Original Article

Innovations in Faculty Development: Study of a Research Assistance Unit Designed to Assist Clinician-Educators with Research

Authors: Melissa Eder, MLS, CCRP, J. Rush Pierce Jr, MD, MPH

Abstract

Objectives: At a mid-sized community medical school, research was not traditionally strong. Faculty members cited lack of infrastructure support as a significant research barrier. In response, the regional dean developed and funded a research assistance unit (RAU) in 2006 to provide administrative and statistical support to junior faculty beginning their research programs. This study examined the efficacy of the RAU from 2006-2008.


Methods: The authors reviewed RAU records for number and types of projects; time from initial contact to IRB approval; type and hours of assistance; number of abstracts and publications resulting from RAU-sponsored projects; number and rank of faculty, student, and resident researchers; and cost of RAU operations. A satisfaction survey was given to faculty members who completed projects.


Results: The RAU provided assistance with 68 projects involving a total of 36 faculty members, 34 residents, and 21 medical students, resulting in 12 published abstracts and/or manuscripts. RAU administrative assistance averaged 7 hours per project. Statistical assistance was provided for 21 projects and averaged 13 hours. Participation in clinical research by faculty rose from 8% to 32%, by residents from 24% to 31%, and by medical students from 22% to 43%. Of surveyed faculty, 92% rated their experience with the RAU as satisfactory or very satisfactory. Cost averaged $128,000 yearly.


Conclusions: The creation of a staff support unit resulted in an increase in research by faculty, residents, and students.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Beasley BW, Wright SM. Looking forward to promotion: characteristics of participants in the prospective study of promotion in academia. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:705-710.
 
2. Campbell EG, Weissman JS, Moy E, et al. Status of clinical research in academic health centers: views from the research leadership. JAMA 2001;286:800-806.
 
3. Crowley WF Jr, Thier SO. A program to facilitate clinical research in an AHC: the first five years. Acad Med 2001;76:403-409.
 
4. Arbit HM, Paller MS. A program to provide regulatory support for investigator-initiated clinical research. Acad Med 2006;81:146-153.
 
5. Baldwin CD, Goldblum RM, Rassin DK, et al. Facilitating faculty development and research through critical review of grant proposals and articles. Acad Med 1994;69:62-64.
 
6. Derish PA, Maa J, Ascher NL, et al. Enhancing the mission of academic surgery by promoting scientific writing skills. J Surg Res 2007;140:177-183.
 
7. Klein KP, Foley KL, Legault C, et al. Creation of a grant support service within a women's health center of excellence: experiences and lessons learned. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2006;15:127-134.
 
8. Hekelman FP, Gilchrist V, Zyzanski SJ, et al. An educational intervention to increase faculty publication productivity. Fam Med 1995;27:255-259.
 
9. Shah J, Shah A, Pietrobon R. Scientific writing of novice researchers: what difficulties and encouragements do they encounter? Acad Med 2009;84:511-516.
 
10. Hayes TW, Jones BJ, Tenner TE Jr. Revising guidelines for tenure and promotion: achieving faculty ownership. Poster presented at Association of American Medical Colleges Group on Faculty Affairs Professional Development Conference; San Francisco; August 7-9, 2009.
 
11. Teo AR. The development of clinical research training: past history and current trends in the united states. Acad Med 2009;84:433-438.
 
12. Conn VS, Porter RT, McDaniel RW, et al. Building research productivity in an academic setting. Nurs Outlook 2005;53:224-231.
 
13. Gonzales AO, Westfall J, Barley GE. Promoting medical student involvement in primary care research. Fam Med 1998;30:113-116.
 
14. Shapiro J, Coggan P, Rubel A, et al. The process of faculty-mentored student research in family medicine: motives and lessons. Fam Med 1994;26:283-289.
 
15. Solomon SS, Tom SC, Pichert J, et al. Impact of medical student research in the development of physician-scientists. J Investig Med 2003;51:149-156.
 
16. Straus SE, Straus C, Tzanetos K, International Campaign to Revitalise Academic Medicine. Career choice in academic medicine: systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:1222-1229.
 
17. Zier K, Friedman E, Smith L. Supportive programs increase medical students' research interest and productivity. J Investig Med 2006;54:201-207.