Expired CME Article
Adult Health Screening and Referral in the Emergency Department
Abstract
Introduction:The United States Public Health Service (USPHS) recommends using all available patient encounters to provide preventive healthcare to patients. Many studies have demonstrated the importance of performing preventive care in the emergency department (ED). These studies have used the ED as a location for patient identification and treatment, rather than as a referral site. The primary objective of this study was to identify and refer patients with unmet healthcare needs seen in the Emergency Department. A secondary objective was to determine if the patient would accept health referrals and follow-up with a doctor or clinic. Methods:Age and gender-specific algorithms were developed from the USPHS Clinicians' Book of Preventative Health, Second Edition. A convenience sample of patients who presented to the emergency department was asked to participate in the study to obtain 50 subjects in each age and gender grouping. After one week the patients were followed up by telephone, and after one month the computer database was queried to confirm that an appointment had been made with a doctor or clinic as recommended. Results:Three hundred and twelve patients in the Emergency Department were enrolled in the study. The demographic profile of the patients surveyed consisted of 152 (48.7%) African Americans, 81 (26.0%) Hispanics, and 12 (3.8%) Caucasians. Of those enrolled, 59.9% had a primary care physician, and 78.2% had insurance coverage. The study revealed that 28.8% of the subjects did not need a referral, 51.3% needed 1 to 3 referrals, and 19.9% needed 4 to 8 referrals. The most common needs were for tetanus immunizations (41.2%) and stool for occult blood (41.0%); the least common was for Pap smears (2.6%) and blood pressure (2.0%). Most patients accepted the referrals (88.3%), but only a fourth of those (22.6%) reported making a follow-up appointment. The appointment was confirmed in the computer system in 39.6% of the cases. The highest rate of follow-up was for prostate screening (41.4%); the least was for drug abuse (0.0%). Conclusion:Most of the patients in this study were found to have unmet healthcare needs. Many of the patients were given referrals and followed up with the clinic or physician for the healthcare problems identified. This study reinforces the value of the USPHS guideline to use all available patient encounters for preventive healthcare.This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. United States Public Health Service. The Clinician's Handbook of Preventative Services. Germantown, MD: International Publishing, 1998, 2nd ed.
2. The role of emergency physicians in promoting health and preventing disease. Available at:http://www.acep.org/1,174,0.html. Accessed January 14, 2003.
3. American College of Emergency Physicians. The role of the emergency physician in promoting health and preventing disease. Available at: http://www.acep.org/1,174,0.html. Accessed January 14, 2003.
4. Rhodes KV, Gordon JA, Lowe RA. Preventative care in the emergency department, Part I: Clinical preventative services—are they relevant to Emergency Medicine? Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1036–1041.
5. Babcock IC, Wyer PC, Gerson LW. Preventive care in the emergency department, Part II: Clinical preventive services- an emergency medicine evidence-based review. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1042–1054.
6. Berstein SL, Becker BM. Preventive care in the emergency department: diagnosis and management of smoking and smoking-related illness in the emergency department: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:720–729.
7. Rodriguez RM, Kreider WJ, Baraff LJ. Need and desire for preventive care measures in emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:615–620.
8. Williams JM, Chinnis AC, Gutman D. Health promotion practices of emergency physicians. Am J Emerg Med 2000;18:17–21.
9. Richman PB, Dinowitz S, Nashed AH, et al. The emergency department as a potential site for smoking cessation intervention: a randomized, controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:348–353.
10. Berstein E, Berstein J, Levenson S. Project ASSERT: An ED-based intervention to increase access to primary care, preventive services and the substance abuse treatment system. Ann Emerg Med1997;30:181–189.
11. Chandra A, Compton S, Sachor M, et al. Untreated hypercholesterolemia in an emergency department chest pain observation unit population. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:699–702.
12. Polis MA, Davey VJ, Collins ED, et al. The emergency department as part of a successful strategy for increasing adult immunization. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17:1016–1018.
13. Hibbs JR, Ceglowski WS, Goldberg M, et al. Emergency department-based surveillance for syphilis during an outbreak in Philadelphia. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:1286–1290.
14. Madden C, Cole TB. Emergency intervention to break the cycle of drunken driving and recurrent injury. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:177–179.
