Original Article

Back to Anatomy: Improving Landmarking Accuracy of Clinical Procedures Using a Novel Approach to Procedural Teaching

Authors: Michelle Zeller, MD, MHPE, Sayra Cristancho,PhD, Joy Mangel, MD, Mark Goldszmidt, MD, MHPE

Abstract

Objectives: Many believe that knowledge of anatomy is essential for performing clinical procedures; however, unlike their surgical counterparts, internal medicine (IM) programs rarely incorporate anatomy review into procedural teaching. This study tested the hypothesis that an educational intervention focused on teaching relevant surface and underlying anatomy would result in improved bone marrow procedure landmarking accuracy.

Methods: This was a preintervention–postintervention prospective study on landmarking accuracy of consenting IM residents attending their mandatory academic half-day. The intervention included an interactive video and visualization exercise; the video was developed specifically to teach the relevant underlying anatomy and includes views of live volunteers, cadavers, and skeletons.

Results: Thirty-one IM residents participated. At pretest, 48% (15/31) of residents landmarked accurately. Inaccuracy of pretest landmarking varied widely (n = 16, mean 20.06 mm; standard deviation 30.03 mm). At posttest, 74% (23/31) of residents accurately performed the procedure. McNemar test revealed a nonsignificant trend toward increased performance at posttest ( P = 0.076; unadjusted odds for discordant pairs 3; 95% confidence interval 0.97–9.3). The Wilcoxon signed rank test demonstrated a significant difference between pre- and posttest accuracy in the 16 residents who were inaccurate at pretest ( P = 0.004). No association was detected between participant baseline characteristics and pretest accuracy.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that residents who were initially inaccurate were able to significantly improve their landmarking skills by interacting with an educational tool emphasizing the relation between the surface and underlying anatomy. Our results support the use of basic anatomy in teaching bone marrow procedures. Results also support the proper use of video as an effective means for incorporating anatomy teaching around procedural skills.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Cottam WW. Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directors. Clin Anat 1999;12:55-65.
 
2. Skoczylas LC, Littleton EB, Kanter SL, et al. Teaching techniques in the operating room: the importance of perceptual motor teaching. Acad Med 2012;87:364-371.
 
3. Older J. Anatomy: a must for teaching the next generation. Surgeon 2004;2:79-90.
 
4. Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach 2013;35:e867-e898.
 
5. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011;306:978-988.
 
6. Gasco J, Holbrook TJ, Patel A, et al. Neurosurgery simulation in residency training: feasibility, cost, and educational benefit. Neurosurgery 2013;73(1 suppl):39-45.
 
7. Oxentenko AS, Ebbert JO, Ward LE, et al. A multidimensional workshop using human cadavers to teach bedside procedures. Teach Learn Med 2003;15:127-130.
 
8. Tabas JA, Rosenson J, Price DD, et al. A comprehensive, unembalmed cadaver-based course in advanced emergency procedures for medical students. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:782-785.
 
9. Aziz MA, McKenzie JC, Wilson JS, et al. The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics. Anat Rec 2002;269:20-32.
 
10. Topping DB. Gross anatomy videos: student satisfaction, usage, and effect on student performance in a condensed curriculum. Anat Sci Educ 2014;7:273-279.
 
11. Lee JC, Boyd R, Stuart P. Randomized controlled trial of an instructional DVD for clinical skills teaching. Emerg Med Australas 2007;19:241-245.
 
12. Cardoso AF, Moreli L, Braga FT, et al. Effect of a video on developing skills in undergraduate nursing students for the management of totally implantable central venous access ports. Nurse Educ Today 2012;32:709-713.
 
13. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D, McIlroy J, et al. Simulation technology: a comparison of experiential and visual learning for undergraduate medical students. Anesthesiology 2002;96:10-16.
 
14. Xeroulis GJ, Park J, Moulton CA, et al. Teaching suturing and knot-tying skills to medical students: a randomized controlled study comparing computer-based video instruction and (concurrent and summary) expert feedback. Surgery 2007;141:442-449.
 
15. Chao TT, Wendel GD Jr, McIntire DD, et al. Effectiveness of an instructional DVD on third- and fourth-degree laceration repair for obstetrics and gynecology postgraduate trainees. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010;109:16-19.
 
16. Van Merrienboer JJG, Kirschner PA. Ten Steps to Complex Learning: A Systematic Approach to Four-Component Instructional Design. New York: Routledge, 2013, ed 2.
 
17. Lenchus J, Issenberg SB, Murphy D, et al. A blended approach to invasive bedside procedural instruction. Med Teach 2011;33:116-123.
 
18. Bishop PW, McNally K, Harris M. Audit of bone marrow trephines. J Clin Pathol 1992;45:1105-1108.
 
19. Birch CD, Fischer S, Zibell A, et al. Diagnostic bone-marrow studies extended routinely by iliac crest biopsy, using the method of Schaadt-Fischer. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand A 1982;90:229-234.
 
20. Rudzki Z, Partyaa T, Okoc K, et al. Adequacy of trephine bone marrow biopsies: the doctor and the patient make a difference. Pol J Pathol 2005;56:187-195.
 
21. Wright C, Rizkalla K. Bone marrow biopsy length and staging of lymphomas. Mod Pathol 1994;7:124A.
 
22. Kilby J, Heneghan NR, Maybury M. Manual palpation of lumbo-pelvic landmarks: a validity study. Man Ther 2012;17:259-262.
 
23. Kim HW, Ko YJ, Rhee WI, et al. Interexaminer reliability and accuracy of posterior superior iliac spine and iliac crest palpation for spinal level estimations. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007;30:386-389.
 
24. O’Haire C, Gibbons P. Inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement for assessing sacroiliac anatomical landmarks using palpation and observation: pilot study. Man Ther 2000;5:13-20.
 
25. Malempati S, Joshi S, Lai S, et al. Videos in clinical medicine. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy. N Engl J Med 2009;361:e28.
 
26. Hall JC. Imagery practice and the development of surgical skills. Am J Surg 2002;184:465-470.
 
27. Cocks M, Moulton CA, Luu S, et al. What surgeons can learn from athletes: mental practice in sports and surgery. J Surg Educ 2014;71:262-269.
 
28. Mayer RE. Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005: 31-48.
 
29. Sanders CW, Sadoski M, van Walsum K, et al. Learning basic surgical skills with mental imagery: using the simulation centre in the mind. Med Educ 2008;42:607-612.
 
30. Saxena V, Natarajan P, O’Sullivan PS, et al. Effect of the use of instructional anatomy videos on student performance. Anat Sci Educ 2008;1:159-165.
 
31. Jaffar AA. YouTube: an emerging tool in anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ 2012;5:158-164.
 
32. Levitan RM, Goldman TS, Bryan DA, et al. Training with video imaging improves the initial intubation success rates of paramedic trainees in an operating room setting. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:46-50.
 
33. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, et al. Accuracy of physician selfassessment compared with observed measures of competence. JAMA 2006;296:33094-1102.
 
34. Regehr G, Eva K. Self-assessment, self-direction, and the self-regulating professional. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;449:34-38.
 
35. Eva KW, Regehr G. Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med 2005;80(10 suppl):S46-S54.
 
36. Dolmans DH, De Grave W, Wolfhagen IH, et al. Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research. Med Educ 2005;39:732-741.
 
37. Dent JA, Harden RM. A Practical Guide for Medical Teachers. Elsevier Limited: Edinburgh, 2009, ed 3.
 
38. Byrne AJ, Pugsley L, Hashem MA. Review of comparative studies of clinical skills training. Med Teach 2008;30:764-767.