Original Article

Prevention of Needless Deaths from Drowning

Authors: Jerome H. Modell, MD, DSc (Hon)

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether faulty pool maintenance and substandard lifeguard performance critically delayed retrieval and resuscitation of a significant number of pool drowning victims.


Methods: One hundred and eighty drowning incidents that resulted in litigation from 1998 to 2008 were studied to determine whether faulty pool maintenance and/or substandard lifeguard performance delayed retrieval and thereby contributed to the death of these persons. A total of 180 swimming pools–commercial and private—were included. Ninety-seven of these pools were manned by lifeguards. Subjects who underwent the drowning process and suffered severe brain injury or death were reviewed to determine the rescue and resuscitation attempts by lifeguards or bystanders at the pool.


Results: One hundred and seventy-seven of the 180 persons who underwent the drowning process died. Cases were analyzed as to whether faulty pool maintenance and/or substandard lifeguard performance contributed to their demise. At fault were cloudy or dirty water; drain pipes that created underwater suction to trap victims; inadequate fencing around pools through which small children gained access; permitting small children to be at the pool without adult supervision; permitting dangerous exercises such as hyperventilation while underwater swimming, resulting in shallow water blackout; lifeguards not being attentive, being distracted by other persons, performing nonrelated chores, leaving their positions without proper relief, while failure to enter the water when told persons were submerged.


Conclusion: Faculty pool maintenance and substandard lifeguard performance critically delayed retrieval and resuscitation of a significant number of pool drowning victims.


Key Points


* Poor pool maintenance and substandard lifeguard performance resulted in a delay in retrieval and resuscitation of drowning victims.


* Lifeguards not being attentive to constant surveillance of the pool, being distracted by other persons, performing nonrelated chores, leaving their positions without proper relief, and failure to enter the water when informed of submerged persons placed swimmers at risk.


* Prompt retrieval of drowning swimmers is essential if they are to be resuscitated successfully.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Layon AJ, Modell JH. Drowning: update 2009. Anesthesiology 2009;110:1390–1401.
 
2. Craig AB Jr. Causes of loss of consciousness during underwater swimming. J Appl Physiol 1961;16:583–586.
 
3. Modell JH. Resuscitation after aspiration of chlorinated fresh water. JAMA 1963;185:651–655.
 
4. Idris AH, Berg RA, Bierens J, et al. Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from drowning: the “Utstein Style.” Circulation 2003;108:2565–2574.
 
5. Fenner P, Griffiths T, Osstman M, et al. Lifesaver Surveillance and Scanning: Past Present and Future, in Bierens JJLM (ed): Handbook on Drowning. Heidelberg, Germany, Springer-Verlag, 2006, pp 214–219.