Abstract

AbstractIsolated limb perfusion (ILP) for melanoma of the extremity was first used clinically more than 30 years ago. Although ILP with chemotherapeutic agents has become routine practice in many oncologic centers, few studies have evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of particular agents. Two consecutive groups of 100 patients with stage I extremity melanoma of 1.5 mm thickness or greater were treated by ILP with either melphalan (L-PAM) or dacarbazine (DTIC). Demographics, clinical and pathologic stage, disease site, and complications were similar in both groups. No significant difference in the overall incidence of recurrent disease at two years was found between patients treated with either DTIC or L-PAM (22% vs 16%, respectively; P = .28). Patients who had perfusion with L-PAM, however, had a lower incidence of in-transit metastasis and recurrence at the scar than those having DTIC therapy (4% vs 12%, P = .06) at two years of follow-up. This preliminary report suggests that L-PAM may be more effective than DTIC in controlling scar recurrences and in-transit metastasis. Continued follow-up of this series of patients, with further analysis of patterns of recurrence and disease-free and overall survival at five years, will be necessary to better define the relative efficacy of L-PAM and DTIC in isolated limb perfusion.