Original Article
Availability of Specialty Services for Cardiovascular Prevention Practice in the Southeastern United States
Abstract
Objectives: A comprehensive cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention approach should address patients’ medical, behavioral, and psychological issues. The aim of this study was to understand the clinician-reported availability of a pertinent CVD preventive workforce across various specialties using a survey study in the southeastern United States, an area with a disproportionate burden of CVD and commonly known as the Stroke Belt.Methods: We surveyed physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), and pharmacists in internal medicine, family medicine, endocrinology, and cardiology regarding available specialists in CVD preventive practice. We examined categorical variables using the χ2 test and continuous variables using the t test/analysis of variance.
Results: A total of 263 clinicians from 21 health systems participated (27.6% response rate, 91.5% from North Carolina). Most were women (54.5%) and physicians (72.5%) specializing in cardiology (43.6%) and working at academic centers (51.3%). Overall, most clinicians stated having adequate specialist services to manage hypertension (86.6%), diabetes mellitus (90.1%), and dyslipidemia (84%), with >50% stating having adequate specialist services for obesity, smoking cessation, diet/nutrition, and exercise counseling. Many reported working with an APP (69%) or a pharmacist (56.5%). Specialist services for exercise therapy, psychology, behavioral counseling, and preventive cardiology were less available. When examined across the four specialties, the majority reported having adequate specialist services for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, dyslipidemia, and diet/nutrition counseling. Providers from all four specialties were less likely to work with exercise therapists, psychologists, behavioral counselors, and preventive cardiologists.
Conclusions: A majority of providers expressed having adequate specialists for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, obesity, smoking cessation, diet/nutrition, and exercise counseling. Most worked together with APPs and pharmacists but less frequently with exercise therapists, psychologists, behavioral counselors, and preventive cardiologists. Further research should explore approaches to use and expand less commonly available specialists for optimal CVD preventive care.
Posted in: Cardiovascular Disease40 Miscellaneous Cardiovascular Disease (Physical Examination Findings, Murmurs)3
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Underlying cause of death, 1999–2020. https://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/help/ucd.html. Accessed August 18, 2023.
2. Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics2021 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2021;143:e254–e743.
3. Stewart J, Addy K, Campbell S, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: updated review of contemporary guidance and literature. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis 2020;9:2048004020949326.
4. OsborneMT, ShinLM,Mehta NN, et al. Disentangling the links between psychosocial stress and cardiovascular disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imag 2020;13:e010931.
5. US Preventive Services Task Force. Statin use for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2022;328:754–771.
6. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:1376–1414.
7. Handelsman Y, Jellinger PS, Guerin CK, et al. Consensus statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the management of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease algorithm - 2020 executive summary. Endocr Pract 2020;26:1196–1224.
8. Patnode CD, Evans CV, Senger CA, et al. Behavioral counseling to promote a healthful diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults without known cardiovascular disease risk factors: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2017;318:175–193.
9. Das SR, Everett BM, Birtcher KK, et al. 2018 ACC expert consensus decision pathway on novel therapies for cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:3200–3223.
10. Fentanes E, Vande Hei AG, Holuby RS, et al. Treatment in a preventive cardiology clinic utilizing advanced practice providers effectively closes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk-management gaps among a primaryprevention population compared with a propensity-matched primary-care cohort: a team-based care model and its impact on lipid and blood pressure management. Clin Cardiol 2018;41:817–824.
11. Mills KT, Obst KM, Shen W, et al. Comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies for blood pressure control in hypertensive patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2018;168:110–120.
12. Shi X, He J, Lin M, et al. Comparative effectiveness of team-based care with and without a clinical decision support system for diabetes management: a cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2023;176:49–58.
13. Parcha V, Kalra R, Suri SS, et al. Geographic variation in cardiovascular health among American adults. Mayo Clin Proc 2021;96:1770–1781.
14. Flynn A, Vaughan AS, Casper M. Differences in geographic patterns of absolute and relative black-white disparities in stroke mortality in the United States. Prev Chronic Dis 2022;19:E63.
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Heart disease facts: Heart disease in the United States. https://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/facts.htm. Published May 15, 2023. Accessed August 19, 2023.
16. Dallongeville J, Banegas JR, Tubach F, et al. Survey of physicians' practices in the control of cardiovascular risk factors: the EURIKA study. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012;19:541–550.
