Review Article
An Approach to Gynecomastia in Primary Care Clinics
Abstract
Gynecomastia is a more common finding in primary care clinics than is recognized. Because this finding can be easily overlooked, appropriate investigation and management often are missed. The workup of gynecomastia is highly individualized, based on the patient’s presentation and related factors. It should be guided by thorough history taking and physical examination. Unless the patient has associated symptoms, or there is suspicion for an underlying clinical disorder causing the gynecomastia, the patient need not be investigated further. A breast ultrasound is not routinely recommended. Gynecomastia is a benign finding that will spontaneously regress in most patients; however, patients who are concerned with their physical appearance can be treated either medically or surgically. Patients who have had gynecomastia for more than 1 year tend to have fibrosis, which may be more difficult to treat. Management of gynecomastia is highly patient centered, following a detailed discussion about treatment goals and should be started early. Gynecomastia is not considered a premalignant condition; routine screening is not cost-effective, and imaging studies should be pursued only if physical examination findings suggest malignancy.This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Williams MJ. Gynecomastia: its incidence, recognition, and host characterization in 447 autopsy cases. Am J Med 1963;34:103–112.
2. Kanakis GA, Nordkap L, Bang AK, et al. EAA clinical practice guidelines— gynecomastia evaluation and management. Andrology 2019;7:778–793.
3. Nuttall FQ. Gynecomastia as a physical finding in normal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1979;48:338–340.
4. Niewoehner CB, Nuttal FQ. Gynecomastia in a hospitalized male population. Am J Med 1984;77:633–638.
5. Costanzo PR, Pacenza NA, Aszpis SM, et al. Clinical and etiological aspects of gynecomastia in adult males: a multicenter study. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018:8364824.
6. Kim MS, Kim JH, Lee KH, et al. Incidental gynecomastia on thoracic computed tomography in clinical practice: characteristics, radiologic features, and correlation with possible causes in South Korean Men. Am J Mens Health 2020;14:1557988320908102.
7. Ersöz HO, Önde ME, Terekeci H, et al. Causes of gynaecomastia in young adult males and factors associated with idiopathic gynaecomastia. Int J Androl 2002;5:312–316.
8. Carlson HE. Approach to the patient with gynecomastia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:15–21.
9. Eckman A, Dobs A. Drug-induced gynecomastia. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2008;7:691–702.
10. Derkacz M, Chmiel-Perzyńska I, Nowakowski A. Gynecomastia—a difficult diagnostic problem. Endokrynol Pol 2011;62:190–202.
11. Dickson G. Gynecomastia. Am Fam Physician 2012 Apr 1;85(7):716–22.
12. MessinaM. Soybean isoflavone exposure does not have feminizing effects on men: a critical examination of the clinical evidence. Fertil Steril 2010;93:2095–2104.
13. de Luis DA, Aller R, Cuéllar LA, et al. Anabolizantes esteroideos y ginecomastia. Revisión de la literatura [Anabolic steroids and gynecomastia. Review of the literature]. An Med Interna 2001;18:489–491.
14. Hassan HC, Cullen IM, Casey RG, et al. Gynaecomastia: an endocrine manifestation of testicular cancer. Andrologia 2008;40:152–157.
15. Evans DL, Pantanowitz L, Dezube BJ, et al. Breast enlargement in 13 men who were seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis 2002;35:1113–1119.
16. Di Grezia G, Romano T, De Francesco F, et al. Breast ultrasound in the management of gynecomastia in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome in monozygotic twins: two case reports. J Med Case Rep 2014;8:440.
17. Braunstein GD. Clinical practice. Gynecomastia. N Engl J Med 2007;357: 1229–1237.
18. Lawrence SE, Faught KA, Vethamuthu J, et al. Beneficial effects of raloxifene and tamoxifen in the treatment of pubertal gynecomastia. J Pediatr 2004;145:71–76.
19. Chau A, Jafarian N, Rosa M. Male breast: clinical and imaging evaluations of benign and malignant entities with histologic correlation. Am J Med 2016;129:776–791.
20. Boccardo F, Rubagotti A, Battaglia M, et al. Evaluation of tamoxifen and anastrozole in the prevention of gynecomastia and breast pain induced by bicalutamide monotherapy of prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:808–815.
21. Perdonà S, Autorino R, De Placido S, et al. Efficacy of tamoxifen and radiotherapy for prevention and treatment of gynaecomastia and breast pain caused by bicalutamide in prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:295–300.
22. Evans DG, Susnerwala I, Dawson J, et al. Risk of breast cancer in male BRCA2 carriers. J Med Genet 2010;47:710–711.
23. Niewoehner CB, Schorer AE. Gynaecomastia and breast cancer in men. BMJ 2008;336:709–713.
24. Brinton LA, Cook MB, McCormack V, et al. Anthropometric and hormonal risk factors for male breast cancer: male breast cancer pooling project results. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106:djt465.
25. Zurrida S, Nolè F, Bonanni B, et al. Male breast cancer. Future Oncol 2010; 6:985–991.
26. Kim SH, Kim YS. Ultrasonographic and mammographic findings of male breast disease. J Ultrasound Med 2019;38:243–252.
27. Khan NAJ, Tirona M. An updated review of epidemiology, risk factors, and management of male breast cancer. Med Oncol 2021;38:39.
28. Ordaz DL, Thompson JK. Gynecomastia and psychological functioning: a review of the literature. Body Image 2015;15:141–148.
