Table 1. Total alternative metric mentions for retracted articles
Table 2. Mean alternative metric mentions for retracted articles
Table 3. Percentage of total alternative metric mentions per time period for retracted articles
1. Callaway E. Will the pandemic permanently alter scientific publishing? Nature 2020;582:167–168.
2. Bagdasarian N, Cross GB, Fisher D. Rapid publications risk the integrity of science in the era of COVID-19. BMC Med 2020;18:192.
3. Palayew A, Norgaard O, Safreed-Harmon K, et al. Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge. Nat Hum Behav 2020;4:666–669.
4. Fraser N, Brierley L, Dey G, et al. The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape. PLOS Biol 2021;19:e3000959.
5. Bramstedt KA. The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality. J Med Ethics 2020;46:803–807.
6. Yeo-Teh NSL, Tang BL. An alarming retraction rate for scientific publications on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Account Res 2021;28:47–53.
7. Khatter A, Naughton M, Dambha-Miller H, et al. Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID-19 research papers. Learn Publ 2021. DOI: 10.1002/leap.1403.
8. Anderson C, Nugent K, Peterson C. Academic journal retractions and the COVID19 pandemic. J Prim Care Community Health 2021;12:21501327211015592.
9. Trueger NS, Thoma B, Hsu CH, et al. The Altmetric score: a new measure for article-level dissemination and impact. Ann Emerg Med 2015;66:549–553.
10. Melero R. Altmetrics—a complement to conventional metrics. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2015;25:152–160.
11. Peterson CJ, Anderson C, Nugent K. Alternative publication metrics in the time of COVID-19. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2021;35:43–45.
12. Steen RG, Casadevall A, Fang FC. Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? PLoS One 2013;8:e68397.
13. Serghiou S, Marton RM, Ioannidis JPA. Media and social media attention to retracted articles according to Altmetric. PLoS One 2021;16:e0248625.
14. West JD, Bergstrom CT. Misinformation in and about science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2021;118:e1912444117.
15. Fioranelli M, Sepehri A, Roccia MG, et al. RETRACTED: 5G technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2020;34. DOI: 10.23812/20-269-E-4R.
16. Allington D, Duffy B, Wessely S, et al. Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychol Med 2021;51:1763–1769.
17. Romer D, Jamieson KH. Patterns of media use, strength of belief in COVID19 conspiracy theories, and the prevention of COVID-19 from March to July 2020 in the United States: survey study. J Med Internet Res 2021;23:e25215.
18. Islam MS, Kamal A-HM, Kabir A, et al. COVID-19 vaccine rumors and conspiracy theories: the need for cognitive inoculation against misinformation to improve vaccine adherence. PLoS One 2021;16:e0251605.
19. Bierwiaczonek K, Kunst JR, Pich O. Belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories reduces social distancing over time. Appl Psychol Health Well Being 2020;12: 1270–1285.
20. Jan R, Zainab T. The impact story of retracted articles Altmetric it! Paper presented at 5th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (ETTLIS); New Dehli; February 21–23, 2018.