15. Baraff LJ, Penna RD, Williams N, Sanders A. Practice guidelines for the ED management of falls in community-dwelling elderly persons. Kaiser Permanente Medical Group. Ann Emerg Med 1997;30:480–492.
16. Ernst AA, Samuels JD, Winsemius DK. Emergency department screening for syphilis in patients with other suspected sexually transmitted diseases. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:627–630.
17. Slobodkin D, Zielske PG, Kitlas JL, et al. Demonstration of the feasibility of emergency department immunization against influenza and pneumococcus. Ann Emerg Med 1998;32:537–543.
18. Rodriguez RM, Baraff LJ. Emergency department immunization of the elderly with pneumococcal and influenza vaccines. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:1729–1732.
19. Stack SJ, Martin DR, Plouffe JF. An emergency department-based pneumococcal vaccination program could save money and lives. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:299–303.
20. Ernst AA, Romolu R, Nick TL. Emergency department screening for syphilis in pregnant care. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:781–785.
21. Hogness CG, Engelstad LP, Linck LM, et al. Cervical cancer screening in an urban emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:933–939.
22. D'Onofrio G, Bernstein E, Bernstein J, et al. Patients with alcohol problems in the emergency department, part 1: improving detection. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5:1200–1209.
23. Schriger DL, Gibbons PS, Langone CA, et al. Enabling the diagnosis of occult psychiatric illness in the emergency department: a randomized, controlled trial of the computerized, self-administered PRIME-MD diagnostic system. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:132–140.
24. Robinson PF, Gausche M, Gerardi MJ, et al. Immunization of the pediatric patient in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1996;28:334–341.
25. Cherpitel CJ, Soghikian K Hurley LB. Alcohol-related health services use and identification of patients in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1996;28:418–423.
26. Lo Vecchio F, Bhatia A, Sciallo D. Screening for domestic violence in the emergency department.Eur J Emerg Med 1998;5:441–444.
27. Feldhaus KM, Koziol-McLain J, Amsbury HL, et al. Accuracy of 3 brief screening questions for detecting partner violence in the emergency department. JAMA 1997;277:1357–1361.
28. Buchsbaum DG, Buchanan RG, Centor RM, et al. Screening for alcohol abuse using CAGE scores and likelihood ratios. Ann Intern Med 1991;115:774–777.
29. Bush B, Shaw S, Cleary P, et al. Screening for alcohol abuse using the CAGE questionnaire. Am J Med 1987;82:231–235.
30. Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism: The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA 1984;252:1905–1907.
31. Rhodes KV, Lauderdale DS, Stocking CB, et al. Better health while you wait: a controlled trial of a computer-based intervention for screening and health promotion in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:284–291.
32. Raines JR, Ellis LB. A conversational microcomputer based health risk appraisal. Computer Programs Biomed 1987;14:175–184.
33. Kemper KJ. Self-administered questionnaire for structured psychosocial screening in pediatrics.Pediatrics 1992;89:433–436.
34. Lutner RE, Roizen MF, Stocking CB, et al. The automated interview versus the personal interview. Do patient responses to preoperative health questions differ? Anesthesiology 1991;75:394–400.
35. Thomas EJ, Burstin HR, O'Neil AC, et al. Patient noncompliance with medical advice after the emergency department visit. Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:49–55.
36. Fields DL, Hedges JR. Arnold, KJ, Goodstein-Wayne, B, Rouan, GW. Limitations of chest pain follow-up from an urban teaching hospital emergency department. J Emerg Med 1988;6:363–368.
37. Murray MJ, LeBlanc CH. Clinic follow-up from the emergency department: do patients show up? Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:56–58.
38. Magnusson AR, Hedges JR, Vanko M, et al. Follow-up compliance after emergency department evaluation. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:560–567.
39. Vukmir RB, Kremen R, Ellis GL, et al. Compliance with emergency department referral: the effect of computerized discharge instructions. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:819–823.
40. Jacobs DH, Tovar JM, Hung OL, et al. Behavioral risk factor and preventive health practice survey of immigrants in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:599–608.
41. Adams SL, Thompson DA. Inability to follow up ED patients by telephone: There must be 50 ways to leave your number. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:271–273.
