Spirituality/Medicine Interface Project

A Prevalence Study of Faith-based Healing in the Rural Southeastern United States

Authors: Sharon K. Hull, MD, MPH, Timothy P. Daaleman, DO, MPH, Samruddhi Thaker, MBBS, MHA, Donald E. Pathman, MD, MPH

Abstract

Background:Although prayer and other spiritual practices are common among residents of the rural south, the use of faith-based healers (FBH), or healers who use prayer as their primary healing modality, has not been explored in this population. Methods:Secondary data analysis from a random digit dialing telephone survey of rural adults in eight southern states. Results:Our overall response rate was 51% and 193 subjects (4.1%) had seen an FBH practitioner within the previous year. FBH use was significantly more common among younger respondents (OR 7.21, 95% CI 2.00, 25.94), women (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.03, 2.14), those reporting poorer health (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.19, 2.83), and those who believed in avoiding physicians (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.24, 2.67). A relationship between FBH use and delayed or foregone medical care, and cost as a barrier to obtaining care was not statistically significant after controlling for other factors. Conclusions:Prevalence of FBH use is low, but is significantly related to younger age, female gender, poorer health status, barriers to medical care and devaluing medical care. Clinicians may consider exploring FBH usage with their younger, female patients, and those in poorer health. Policy makers should consider how FBH usage is related to various indicators of health care services demand, utilization and access.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Koenig HG, McCullough ME, Larson DB. Handbook of Religion and Health. New York, Oxford University Press; 2001.
 
2. Kalb C. Faith & Healing. Newsweek. 2003 November 10, 2003:44–56.
 
3. McCaffrey AM, Eisenberg DM, Legedza AT, et al. Prayer for health concerns: results of a national survey on prevalence and patterns of use. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:858–862.
 
4. Barnes PM, Powell-Griner E, McFann K, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Adv Data 2004 May;27:1–19.
 
5. Glik DC. Psychosocial wellness among spiritual healing participants. Soc Sci Med 1986;22:579–586.
 
6. Glik DC. Symbolic, ritual and social dynamics of spiritual healing. Soc Sci Med 1988;27:1197–1206.
 
7. Swan R. Faith healing, Christian Science, and the medical care of children. N Engl J Med1983;309:1639–1641.
 
8. King DE, Sobal J, DeForge BR. Family practice patients’ experiences and beliefs in faith healing. J Fam Pract 1988;27:505–508.
 
9. Mansfield CJ, Mitchell J, King DE. The doctor as God’s mechanic? Beliefs in the Southeastern United States. Soc Sci Med 2002;54:399–409.
 
10. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA 1998;280:1569–1575.
 
11. Shumay DM, Maskarinec G, Kakai H, et al. Why some cancer patients choose complementary and alternative medicine instead of conventional treatment. J Fam Pract 2001;50:1067.
 
12. Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. JAMA 1998;279:1548–1553.
 
13. Rural Health Policy Center PSU. Southern Rural Access Program. Available at: http://www.srap.org. Accessed July 4, 2004.
 
14. The Commonwealth Fund. Survey on Disparities in Quality of Health Care: Spring 2001. Available at:http://www.cmwf.org/usr_doc/qualitysurvey_2001_questionnaire.pdf. Accessed September 28, 2004.
 
15. Center for Studying Health System Change. Design and Methods for the Community Tracking Survey. Available at: http://www.hschange.org/index.cgi?data=01. Accessed September 28, 2004.
 
16. Sheps CG, Wagner EH, Schonfeld WH, et al. An evaluation of subsidized rural primary care programs: I. A typology of practice organizations. Am J Public Health 1983;73:38–49.
 
17. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Available at:http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/. Accessed September 28, 2004.
 
18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/. Accessed September 28, 2004.
 
19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Available at:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm. Accessed September 28, 2004.
 
20. Sharp K, Ross CE, Cockerham WC. Symptoms, beliefs, and the use of physician services among the disadvantaged. J Health Soc Behav 1983;24:255–263.
 
21. Stata Corporation. Stata Statistical Software, Version 8.2. College Station, Texas, 2004.
 
22. The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Available at: http://www.aapor.org. Accessed October 19, 2004.
 
23. Thomas R, Purdon S. Telephone Methods for Social Surveys. Social Research Update, Issue Eight. 1994. Available at: http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU8.html. Accessed October 19, 2004.
 
24. CyBulski KA, Sinclair M, Potter F, Ciemnecki AB. Adjusting for Nonresponse Among Medicaid Households That Could Not Be Located or Were Located but Did Not Participated in the Minnesota Managed Care Survey. Available at: http://www.jpsm.umd.edu/icsn/papers/cybulski.htm. Accessed October 19, 2004.
 
25. Kessler RC, Davis RB, Foster DF, et al. Long-term trends in the use of complementary and alternative medical therapies in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:262–268.
 
26. Wolsko PM, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, et al. Use of mind-body medical therapies. J Gen Intern Med2004;19:43–50.
 
27. Paramore LC. Use of alternative therapies: estimates from the 1994 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation National Access to Care Survey. J Pain Symptom Manage 1997;13:83–99.
 
28. Simile C, Ni H. Use of Spiritual Healing Therapy in Relation to Race and Ethnicity. 2002 Data Users Conference, July 15–17, 2002.Washington, DC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics, 2002.
 
29. Mackenzie ER, Taylor L, Bloom BS, et al. Ethnic minority use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM): a national probability survey of CAM utilizers. Altern Ther Health Med 2003;9:50–56.
 
30. Wolsko PM, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, et al. Insurance coverage, medical conditions, and visits to alternative medicine providers: results of a national survey. Arch of Intern Med 2002;162:281–287.
 
31. Ni H, Simile C, Hardy AM. Utilization of complementary and alternative medicine by United States adults: results from the 1999 national health interview survey. Med Care 2002;40:353–358.
 
32. Mokdad AH, Stroup DF, Giles WH, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Team. Public health surveillance for behavioral risk factors in a changing environment. Recommendations from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Team. MMWR Recomm Rep 2003;52 (RR09):1–12.
 
33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2003 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Summary Data Quality Report. Available at:http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/technical_infodata/pdf/2003SummaryDataQualityReport.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2004.
 
34. Keeter S, Miller C, Kohut A, et al. Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opin Q 2000;64:125–148.