Original Article

Does the Addition of Vocera Hands-Free Communication Device Improve Interruptions in an Academic Emergency Department?

Authors: Amy A. Ernst, MD, FACEP, Steven J. Weiss, MD, MS, Jeffrey A. Reitsema, MD

Abstract

Objective: Emergency department (ED) interruptions occur frequently. Recently, a hands-free communication device (HCD; Vocera) was added to the population of communications devices (a cellular telephone and a pager) in our ED. The research purpose was to determine whether this addition improved interruption times and our hypothesis was the device would decrease length of interruptions.


Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of interruptions in an academic ED level 1 trauma center before and after introduction of an HCD. Interruptions were defined a priori and based on previous literature. We studied a convenience sampling of shifts. Length of interruption time was recorded. Three investigators collected interruption data, including nine different ED attendings.


Results: Of 511 interruptions, there were no significant differences in types of interruptions pre- versus post-HCD. Before HCD use, we collected 40 hours of data with 65 interruptions (mean 1.6/hour). Post-HCD, 180 hours of data were collected with 446 interruptions (mean 2.5/hour). There was a significant difference in length of time of interruptions, with an average of 9 minutes pre-HCD versus 4 minutes post-HCD (P = 0.012 diff 4.9; 95% confidence interval 1.8–8.1). HCD calls were significantly shorter than non-HCD calls (1 vs 5 minutes; P < 0.001). Comparing data collectors for type of interruption during the same 4-hour shift resulted in κ = 0.73.


Conclusions: The addition of Vocera HCD may improve interruptions by shortening call length.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first.

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view your purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($15)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Chisholm CD, Weaver CS, Whenmouth L, et al. A task analysis of emergency physician activities in academic and community settings. Ann Emerg Med 2011; 58: 117–122.
 
2. Jeanmonod R, Boyd M, Loewenthal M, et al. The nature of emergency department interruptions and their impact on patient satisfaction. Emerg Med J 2010; 27: 376–379.
 
3. De Grood J, Wallace JE, Friesen ST, et al. Evaluation of a hands-free communication device in an acute care setting. Comput Inform Nurs 2012; 30: 148–156.
 
4. Richardson JE, Ash JS. The effects of hands-free communication device systems: communication changes in hospital organizations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010; 17: 91–98.
 
5. Richardson JE, Shah-Hosseini S, Fiadjoe JE, et al. The effects of a hands-free communication device system in a surgical suite. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18: 70–72.
 
6. Richardson JE, Ash JS. The effects of hands free communication devices on clinical communication: balancing communication access needs with user control. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008: 621–625.
 
7. Richards JD, Harris T. Beam me up Scotty! Impact of personal wireless communication devices in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2011; 28: 29–32.
 
8. St Jacques PS, France DJ, Pilla M, et al. Evaluation of a hands-free wireless communication device in the perioperative environment. Telemed J E Health 2006; 12: 42–49.
 
9. Chisholm CD, Collison EK, Nelson DR, et al. Emergency department workplace interruptions: are emergency physicians “interrupt-driven” and “multitasking”? Acad Emerg Med 2000; 7: 1239–1243.
 
10. Chisholm CD, Dornfeld AM, Nelson DR, et al. Work interrupted: a comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38: 146–151.
 
11. Spencer R, Colera E, Logan P. Variation in communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2004; 44: 268–273.
 
12. Westbrook JI, Colera E, Dunsmuir WT, et al. The impact of interruptions on clinical task completion. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19: 284–289.
 
13. Coiera EW, Jayasuriya RA, Hardy J, et al. Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department. Med J Aust 2002; 176: 415–418.
 
14. Dunphy H, Finlay JL, Lemaire J, et al. Hands-free communication technology; a benefit for nursing? J Nurs Adm 2011; 41: 365–368.
 
15. Westbrook JI, Woods A, Rob MI, et al. Association of interruptions with an increased risk and severity of medication administration errors. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170: 683–690.