Original Article

Association of Health Insurance with Contraceptive Use and Interpersonal Quality of Contraceptive Care in the Southeast United States

Authors: Kate E. Beatty, PhD, Nathan Hale, PhD, Amal J. Khoury, PhD, Michael G. Smith, DrPH, Jusung Lee, PhD, Liane M. Ventura, MPH

Abstract

Objectives: Health insurance remains an important dimension of contraceptive access. This study investigated the role of insurance in contraceptive use, access, and quality in South Carolina and Alabama.

Methods: The study used a cross-sectional statewide representative survey that assessed reproductive health experiences and contraceptive use among reproductive-age women in South Carolina and Alabama. The primary outcomes were current contraceptive method use, barriers to access (inability to afford wanted method, delay/trouble obtaining wanted method), receipt of any contraceptive care in the past 12 months, and perceived quality of care. The independent variable was insurance type. Generalized linear models were applied to estimate prevalence ratios for each outcome’s association with insurance type while adjusting for potentially confounding variables.

Results: Nearly 1 in 5 women (17.6%) was uninsured, and 1 in 4 women (25.3%) reported not using a contraceptive method at the time of the survey. Compared with women with private insurance, women with no insurance had a lower likelihood of current method use (adjusted prevalence ratio 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.60–0.92) and receipt of contraceptive care in the past 12 months (adjusted prevalence ratio 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.45–0.82). These women also were more likely to experience cost barriers to access care. The insurance type was not significantly associated with the interpersonal quality of contraceptive care.

Conclusions: Findings highlight the need for expanding Medicaid in states that did not do so under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, interventions to increase the number of providers who accept Medicaid patients, and protections to Title X funding as key elements for enhancing contraceptive access and population health outcomes.
Posted in: Family Planning & Reproductive Health14

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Potter JE, Stevenson AJ, Coleman-Minahan K, et al. Challenging unintended pregnancy as an indicator of reproductive autonomy. Contraception 2019; 100:1–4.
 
2. Hale N, Smith M, Baker K, et al. Contraceptive use patterns among women of reproductive age in two southeastern states. Women’s Health Issues 2020; 30:436–445.
 
3. August EM, Steinmetz E, Gavin L, et al. Projecting the unmet need and costs for contraception services after the Affordable Care Act. Am J Public Health 2016;106:334–341.
 
4. Bearak JM, Jones RK. Did contraceptive use patterns change after the Affordable Care Act? A descriptive analysis. Women’s Health Issues 2017; 27:316–321.
 
5. Frederiksen BN, Ahrens K. Understanding the extent of contraceptive non-use among women at risk of unintended pregnancy, National Survey of Family Growth 2011–2017. Contracept X 2020;2:100033.
 
6. Becker D, Tsui AO. Reproductive health service preferences and perceptions of quality among low-income women: racial, ethnic and language group differences. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2008;40:202–211.
 
7. Downing RA, LaVeist TA, Bullock HE. Intersections of ethnicity and social class in provider advice regarding reproductive health. Am J Public Health 2007;97:1803–1807.
 
8. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. % rural in Alabama. County health rankings & roadmaps. https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/explore-health-rankings/alabama?year=2022. Published 2021. Accessed July 27, 2021.
 
9. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. % rural in South Carolina. County health rankings & roadmaps. Published 2021. Accessed July 27, 2021. https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/explore-health-rankings/south-carolina?year=2022.
 
10. Okwori G, Smith MG, Beatty KE, et al. Geographic differences in contraceptive service provision and utilization among federally funded family planning clinics. J Rural Health 2022;38:639–649.
 
11. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. Medically underserved areas in South Carolina. https://scdhec.gov/sites/default/files/docs/Health/docs/SC%20Medically%20Underserved%20Areas%20-%20Map.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed November 30, 2021.
 
12. Alabama Department of Public Health. Medically underserved areas/populations (MUA/Ps). https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/ruralhealth/assets/MUAPMap.pdf. Accessed November 30, 2021.
 
13. Dehlendorf C, Fox E, Silverstein IA, et al. Development of the PersonCentered Contraceptive Counseling scale (PCCC), a short form of the Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning care scale. Contraception 2021;103:310–315.
 
14. Smith MG, Hale N, Kelley S, et al. South Carolina’s Choose Well initiative to reduce unintended pregnancy: rationale, implementation design, and evaluation methodology. Am J Public Health 2022;112:S484–S489.
 
15. Darney B, Biel F, Rodriguez M, et al. Payment for contraceptive services in safety net clinics: roles of ACA, Title X, and state Programs. Medical Care 2020;58:453–460.
 
16. Oglesby WH. Perceptions of and preferences for federally-funded family planning clinics. Reprod Health 2014;11:50.
 
17. Lee H, Hodgkin D, Johnson MP, et al. Medicaid expansion and racial and ethnic disparities in access to health care: applying the National Academy of Medicine definition of health care disparities. Inquiry 2021;58: 0046958021991293.
 
18. Garfield R, Orgera K, Damico A. The coverage gap: uninsured poor adults in states that do not expand Medicaid. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/how-many-uninsured-are-in-the-coverage-gap-and-how-many-could-be-eligible-if-all-states-adopted-the-medicaid-expansion/. Published January 21, 2021. Accessed June 13, 2022.
 
19. Kulczycki A. Dobbs: navigating the new quagmire and its impacts on abortion and reproductive health care. Health Educ Behav 2022;49:924–928.
 
20. The New York Times. Tracking the states where abortion is now banned. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/us/abortion-laws-roe-v-wade.html. Published May 24, 2022. Accessed October 28, 2022.
 
21. Datta PK, Chowdhury SR, Aravindan A, et al. Looking for a silver lining to the dark cloud: a Google trends analysis of contraceptive interest in the United States post Roe vs. Wade verdict. Cureus 2022;14:e27012.
 
22. Hoglash K, Herberlein K. Physician acceptance of new Medicaid patients: what matters and what doesn’t. https://www.macpac.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Physician-Acceptance-of-New-Medicaid-Patients.pdf. Published April 10, 2019. Accessed March 03, 2022.
 
23. Medicaid and CHIP and Access Commission Payment. Advising Congress on Medicaid and CHIP policy. https://www.macpac.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Medicaid-and-Rural-Health.pdf. Published April 2021. Accessed August 19, 2022.
 
24. Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture. State fact sheets: United States. https://data.ers.usda.gov/reports.aspx?ID=17854#P9eae4d3b0fb1469292b32de6a9886959_2_39iT0. Published June 3, 2022. Accessed June 15, 2022.
 
25. Foutz J, Artiga S, Garfield R. The role of Medicaid in rural America. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/the-role-of-medicaid-in-rural-america/. Published April 25, 2017. Accessed June 15, 2022/.
 
26. Moy E. Leading causes of death in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan areas— United States, 1999–2014. MMWR Surveill Summ 2017;66:1–8.
 
27. Pender J, Hertz T, Cromartie J, et al. Rural America at a glance, 2019 edition. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=95340. Published November 2019. Accessed June 15, 2022.
 
28. Sundstrom B, DeMaria AL, Ferrara M, et al. “The closer, the better:” The role of telehealth in increasing contraceptive access among women in rural South Carolina. Matern Child Health J 2019;23:1196–1205.
 
29. Krometis LA, Gohlke J, Kolivras K, et al. Environmental health disparities in the central Appalachian region of the United States. Rev Environ Health 2017;32:253–266.
 
30. Serpico JJ, Ricks JM, Smooth WG, et al. Access to single-visit IUD insertion at obstetrician-gynecology practices in Ohio: an audit study. Contraception 2020;102:190–194.