Original Article

Postponing Childbearing and Fertility Preservation in Young Professional Women

Authors: Emily G. Hurley, MD, Ilana B. Ressler, MD, Samantha Young, MD, April Batcheller, MD, Michael A. Thomas, MD, Krystene B. DiPaola, MD, Julie Rios, MD

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate young women’s awareness of ovarian reserve testing and oocyte cryopreservation (OC) and assess how testing ovarian reserve may affect the desire for fertility preservation.

Methods: Three questionnaire-based observational studies were conducted among female students/young professionals 20 years of age and older. The third survey was completed after participants were offered anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) testing. The main outcomes measured included awareness that OC is available, interest in pursuing fertility preservation, and whether interest would change based on knowledge of declining fertility.

Results: The first tier of the study included a survey of a total of 337 women. The majority of female subjects were aware of OC (92.1%). Approximately 38.5% of the women responded that they would consider OC for future fertility purposes. This percentage increased to 60.3% if one was aware her fertility was declining. The second tier of the study included 42 resident/fellow physicians who were offered AMH testing. A survey was completed before and after testing was completed. Approximately 12% of participants stated that their AMH level altered their anticipated age of childbearing, whereas 24% would consider cryopreservation based on their results. The most common concern regarding OC was the cost.

Conclusions: Women should be counseled regarding reproductive aging and options for fertility preservation. Offering ovarian reserve testing and making OC more affordable may increase the number of women who undergo elective OC.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Mathews TJ, Hamilton BE. Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db21.pdf. Published August 2009. Accessed April 23, 2017.
 
2. Goold I, Savulescu J. In favour of freezing eggs for non-medical reasons. Bioethics 2009;23:47-58.
 
3. Dondorp WJ, De Wert GM. Fertility preservation for healthy women: ethical aspects. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1779-1785.
 
4. Martinez G, Daniels K, Chandra A. Fertility of men and women aged 15-44 years in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth, 2006-2010. Natl Health Stat Report 2012;51:1-28.
 
5. Durlinger AL, Visser J, Themmen AP. Regulation of ovarian function: the role of anti- Mullerian hormone. Reproduction 2002;124:601-609.
 
6. de Vet A, Laven JS, de Jong FH, et al. Antimü hormone serum levels: a putative marker for ovarian aging. Fertil Steril 2002;77:357-362.
 
7. Practice Committees of American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2013;99:37-43.
 
8. Harwood K. Egg freezing: a breakthrough for reproductive autonomy? Bioethics 2009;23:39-46.
 
9. Zhang L, Yan LY, Zhi X, et al. Female fertility: is it safe to"freeze?"Chin Med J (Engl) 2015;128:390-397.
 
10. Stoop D, Nekkebroeck J, Devroey P. A survey on the intentions and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons among women of reproductive age. Hum Reprod 2011;26:655-661.
 
11. von Wolff M, Germeyer A, Nawroth F. Fertility preservation for non-medical reasons: controversial, but increasingly common. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015;112:27-32.
 
12. Azhar E, Seifer DB, Melzer K, et al. Knowledge of ovarian reserve and reproductive choices. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015;32:409-415.
 
13. Bavan B, Porzig E, Baker VL. An assessment of female university students’ attitudes toward screening technologies for ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2011;96:1195-1199.
 
14. Rosenblum E. Later, baby: will freezing your eggs free your career? https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-04-17/new-egg-freezing-technology-eases-womens-career-family-angst. Published April 17, 2014. Accessed January 17, 2018.
 
15. Friedman D. Perk up: Facebook and Apple now pay for women to freeze eggs. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/perk-facebook-apple-now-pay-women-freeze-eggs-n225011. Published October 14, 2104. Accessed March 1, 2015.
 
16. Lewis EI, Missmer SA, Farland LV, et al. Public support in the United States for elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril 2016;106:1183-1189.