Original Article

Universal Newborn Screening: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Satisfaction Among Public Health Professionals

Authors: Laurie Dunn, MD, Katherine Gordon, BS, Julia Sein, BS, Kimberly Ross, BS

Abstract

Objective: Assess knowledge, attitude, and satisfaction with the newborn screening (NBS) system among pediatric public health leaders in the state of Florida.


Methods: Online surveys and open-ended telephone interviews were administered to 10 county medical directors for a state-funded program that oversees NBS. Survey questions examined basic knowledge regarding NBS, views on provider and parent access to NBS information, and recommendations for improving the information distribution system.


Results: Providers learn about NBS from the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Department of Health, and continuing medical education; however, 80% of providers were concerned about receiving inadequate information. Thirty percent of the providers surveyed reported that it takes >14 days to receive NBS results. The majority (80%) were concerned that parents may not receive adequate information about their infant’s condition, treatment, or prognosis. No provider reported being confident in his or her ability to assess how well a parent understands a positive NBS result. Eighty percent of those surveyed believe that the pediatric primary care provider is responsible for providing NBS information to parents and almost all of the providers (90%) believed parents should be notified of normal NBS results.


Conclusions: This study indicates dissatisfaction with and confusion about NBS. Addressing this problem requires action at the levels of medical education, clinical care, health policy, and information systems.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Newborn Screening Task Force. Serving the family from birth to the medical home: newborn screening: a blueprint for the future. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 389–427.
 
2. Therrell BL, Johnson A, Williams D. Status of newborn screening programs in the United States. Pediatrics 2006; 117: S212–S252.
 
3. Watson MS, Mann MY, Loyd-Puryear MA, et al. Newborn screening: toward a uniform screening panel and system—executive summary. Pediatrics 2006; 117: S296–S307.
 
4. Kim S, Loyd-Puryear MA, Tonniges TF. Examination of the communication practices between state newborn screening programs and the medical home. Pediatrics 2003; 111: e120–e126.
 
5. Desposito F, Loyd-Puryear MA, Tonniges TF, et al. Survey of pediatrician practices in retrieving statewide authorized newborn screening results. Pediatrics 2001; 108: e22.
 
6. Kemper AR, Uren RL, Moseley KL, et al. Primary care physicians; attitudes regarding follow-up care for children with positive newborn screening results. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 1836–1841.
 
7. Loyd-Puryear MA, Tonniges T, van Dyck PC, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics newborn screening task force recommendations: how far have we come? Pediatrics 2006; 117: S194–S211.
 
8. Davis TC, Humiston SG, Arnold CL, et al. Recommendations for effective newborn screening communication: results of focus groups with parents, providers, and experts. Pediatrics 2006; 117: S326–S340.
 
9. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education program requirements for graduate medical education in pediatrics. http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/downloads/RRC_progReq/320_pediatrics_07012007.pdf. Published July 1, 2007. Accessed October 30, 2011.