Original Article

Breast Cancer Incidence and Exposure to Environmental Chemicals in 82 Counties in Mississippi

Authors: Amal K. Mitra, MD, MPH, DRPH, Fazlay S. Faruque, PHD, PG

Abstract

Objective: Breast cancer is a major public health problem in the United States and in most industrialized countries. Environmental exposure to several chemicals has been implicated in the cause of breast cancer. However, data are not consistent about the role of the environment in breast cancer incidence. To assess environmental risks for breast cancer, patterns of breast cancer incidence in relation to environmental chemicals in Mississippi counties were mapped.


Methods: This article presents an analysis of age-adjusted incidence rates of female breast cancer and environmental chemical emissions by county in the state of Mississippi. The incidence data were obtained from the State Department of Health, and emissions data sources included the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s AirData and Toxics Release Inventory Program.


Results: Counties having a significantly higher incidence of breast cancer compared with the state’s rate were identified. Also identified were counties with higher levels of chemical emissions. The incidence of breast cancer in 1998 was significantly associated with the amount of ammonia (r = 0.268, P = 0.015), minimum emissions (r = 0.233, P = 0.035), and maximum emissions (r = 0.237, P = 0.032) of the facilities in the county. A linear dose-response relationship was observed between increased amounts of chemical emissions and breast cancerincidence.


Conclusions: This study found a significant link between breast cancer incidence and maximum emissions of environmental chemicals. However, further research using individual-level data is needed.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. National Cancer Institute. Cancer facts: Lifetime probability of breast cancer in American women. Available at: http://www.nci.nih.gov/fact/5_6.htm. Accessed January 14, 2004.
 
2. Li CI, Anderson BO, Daling JR, Moe RE. Trends in incidence rates of invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma. JAMA 2003; 289: 1421–1424.
 
3. Hulka BS, Moorman PG. Breast cancer: Hormones and other risk factors. Maturitas 2001; 38: 103–116.
 
4. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2001–2002. Available at:http://www.cancer.org/docroot/STT/content/STT_1x_Breast_Cancer_Facts_and_Figures_2001-2002.asp. Accessed September 24, 2003.
 
5. Mitra AK, Faruque FS, Avis AL. Breast cancer and environmental risks. J Environ Health In press.
 
6. Hoffman W. Organochlorine compounds: Risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and breast cancer? Arch Environ Health 1996; 51: 189–192.
 
7. Demers A, Ayotte P, Brisson J, et al. Plasma concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls and the risk of breast cancer: A congener-specific analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 155: 629–635.
 
8. Soto J, Quindos LS, Cos S, et al. Influence of low doses of radiation due to 222Rn on proliferation of fibroblasts and MCF-7 human breast cancer cells in vitro. Sci Total Environ 1996; 181: 181–185.
 
9. Stebbings JH. Health risks from radium in workplaces: An unfinished story. Occup Med 2001; 16: 259–270.
 
10. Verkasalo PK, Pukkala E, Kaprio J, et al. Magnetic fields of high voltage power lines and risk of cancer in Finnish adults: Nationwide cohort study. BMJ 1996; 313: 1047–1051.
 
11. Laitman CJ. DES exposure and the aging woman: Mothers and daughters. Curr Womens Health Rep 2002; 2: 390–393.
 
12. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al; Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: Principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 321–333.
 
13. Terry PD, Rohan TE. Cigarette smoking and the risk of breast cancer in women: A review of the literature. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002; 11: 953–971.
 
14. Terry PD, Miller AB, Rohan TE. Cigarette smoking and breast cancer risk: A long latency period? Int J Cancer 2002; 100: 723–728.
 
15. Kropp S, Chang-Claude J. Active and passive smoking and risk of breast cancer by age 50 years among German women. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156: 616–626.
 
16. Stellman SD, Djordjevic MV, Britton JA, et al. Breast cancer risk in relation to adipose concentrations of organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in Long Island, New York. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000; 9: 1241–1249.
 
17. van ’t Veer P, Lobbezoo IE, Martin-Moreno JM, et al. DDT (dicophane) and postmenopausal breast cancer in Europe: Case-control study. BMJ 1997; 315: 81–85.
 
18. Zheng T, Holford TR, Mayne ST, et al. β-benzene hexachloride in breast adipose tissue and risk of breast carcinoma. Cancer 1999; 85: 2212–2218.
 
19. Zheng T, Holford TR, Mayne ST, et al. Risk of female breast cancer associated with serum polychlorinated biphenyls and 1,1-dichloro-2,2′-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000; 9: 167–174.
 
20. Abdalla MH, Gutierrez-Mohamed ML, Farah IO. Association of pesticide exposure and risk of breast cancer mortality in Mississippi. Biomed Sci Instrum 2003; 39: 397–401.
 
21. Lewis-Michl EL, Melius JM, Kallenbach LR, et al. Breast cancer risk and residence near industry or traffic in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, Long Island, New York. Arch Environ Health 1996; 51: 255–265.
 
22. Goldberg MS, al-Homsi N, Goulet L, et al. Incidence of cancer among persons living near a municipal solid waste landfill site in Montreal, Quebec. Arch Environ Health 1995; 50: 416–424.