Original Article
Association of Socioeconomic Variables with Primary Cesarean Section
Abstract
Objectives: Socioeconomic characteristics may be associated with cesarean section (CS) rates. We probe the relationship between socioeconomic variables and primary cesarean section (PCS) by studying indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) in a population-based study in New York City.Methods: This was a retrospective study of all 80,506 women in New York City who gave birth to a live child during 2018, and who met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were drawn from the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and the US Census. The main outcome measure was performance of PCS as compared with vaginal birth.
Results: Approximately 21% of neonates were delivered by PCS. Multivariate multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis showed higher odds for PCS for women with an upper-middle class median household income of US$108,500 to $380,499 (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–1.76, P = 0.001), and the percentage enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001–1.012, P = 0.02). Lower odds for PCS occurred for all middle-class categories of per capita income: US$32,500 to $54,499 (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.99, P = 0.02), US$54,500 to $108,499 (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66–0.88, P < 0.001), and US$108,500 to $380,499 (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66–0.96, P = 0.02). No significant association occurred for women receiving public assistance.
Conclusions: Patient preferences in favor or against CS may be related to SES. There may be conflicts between obstetric care that is maximally beneficial and a patient’s desire for delivery mode. Clinicians should be aware of the potential implications of this dilemma.
Posted in: Obstetrics and Gynecology79
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUP Fast Stats. https://datatools.ahrq.gov/hcup-fast-stats/ (view tab of “national hospitalization utilization & costs” and then tab of “most common operations during inpatient stays.” Accessed August 2, 2023.
2. Osterman MJ. Changes in primary and repeat cesarean delivery: United States, 2016–2021. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsrr/vsrr021.pdf. Published July 2022. Accessed August 2, 2023.
3. Almeida SD, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA, et al. Significant differences in cesarean section rates between a private and a public hospital in Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 2008;24:2909–2918.
4. Singh P, Hashmi G, Swain PK. High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities-analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India. BMC Public Health 2018;18:613.
5. Ushie BA, Udoh EE, Ajayi AI. Examining inequalities in access to delivery by caesarean section in Nigeria. PLoS One 2019;14:e0221778.
6. DeLaTorreA,Nikoloski Z, Mossialos E. Equity of access to maternal health interventions in Brazil and Colombia: a retrospective study. Int J Equity Health 2018;17:43.
7. Miani C, LudwigA, Breckenkamp J, et al. Socioeconomic and migration status as predictors of emergency caesarean section: a birth cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20:32.
8. Joseph KS, Dodds L, Allen AC, et al. Socioeconomic status and receipt of obstetric services in Canada. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:641–650.
9. Adhikari K, McNeil D, McDonald S, et al. Differences in caesarean rates across women’s socio-economic status by diverse obstetric indications: cross-sectional study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2018;32:309–317.
10. Puro N, Kelly RJ, Bodas M, etal. Estimating the differences in Caesarean section (C-section) rates between public and privately insured mothers in Florida: a decomposition approach. PloS One 2022;17:e0266666.
11. Beyerlein A, Lack N, Maier W. Associations of area-level deprivation with adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in Bavaria, Germany: results from a cross-sectional study. PloS One 2020;15:e0236020.
12. Meeker JR, Canelón SP, Bai R, et al. Individual-level and neighborhood-level risk factors for severe maternal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 2021;137:847–854.
13. Barrera C, Kramer M, Merkt P, et al. County-level associations between pregnancy-related mortality ratios and contextual sociospatial indicators, Obstet Gynecol 2022;139:855–865.
14. Hodge MC, Shen M, Xie RH, et al. Neighborhood income and cesarean section rates at a tertiary care center in Canada. Womens Health (Larchmt) 2019;28:1721–1726.
15. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Obstetric care consensus number 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:693–711.
16. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, et al. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Global Health 2021;6:e005671.
17. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Social Determinants of Health database. https://www.ahrq.gov/sdoh/data-analytics/sdoh-data.html. Accessed April 18, 2021.
18. Rose S. Squeezing the middle class: income trajectories from 1967 to 2016. hhttps://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Squeezing-the-middle-class_Report.pdf. Published August 2020. Accessed June 7, 2022.
