Abstract
Background Research demonstrates that religious values clearly impact on the judgments made by physicians and their patients. One basic dichotomy—belief in ethical values that do not change (absolute values) versus belief in values that change depending on the situation (relative values)—has recently been experimentally associated with different ethical decision-making patterns. Methods An anonymous, randomized, national survey and 1-week response prompt with 1-month follow-up mailing as necessary were distributed to nationwide samples of board-certified American family practitioners and psychiatrists. Physicians answered descriptive questions and standardized personality assessments and responded to three vignettes describing ethically sensitive scenarios concerning birth control medication for sexually active single women, euthanasia, and abortion. Results Response rates were 34% for psychiatrists and 38% for family practitioners. Family practitioners and absolutists were significantly more supportive of religious activities and had more religious parents than psychiatrists and relativists. Furthermore, family practitioners and absolutists were less approving of the vignettes than other groups. Conclusion Family practitioners were more supportive of religious activities than psychiatrists as reported in previous research. The absolute versus relative value dichotomy is a useful concept in examining physician attitudes as they affect health care and personal behavior. However, questions concerning place of worship attendance and giving in addition to specific religious value labels may be more efficient experimentally. Physicians should be aware of their own biases in discussions with patients, families, and other health care providers.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
References
References 1. Olive KE. Physician religious beliefs and the physician-patient relationship: A study of devout physicians. South Med J 1995; 88: 1249–1255.OliveKEPhysician religious beliefs and the physician-patient relationship: A study of devout physiciansSouth Med J1995881249 2. Neumann JK, Olive KE, McVeigh SD. Absolute versus relative values: Effects on medical decisions and personality of patients and physicians. South Med J 1999; 92: 871–876.NeumannJK]]OliveKE]]McVeighSDAbsolute versus relative values: Effects on medical decisions and personality of patients and physiciansSouth Med J199992871 3. Neumann JK, Leppien FV. Influence of physicians’ religious values on inservice training decisions. J Psychol Theol 1997; 15: 427–436.NeumannJK]]LeppienFVInfluence of physicians’ religious values on inservice training decisionsJ Psychol Theol199715427 4. Neeleman J, King MB. Psychiatrists’ religious attitudes in relation to their clinical practice: A survey of 231 psychiatrists. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993; 88: 420–424.NeelemanJ]]KingMBPsychiatrists’ religious attitudes in relation to their clinical practice: A survey of 231 psychiatristsActa Psychiatr Scand199388420 5. Daaleman TP, Frey B. Spiritual and religious beliefs and practices of family physicians: A national survey. J Fam Pract 1999; 48: 98–104.DaalemanTP]]FreyBSpiritual and religious beliefs and practices of family physicians: A national surveyJ Fam Pract19994898 6. Neumann JK, Leppien FV. Impact of religious values and medical specialty on professional inservice decisions. J Psychol Theol 1997; 25: 437–448.NeumannJK]]LeppienFVImpact of religious values and medical specialty on professional inservice decisionsJ Psychol Theol199725437 7. Neumann JK, Harvill LM, Callahan M. Impact of humanistic, liberal Christian, and evangelical Christian values on the self-reported opinions of radiologists and psychiatrists. J Psychol Theol 1995; 23: 198–206.NeumannJK]]HarvillLM]]CallahanMImpact of humanistic, liberal Christian, and evangelical Christian values on the self-reported opinions of radiologists and psychiatristsJ Psychol Theol199523198 8. Dillman DA. Mail and Telephone Surveys. New York, Wiley-Interscience, 1978. 9. McCullough ME, Rachal KC, Sandage SJ, Worthington EL Jr, Brown SW, Hight TL. Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: Part II—Theoretical elaboration and measurement. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 75: 1586–1603.McCulloughME]]RachalKC]]SandageSJ]]WorthingtonEL]]BrownSW]]HightTLInterpersonal forgiving in close relationships: Part II—Theoretical elaboration and measurementJ Pers Soc Psychol1998751586 10. Ketterer MW, Huffman J, Lumley MA, Wassef S, Gray L, Kenyon L, et al. Five-year follow-up for adverse outcomes in males with at least minimally positive angiograms: Importance of “denial” in assessing psychosocial risk factors. J Psychosom Res 1998; 44: 241–250.KettererMW]]HuffmanJ]]LumleyMA]]WassefS]]GrayL]]KenyonLFive-year follow-up for adverse outcomes in males with at least minimally positive angiograms: Importance of “denial” in assessing psychosocial risk factorsJ Psychosom Res199844241 11. Levin JS, Larson DB, Puchalski CM. Religion and spirituality in medicine: Research and education. JAMA 1997; 278: 792–793.LevinJS]]LarsonDB]]PuchalskiCMReligion and spirituality in medicine: Research and educationJAMA1997278792 12. Sloan RP, Bagiella E, Powell T. Religion, spirituality, and medicine. Lancet 1999; 353: 664–667.SloanRP]]BagiellaE]]PowellTReligion, spirituality, and medicineLancet1999353664 13. Gartner J, Larson OB, Allen GP. Religious commitment and mental health: A review of the empirical literature. J Psychol Theol 1991; 19: 6–25.GartnerJ]]LarsonOB]]AllenGPReligious commitment and mental health: A review of the empirical literatureJ Psychol Theol1991196 14. Marx JH, Spray SL. Religious biographies and professional characteristics of psychotherapists. J Health Soc Behav 1969; 10: 275–288.MarxJH]]SpraySLReligious biographies and professional characteristics of psychotherapistsJ Health Soc Behav196910275 15. Emanuel EJ, Fairclough DL, Emanuel LL. Attitudes and desires related to euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide among terminally ill patients and their caregivers. JAMA 2000; 284: 2460–2468.EmanuelEJ]]FaircloughDL]]EmanuelLLAttitudes and desires related to euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide among terminally ill patients and their caregiversJAMA20002842460 16. Dans PE. Medical students and abortion: Reconciling personal beliefs and professional roles at one medical school. Acad Med 1992; 67: 207–211.DansPEMedical students and abortion: Reconciling personal beliefs and professional roles at one medical schoolAcad Med199267207 17. Astrow AB, Puchalski CM, Sulmasy DP. Religion, spirituality, and health care: Social, ethical, and practical considerations. Am J Med 2001; 110: 283–287.AstrowAB]]PuchalskiCM]]SulmasyDPReligion, spirituality, and health care: Social, ethical, and practical considerationsAm J Med2001110283
