastric cancer by repeat endoscopy within a short time after negative examination. Endoscopy 2001;33:301-305.
 
20. Whiting JL, Sigurdsson A, Rowlands DC, et al. The long term results of endoscopic surveillance of premalignant gastric lesions. Gut 2002;50:378-381.
 
21. Kitahara F, Kobayashi K, Sato T, et al. Accuracy of screening for gastric cancer using serum pepsinogen concentrations. Gut 1999;44:693-697.
 
22. Breslin NP, Sutherland LR. Survey of current practices among members of CAG in the follow-up of patients diagnosed with gastric ulcer. Can J Gastroenterol 1999;13:489-493.
 
23. Savarino E, Corbo M, Dulbecco P, et al. Narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy is accurate for detecting gastric intestinal metaplasia. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:2668-2675.
 
24. Kim KO, Ku YS. Is image-enhanced endoscopy useful for the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal tumor? Clin Endosc 2013;46:248-250.