17. Ju I, Banks E, Calabria B, et al. General practitioners' perspectives on the prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ Open 2018;8:e021137.
18. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999;282:1458–1465.
19. Reiner Z, Sonicki Z, Tedeschi-Reiner E. Physicians' perception, knowledge and awareness of cardiovascular risk factors and adherence to prevention guidelines: the PERCRO-DOC survey. Atherosclerosis 2010;213:598–603.
20. Pokharel Y, Tang F, Jones PG, et al. Adoption of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol management guideline in cardiology practices nationwide. JAMA Cardiol 2017;2:361–369.
21. Pokharel Y, Gosch K, Nambi V, et al. Practice-level variation in statin use among patients with diabetes: insights from the PINNACLE registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:1368–1369.
22. Pokharel Y, Akeroyd JM, Ramsey DJ, et al. Statin use and its facility-level variation in patients with diabetes: insight from the Veterans Affairs National Database. Clin Cardiol 2016;39:185–191.
23. German CA, Shapiro MD. Roadmap to a career in preventive cardiology. Heart 2021;107:1435–1436.
24. Mahmood T, Shapiro MD. The questions on everyone's mind: what is and why do we need preventive cardiology? Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 2021;17:8–14.
25. Shapiro MD, Fazio S. Preventive cardiology as a dedicated clinical service: the past, the present, and the (magnificent) future. Am J Prev Cardiol 2020:1:100011.
26. Shapiro MD, Maron DJ, Morris PB et al. Preventive cardiology as a subspecialty of cardiovascular medicine: JACC Council perspectives. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:1926–1942.
27. Artino AR Jr, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, et al. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Med Teach 2014;36:463–474.
28. Willis GB, Artino AR Jr. What do our respondents think we're asking? Using cognitive interviewing to improve medical education surveys. J Grad Med Educ 2013;5:353–356.
29. Napoles-Springer AM, Santoyo-Olsson J, O'Brien H, et al. Using cognitive interviews to develop surveys in diverse populations. Med Care 2006; 44(11 suppl 3):S21–S30.
30. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95:103208.
31. Consortium for Southeast Healthcare Quality. About us. https://www.cosehq.org/who-we-are/about-us/. Accessed April 24, 2022.
32. Ewen H, Drake T, Ots R. Finalfit: quickly create elegant regression results tables and plots when modelling. R package version. https://finalfit.org/authors.html. Published 2023. Accessed February 20, 2023.
33. Wickham H, Francois R, Henry L, et al. Dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dplyr/index.html. Published 2023. Accessed February 20, 2023.
34. King AC. Exercise counseling in health promotion. West J Med 2000;173:5–6.
35. Pack QR, Keteyian SJ, McBride PE. Subspecialty training in preventive cardiology: the current status and discoverable fellowship programs. Clin Cardiol 2012;35:286–290.
36. Abraham CM, Norful AA, Stone PW, et al. Cost-effectiveness of advanced practice nurses compared to physician-led care for chronic diseases: a systematic review. Nurs Econ 2019;37:293–305.
37. Martin-Misener R, Harbman P, Donald F, et al, Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review. BMJ Open 2015;5:e007167.
38. Jennings C, Astin F. A multidisciplinary approach to prevention. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2017;24(3_suppl):77–87.
39. Health Resources and Services Administration. Allied health workforce projections, 2016-2030: registered dieticians. https://bhw.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/bureau-health-workforce/data-research/registered-dieticians-2016-2030.pdf. Accessed August 19, 2023.
40. de la Torre-Diez I, López-Coronado M, Vaca C, et al. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health 2015;21:81–85.
41. Gass F, Halle M, Mueller S. Telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions: a systematic review. Digit Health 2022;8:20552076221114186.
42. Palmer CS, Brown Levey SM, Kostiuk M, et al. Virtual care for behavioral health conditions. Prim Care 2022;49:641–657.
43. Brunton C, Arensberg MB, Drawert S, et al. Perspectives of registered dietitian nutritionists on adoption of telehealth for nutrition care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare (Basel) 2021;9:235.
44. van den Muijsenbergh M, van Weel C. The essential role of primary care professionals in achieving health for all. Ann Fam Med 2019;17:293–295.