19. Yunis K, Beydoun H, Khogali M, et al. Low socioeconomic status and neonatal outcomes in an urbanpopulation in a developing country. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003;14:338–343.
20. Ruth CA, Roos N, Hildes-Ripstein E, et al. The influence of gestational age and socioeconomic status on neonatal outcomes in late preterm and early term gestation: a population based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012;12:62.
21. Kim D, Saada A. The social determinants of infant mortality and birth outcomes in western developed nations: a cross-country systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013; 10:2296–2335.
22. Taylor-Robinson D, Lai ETC, Wickham S, et al. Assessing the impact of rising child poverty on the unprecedented rise in infant mortality in England, 2000–2017: time trend analysis. BMJ Open 2019;9:e029424.
23. Patel AB, Bann CM, Kolhe CS, et al. The Global Network Socioeconomic Status Index as a predictor of stillbirths, perinatal mortality, and neonatal mortality in rural communities in low and lower middle income country sites of the Global Network for Women’sandChildren’s Health Research. PloS One 2022;17:e0272712.
24. Bragg F, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study. BMJ 2010;341:c5065.
25. Humphrey MD. Is grand multiparity an independent predictor of pregnancy risk? A retrospective observational study. Med J Australia 2003;179:294–296.
26. Alsammani MA, Jafer AM, Khieri SA, et al. Effect of grand multiparity on pregnancy outcomes in women under 35 years of age: a comparative study. Med Arch 2019; 73:92–96.
27. Passel JS, Cohn D. 20 metro areas are home to six-in-ten unauthorized immigrants. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/03/11/us-metro-areas-unauthorized-immigrants/#:~:text=Most%20of%20the%20United%20States%E2%80%99%2010.7%20million%20unauthorized,Pew%20Research%20Center%20estimates%20based%20on%20government%20data. Published March 11, 2019. Accessed August 2, 2023.
28. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Committee on Obstetric Practice. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. ACOG Committee Opinion#761 https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2019/01/cesarean-delivery-on-maternal-request. Published January 2019. Accessed June 14, 2022.
29. Trahan MJ, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Abenhaim HA. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in the United States from 1999 to 2015. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;226:411.e1–411.e8.
30. Jenabi E, Khazaei S, Bashirian S, et al. Reasons for elective cesarean section on maternal request: a systematic review. Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020;33:3867–3872.
31. Nippita TA, Lee YY, Patterson JA, et al. Variation in hospital cesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study. BJOG 2015; 122:702–711.
32. Brown CC, Adams CE, George KE, et al. Associations between comorbidities and severe maternal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 2020;136:892–901.
33. Fabri RH, Murta EF. Socioeconomic factors and cesarean section rates. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;76:87–88.
34. Hoxha I, Syrogiannouli L, Luta X, et al. Cesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2017;7:e013670.
35. Attanasio LB, Kozhimannil KB, Kjerulff KH. Factors influencing women’s perceptions of shared decision making during labor and delivery: results from a large-scale cohort study of first childbirth. Patient Educ Couns 2018;101:1130–1136.
36. Spigel L, Plough A, Paterson V, et al. Implementation strategies within a complex environment: a qualitative study of a shared decision-making intervention during childbirth. Birth 2022;49:440–454.
37. DeFreitas C, Massag J, Amorim M,et al. Involvement in maternal care by migrants and ethnic minorities: a narrative review. Public Health Rev 2020;41:5.
38. Declercq E, Sakala C, Belanoff C. Women’s experience of agency and respect in maternity care by type of insurance in California. PloS One 2020;15:e0235262.
39. Pew Research Center. Jewish Americans in 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/ 2021/05/11/jewish-americans-in-2020. Published May 11, 2021. Accessed June 20, 2022.
40. Pew Research Center. The changing global religious landscape. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2017/04/05/the-changing-global-religious-landscape/. Published April 5, 2017. Accessed June 20, 2022.
41. Livingston G. Family size among mothers. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2015/05/07/family-size-among-mothers/#:~:text=On%20average%2C%20a%20Hispanic%20mother. Published May 7, 2015. Accessed Jun 20, 2021.
