Invited Commentary
Commentary on “Evaluation of a Points-Based Scholarly Activity Policy in Internal Medicine”
Abstract
The importance of research training in internal medicine residency programs has long been recognized. In 1994, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) implemented a scholarly activity requirement.1 Since that time, residency programs have worked to find a formula for success in resident research training. To accomplish this, programs have dedicated curricula and funding to research practices, promoted mentorship, provided time, and offered incentives. Although many of these practices increase publication rates, was this what the ACGME envisioned when creating its mandate? Are we actually producing research-literate physicians?This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.