Original Article

ASA Classification Pre-Endoscopic Procedures: A Retrospective Analysis on the Accuracy of Gastroenterologists

Authors: Shoba Theivanayagam, MD, Kristi T. Lopez, MD, Michelle L. Matteson-Kome, PhD, Matthew L. Bechtold, MD, Akwi W. Asombang, MD, MPH

Abstract

Objectives: Before an endoscopic procedure, an evaluation to assess the risk of sedation is performed by the gastroenterologist. To risk stratify based on medical problems, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification scores are used routinely in the preprocedure evaluation. The objective of our study was to evaluate among physicians the ASA score accuracy pre-endoscopic procedures.

Methods: At a single tertiary-care center an institutional review board–approved retrospective study was performed. Upper endoscopies performed from May 2012 through August 2013 were reviewed; data were collected and recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and linear weighted kappa analysis for agreement (≤0.20 is poor agreement, 0.21–0.40 is fair, 0.41–0.60 is moderate, 0.61–0.80 is good, and 0.81–1.00 is very good).

Results: The mean ASA scores by the gastroenterologist compared with the anesthesiologist were 2.28 ± 0.56 and 2.78 ± 0.60, respectively, with only fair agreement (weighted kappa index 0.223, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.113–0.333; 48% agreement). The mean ASA scores for gastroenterologists compared with other gastroenterologists were 2.26 ± 0.5 and 2.26 ± 0.44, respectively, with poor agreement (weighted kappa index 0.200, 95% CI 0.108–0.389; 68% agreement). Agreement on ASA scores was only moderate between the gastroenterologist and himself or herself (weighted kappa index 0.464, 95% CI 0.183–0.745; 75% agreement).

Conclusions: Gastroenterologists performing preprocedure assessments of ASA scores have fair agreement with anesthesiologists, poor agreement with other gastroenterologists, and only moderate agreement with themselves. Given this level of inaccuracy, it appears that the ASA score pre-endoscopy is of limited significance.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 1941;2:281-284.
 
2. Owens WD. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System is not a risk classification system. Anesthesiology 2001;94:378.
 
3. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963;24:111.
 
4. Claudio AR, Wagner M, Sigurdsson G, et al. The ASA-Physical Status Classification predicts not only short-term but also long-term outcome in patients undergoing liver resection. Paper presented at: American Society of Anesthesiologists meeting. October 21, 2008 Orlando, FL A1183.
 
5. Tiret L, Hatton F, Desmonts JM, et al. Prediction of outcome of anaesthesia in patients over 40 years: a multifactorial risk index. Stat Med 1988;7:947-954.
 
6. Wolters U, Wolf T, Stü H, et al. ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 1996;77:217-222.
 
7. Ranta S, Hynynen M, Tammisto T. A survey of the ASA physical status classification: significant variation in allocation among Finnish anaesthesiologists. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997;41:629-632.
 
8. Haynes SR, Lawler PG. An assessment of the consistency of ASA physical status classification allocation. Anaesthesia 1995;50:195-199.
 
9. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL, Jr. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978;49:239-243.
 
10. Aronson WL, McAuliffe MS, Miller K. Variability in the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification Scale. AANA J 2003;71:265-274.
 
11. Barbeito A, Muir HA, Gan TJ, et al. Use of a modifier reduces inconsistency in the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification in parturients. Anesth Analg 2006;102:1231-1233.
 
12. Copeland GP, Sagar P, Brennan J, et al. Risk-adjusted analysis of surgeon performance: a 1-year study. Br J Surg 1995;82:408-411.