Primary Article

Comparison of the Mini‐cone Biopsy With the Punch Biopsy and Papanicolaou Smear

Authors: ELI M. NADEL MD, HERBERT B. TAYLOR MD

Abstract

Diagnostic cervical cytologic and histopathologic study of 81 patients was done by the Papanicolaou smear, punch biopsy, and mini-cone biopsy methods. After initial experience with the mini-cone instrument, sufficient circumferentially coned tissue for histopathologic study was regularly obtained. The mini-cone procedure using the disposable plastic device provided information equal to that of the punch biopsy in 76 of the 81 cases, which were approximately equally divided into class 1–2 smears (negative) and class 3–4 smears (dysplasia). Only the mini-cone biopsy revealed unexpected Manilia (one case) and “contraceptive” hyperplasia (three cases). No bleeding problem was encountered. The mini-cone information obtained was at least equal to that obtained by punch biopsy, a procedure often used to supplement Pap smear findings. If these preliminary results are supported in a carefully structured protocol led study, consideration could be given to using the mini-cone biopsy method when the Pap smear needs to be repeated.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References