Original Article

Breast and Cervical Cancer Mortality in the Mississippi Delta, 1979–1998

Authors: H. Irene Hall, PHD, Patricia M. Jamison, MPH, Steven S. Coughlin, PHD

Abstract

Background: Historically, the Mississippi Delta region has been medically underserved. This may lead to lower cancer prevention efforts and higher breast or cervical cancer mortality rates.


Methods: Death rates for 1979 through 1998 were calculated for Mississippi Delta women and for women living elsewhere in the US.


Results: Breast cancer mortality in the Delta was similar to that elsewhere in the US in recent years for both black and white women, but rates were lower in the Delta in the early years of the study period. Overall, cervical cancer mortality was similar in the two areas but rates declined more rapidly elsewhere in the US than in the Delta. Breast and cervical cancer mortality was higher among black women than among white women in both areas. Cervical cancer mortality was higher among white rural and black urban women in the Delta than their counterparts elsewhere.


Conclusion: These results can guide prevention activities for reducing mortality from these diseases.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. US Department of Transportation. Delta Vision, Delta Voices: The Mississippi Delta Beyond 2000. Washington, DC, US Department of Transportation. Available at: http://ntl.bts.gov/data/DeltaVision-Voices.PDF. Accessed October 28, 2003.
 
2. Chen VW, Groves FD, Fontham ET, et al. Cancer in south Louisiana: Part III—Cancers of the breast and the reproductive system. J La State Med Soc 1992; 144: 171–177.
 
3. Chen VW, Wu XC, Andrews PA, et al. Highlights of cancer incidence in Louisiana, 1988–1992. J La State Med Soc 1997; 149: 119–124.
 
4. Chen VW, Andrews PA, Wu XC, et al. Cancer incidence in the industrial corridor: An update. J La State Med Soc 1998; 150: 158–167.
 
5. Groves FD, Andrews PA, Chen VW, et al. Is there a “cancer corridor” in Louisiana? J La State Med Soc 1996; 148: 155–165.
 
6. Carreno OJ, Field RJ III, Field RJ Jr. A ten year retrospective study of breast cancer in a rural Mississippi setting. J Miss State Med Assoc 1994; 35: 255–258.
 
7. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. Washington, DC, US Department of Health and Human Services, January 2000, 2 vols. Available at:http://www.healthypeople.gov/document/. Accessed October 28, 2003.
 
8. Potosky AL, Breen N, Graubard BI, et al. The association between health care coverage and the use of cancer screening tests: Results from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey. Med Care 1998; 36: 257–270.
 
9. Risser DR, Condon KW. Stage of cancer diagnosis in rural versus urban areas of Texas: implications for changing the disparity through health services. Tex J Rural Health 1995; 14: 20–27.
 
10. Brown ML, Fintor L. Accreditation of mammography facilities by the American College of Radiology: Results of a national survey. Am J Prev Med 1994; 10: 162–167.
 
11. Henry JA, Wadehra V. Influence of smear quality on the rate of detecting significant cervical cytologic abnormalities. Acta Cytol 1996; 40: 529–535.
 
12. Chen VW, Wu XC, Andrews PA, et al. Advanced stage at diagnosis: An explanation for higher than expected cancer death rates in Louisiana? J La State Med Soc 1994; 146: 137–145.
 
13. Monroe AC, Ricketts TC, Savitz LA. Cancer in rural versus urban populations: A review. J Rural Health 1992; 8: 212–220.
 
14. National Vital Statistics System, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mortality data, multiple cause-of-death, 1972–1998 (machine-readable public-use data tapes). Hyattsville, MD, US Department of Health and Human Services, US Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999.
 
15. World Health Organization. Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death, Based on the Recommendations of the Ninth Revision Conference, 1975. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1977.
 
16. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER), National Cancer Institute. US Populations, Individual State Populations: County Level. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/popdata/download.html. Accessed October 28, 2003.
 
17. Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, et al. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med 2000; 19: 335–351.
 
18. Ries LAG, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, et al (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1994 (NIH Publication No. 97-2789). Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute, 1997. Available at:http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1973_1994/. Accessed October 28, 2003.
 
