Original Article

Venous Lower-Limb Evaluation in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Authors: Fulvio Pomero, MD, Chiara Brignone, MD, Cristina Serraino, MD, Sergio Panzone, MD, Christian Bracco, MD, Elena Migliore, MD, Paola Dalmasso, PD, Paolo Cavallo Perin, MD, PhD, Luigi Maria Fenoglio, MD

Abstract

Objectives: Compressive ultrasonography (CUS) of the lower limbs is the first choice for identifying deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients with symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim of this study was to uncover clinical characteristics and CUS findings in patients with proven PE and their correlations with PE extent.


Methods: A total of 524 consecutive cases of proven symptomatic PE diagnosed between January 1996 and December 2006 were reviewed.


Results: Mean age was 71.06 ± 14.43 SD years; 244 patients (46.6%) were men. DVT signs or symptoms were present in 30.9% of patients and were associated with the femoral site (P= 0.029). CUS was performed in 383 patients (73.1%) and DVT was found in 75.5%. In 94.1% of patients DVT was proximal (popliteal and/or femoral), which would have been then identified by simplified CUS. CUS was performed significantly more often in presence of signs or symptoms of DVT (P < 0.001), less often in presence of medical illnesses (P = 0.040), age ≥75 years (P = 0.001) and death in hospital (P < 0.001). Signs or symptoms of DVT were predictors of positive CUS (P < 0.001), presence of medical illnesses (P = 0.020), central venous catheter (P = 0.035), death in hospital (P = 0.032) were predictors of negative CUS findings. Neither clinical findings nor CUS were associated with PE extent.


Conclusions: In patients with proven symptomatic PE, signs or symptoms of DVT are present only in 1/3 of cases and are significantly more frequent when DVT is extended to the femoral vein. Simplified CUS of the lower limbs has a high sensitivity in finding proximal DVT. CUS is not able to predict PE extent.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Kearon C. Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003;107:I22-I30.
 
2. Galle C, Papazyan JP, Miron MJ, et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism extent by clinical findings, D-dimer level and deep vein thrombosis shown by ultrasound. Thromb Haemost 2001;86:1156-1160.
 
3. Wu AS, Pezzullo JA, Cronan JJ, et al. CT pulmonary angiography: quantification of pulmonary embolus as a predictor of patient outcome-initial experience. Radiology 2004;230:831-835.
 
4. Scarvelis D, Wells PS. Diagnosis and treatment of deep-vein thrombosis. CMAJ 2006;175:1087-1092.
 
5. Lensing AWA, Prandoni P, Brandjes D, et al. Detection of deep vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 1989;320:342-345.
 
6. Schwarz T, Schmidt B, Schmidt B, et al. Interobserver agreement of complete compression ultrasound for clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2002;8:45-49.
 
7. Cogo A, Lensing AW, Prandoni P, et al. Distribution of thrombosis in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. Implications for simplifying the diagnostic process with compression ultrasound. Arch Intern Med 1993;153:2777-2780.
 
8. Girard P, Sanchez O, Leroyer C, et al. Deep venous thrombosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical significance. Chest 2005;128:1593-1600.
 
9. Lusiani L, Visonà A, Bonanome A, et al. The characteristics of the thrombi of the lower limbs, as detected by ultrasonic scanning, do not predict pulmonary embolism. Chest 1996;110:996-1000.
 
10. Wicki J, Perrier A, Perneger T, et al. Predicting adverse outcome in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a risk score. Thromb Haemost 2000;84:548-552.
 
11. Nendaz MR, Bandelier P, Aujesky D, et al. Validation of a risk score identifying patients with acute pulmonary embolism, who are at low risk of clinical adverse outcome. Thromb Haemost 2004;91:1232-1236.
 
12. Biello DR, Mattar AG, McKnight RC, et al. Ventilation-perfusion studies in suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Roentgenol 1979;133:1033-1037.
 
13. Schulman S, Lindmarker P, Holmstrom M, et al. Post-thrombotic syndrome, recurrence, and death 10 years after the first episode of venous thromboembolism treated with warfarin for 6 weeks or 6 months. J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:734-742.
 
14. Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Prins MH, et al. Below-knee elastic compression stockings to prevent the post-thrombotic syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:249-256.
 
15. Prandoni P, Villalta S, Bagatella P, et al. The clinical course of deep-vein thrombosis. Prospective long-term follow-up of 528 symptomatic patients. Haematologica 1997;82:423-428.
 
16. Barrellier MT, Lezin B, Landy S, et al. Prevalence of duplex ultrasonography detectable venous thrombosis in patients with suspected or acute pulmonary embolism J Mal Vasc 2001;26:23-30.
 
17. Coon WW, Willis PW III. Thrombosis of axillary and subclavian veins. Arch Surg 1967;94:657-663.
 
18. Kroger K, Schelo C, Rudofsky G. Colour Doppler sonographic diagnosis of upper limb venous thromboses. Clin Sci 1998;94:657-661.
 
19. Becker DM, Philbrick T, Walker FB IV. Axillary and subclavian venous thrombosis: prognosis and treatment. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:1934-1943.
 
20. Hingorani A, Ascher E, Lorenson E, et al. Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis and its impact on morbidity and mortality rates in a hospital-based population. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:853-860.
 
21. Monreal M, Lafoz E, Ruiz J, et al. Upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a prospective study. Chest 1991;99:280-283.
 
22. Zierler BK. Ultrasonography and diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2004;109(1 suppl):I9-I14.
 
23. Goldhaber SZ, Haire WD, Feldstein ML, et al. Alteplase versus heparin in acute pulmonary embolism: randomized trial assessing right ventricular function and pulmonary perfusion. Lancet 1993;341:507-511.
 
24. Wolfe MW, Lee RT, Feldstein ML, et al. Prognostic significance of right ventricular hypokinesis and perfusion lung scan defects in pulmonary embolism. Am Heart J 1994;127:1371-1375.
 
25. Ribeiro A, Juhlin-Dannfelt A, Brodin LA. Pulmonary embolism: relation between the degree of right ventricle overload and the extent of perfusion defects. Am Heart J 1998;135:868-874.
 
26. Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Olschewski M, et al. Association between thrombolytic treatment and the prognosis of hemodynamically stable patients with major pulmonary embolism. Circulation 1997;96:882-888.
 
27. Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry. Lancet 1999;353:1386-1389.
 
28. Qanadli SD, El Hajjam M, Vieillard-Baron A, et al. New CT index to quantify arterial obstruction in pulmonary embolism: comparison with angiographic index and echocardiography. Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1415-1420.
 
29. Ghanima W, Abdelnoor M, Dolmen LO, et al. The association between the proximal extension of the clot and the severity of pulmonary embolism (PE): a proposal for a new radiological score for PE. J Intern Med 2007;261:74-81.