Original Article
Student-Produced Guides alongside First-Year Medical Curriculum: How Peer-Produced Textbooks Change Student Success within Neurology, Cardiopulmonary, and Mixed Systems Courses
Abstract
Objectives: In the United States, medical schools do not have a unified curricular plan that integrates basic sciences and organ-based systems in undergraduate medical education. Instead, institutions rely on independently created lecture material during the first-year medical school curriculum. The drawback to this approach is that no commercial or organizational resources cater to this individualized study plan. This study explored whether students who use student-produced “course guides” experience increased first-year success and improved skills.Methods: First-year students at an allopathic medical school completed anonymous surveys about their reference guide usage, time management, organization, stress level, and examination scores. Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman’s coefficient of correlation and χ2 tests. All of the tests were performed with a significance level of α = 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval.
Results: In total, 186 total students received the survey three times immediately after completing each organ system-based course. A total of n = 49 viable responses were received. One-fourth of the respondents used the guides for ≥3 hours/week. Respondents who used the reference guides reported improved time management, organization, self-confidence, and reduced student stress levels during the first year of medical school, but examination scores were unaffected.
Conclusions: Access to student-produced guides increased confidence in self-rated measures of time management skills, organizational ability, and ability to balance medical course expectations. Because of the small sample size, future work will expand the survey population to increase the power to detect differences in these factors.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Komenda M, Víta M, Vaitsis C, et al. Curriculum mapping with academic analytics in medical and healthcare education. PLoS One 2015;10:e0143748.
2. Dubin B. Innovative curriculum prepares medical students for a lifetime of learning and patient care. Mo Med 2016;113:170–173.
3. Hu Y, Gao H, Wofford MM, et al. A longitudinal study in learning preferences and academic performance in first year medical school. Anat Sci Educ 2018; 11:488–495.
4. Wynter L, Burgess A, Kalman E, et al. Medical students: what educational resources are they using? BMC Med Educ 2019;19:36.
5. Egle JP, Smeenge DM, Kassem KM, et al. The Internet School of Medicine: use of electronic resources by medical trainees and the reliability of those resources. J Surg Educ 2015;72:316–320.
6. Broaddus VC, Grippi MA. Medical subspecialty textbooks in the 21st century. Essential or headed for extinction? Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015;12:1113–1115.
7. Guarino S, Leopardi E, Sorrenti S, et al. Internet-based versus traditional teaching and learning methods. Clin Teach 2014;11:449–453.
8. Peterson MW, Rowat J, Kreiter C, et al. Medical students’ use of information resources: is the digital age dawning? Acad Med 2004;79:89–95.
9. Thompson CL, Schulz WL, Terrence A. A student authored online medical education textbook: editing patterns and content evaluation of a medical student wiki. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2011;2011:1392–1401.
10. Tayler N, Hall S, Carr NJ, et al. Near peer teaching in medical curricula: integrating student teachers in pathology tutorials. Med Educ Online 2015;20:27921.
11. Pujol J, Blanco-Hinojo L, Martínez-Vilavella G, et al. Brain activity during traditional textbook and audiovisual-3D learning. Brain Behav 2019;9:e01427.
12. Fialkowski MK, Calabrese A, Tilinghast B, et al. Open educational resource textbook impact on students in an introductory nutrition course. J Nutr Educ Behav 2020;52:359–368.
13. Ganguly P, Yaqinuddin A, Al-Kattan W, et al. Medical education dilemma: how can we best accommodate basic sciences in a curriculum for 21st century medical students? Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2019;97:293–296.
14. Chen CH, Mullen AJ. COVID-19 can catalyze the modernization of medical education. JMIR Med Educ 2020;6:e19725.
15. Asch DA, Grischkan J, Nicholson S. The cost, price, and debt of medical education. N Engl J Med 2020;383:6–9.
16. Belovich AN, Bahner I, Bonaminio G, et al. USMLE Step-1 is going to pass/ fail. Now what do we do? Med Sci Educ 2021;31:1–6.
17. O’Hanlon R, Laynor G. Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education. J Med Libr Assoc 2019;107:251–257.
18. Choi-Lundberg DL, Low TF, Patman P, et al. Medical student preferences for self-directed study resources in gross anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2016;9: 150–160.
19. Jerant A, Sciolla AF, Henderson MC, et al. Medical student socioeconomic disadvantage, self-designated disadvantage, and subsequent academic performance. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2019;30:1419–1432.
20. Mian A, Kim D, Chen D, et al. Medical student and resident burnout: a review of causes, effects, and prevention. J Fam Med Dis Prev 2018;4:094.
21. Abdulghani HM, AlKanhal AA, Mahmoud ES, et al. Stress and its effects on medical students: a cross-sectional study at a college of medicine in Saudi Arabia. J Health Popul Nutr 2011;29:516–522.
22. Neufeld A, Malin G. How medical students cope with stress: a cross-sectional look at strategies and their sociodemographic antecedents. BMC Med Educ 2021;21:299.
23. Dyrbye L, Shanafelt T. A narrative review on burnout experienced by medical students and residents. Med Educ 2016;50:132–149.
24. Ahmady S, Khajeali N, Kalantarion M, et al. Relation between stress, time management, and academic achievement in preclinical medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Educ Health Promot 2021;10:32.
25. Bassett K, Olbricht GR, Shannon KB. Student preclass preparation by both reading the textbook and watching videos online improves exam performance in a partially flipped course. CBE Life Sci Educ 2020;19:ar32.
26. Murad MH, Varkey P. Self-directed learning in health professions education. Ann Acad Med Singap 2008;37:580–590.
27. Akinla O, Hagan P, Atiomo W. A systematic review of the literature describing the outcomes of near-peer mentoring programs for first year medical students. BMC Med Educ 2018;18:98.