19. Appalachian Regional Commission. Distressed Counties Program. Washington, DC, Appalachian Regional Commission. Available at: http://www.arc.gov/index.do?nodeId=18. Accessed October 28, 2003.
 
20. Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture. Measuring Rurality: Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/rurality/RuralUrbCon/. Accessed October 28, 2003.
 
21. Kelsey JL, Gammon MD, John EM. Reproductive factors and breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev 1993; 15: 36–47.
 
22. Chen VW, Craig JF, Fontham ET, et al. Excessive cancer rates among blacks in Louisiana: An opportunity for physician intervention. J La State Med Soc 1990; 142: 18–26.
 
23. Higginbotham JC, Moulder J, Currier M. Rural v. urban aspects of cancer: First-year data from the Mississippi Central Cancer Registry. Fam Community Health 2001; 24: 1–9.
 
24. Anderson LM, May DS. Has the use of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening increased in the United States? Am J Public Health 1995; 85: 840–842.
 
25. Blackman DK, Bennett EM, Miller DS. Trends in self-reported use of mammograms (1989–1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991–1997): Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 1999; 48( 6): 1–22.
 
26. The National Cancer Institute Cancer Screening Consortium for Underserved Women. Breast and cervical cancer screening among underserved women: Baseline survey results from six states. Arch Fam Med 1995; 4: 617–624.
 
27. Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Hall HI, et al. Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998–1999. Cancer 2002; 94: 2801–2812.
 
28. Casey MM, Thiede Call K, Klingner JM. Are rural residents less likely to obtain recommended preventive healthcare services? Am J Prev Med 2001; 21: 182–188.
 
29. Ramsbottom-Lucier M, Emmett K, Rich EC, et al. Hills, ridges, mountains, and roads: Geographical factors and access to care in rural Kentucky. J Rural Health 1996; 12: 386–394.
 
30. Zhang P, Tao G, Irwin KL. Utilization of preventive medical services in the United States: A comparison between rural and urban populations. J Rural Health 2000; 16: 349–356.
 
31. Fein O. The influence of social class on health status: American and British research on health inequalities. J Gen Intern Med 1995; 10: 577–586.
 
32. Hahn RA, Eaker E, Barker ND, et al. Poverty and death in the United States: 1973 and 1991. Epidemiology 1995; 6: 490–497.
 
33. Freeman H. Race, poverty, and cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991; 83: 526–527(editorial).
 
34. Pamies RJ, Woodard LJ. Cancer in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Prim Care 1992; 19: 443–450.
 
35. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. State Health Facts Online. Available at:http://www.statehealthfacts.kff.org/. Accessed October 28, 2003.
 
36. Strickland J, Strickland DL. Barriers to preventive health services for minority households in the rural south. J Rural Health 1996; 12: 206–217.
 
37. Friedell GH, Rubio A, Maretzki A, et al. Community cancer control in a rural, underserved population: The Appalachian Leadership Initiative on Cancer Project. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2001; 12: 5–19.
 
38. Earp JA, Altpeter M, Mayne L, et al. The North Carolina Breast Cancer Screening Program: Foundations and design of a model for reaching older, minority, rural women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1995; 35: 7–22.
 
39. Scroggins TG Jr, Bartley TK. Enhancing cancer control: Assessing cancer knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs in disadvantaged communities. J La State Med Soc 1999; 151: 202–208.
 
40. Walker R, Lucas W, Crespo R. The West Virginia Rural Cancer Prevention project. Cancer Pract 1994; 2: 421–426.
 
41. Gittelsohn A, Senning J. Studies on the reliability of vital and health records: Part I—Comparison of cause of death and hospital record diagnoses. Am J Public Health 1979; 69: 680–689.
 
42. Percy C, Stanek E III, Gloeckler L. Accuracy of cancer death certificates and its effect on cancer mortality statistics. Am J Public Health 1981; 71: 242–250.
 
43. Division of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Online Prevalence Data, 1995–2002. Available at: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss/. Accessed October 28, 2003.