Original Article
Comprehension of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence in Southern Appalachian Women
Abstract
Objectives: Despite their growing prevalence, pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) remain undertreated and not well understood by patients, with treatment disparities noted in specific subgroups of women. The goal of the present study was to determine the basic understanding of PFDs of women in the southern Appalachian region of the United States, to determine factors that predict knowledge, and to explore the possible disparities in seeking access to care among women in this region who reported symptoms.Methods: A survey of patient knowledge of PFDs, specifically urinary incontinence (UI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP), was conducted in Johnson City, Tennessee, and involved 305 female patients from this city and the surrounding region.
Results: Almost half of the participants (43%) reported UI symptoms, with only 25% of these participants reporting treatment. A much smaller percentage (5%) reported POP symptoms, but 44% reported receiving treatment. Overall proficiency for UI knowledge was 54.4%, and 69.5% for POP knowledge. Higher UI knowledge was predicted (P < 0.05) by age younger than 60 years, annual income >$50,000, more than a high school education, and being married. UI knowledge was unrelated to the presence of UI symptoms, receipt of UI treatment, or having seen a urospecialist. Higher POP knowledge was predicted (P < 0.05) by annual income >$50,000, more than a high school education, and presence of POP symptoms. The only factor significantly predicting seeking treatment among women with UI symptoms was marital status.
Conclusions: Overall knowledge of both UI and POP was reasonably high in this population, suggesting appropriate self-education or education by providers in the region. The women most affected by UI, particularly those older than 60 years, were not well informed, and education by providers does not appear to specifically target women seeking treatment. We must continue to educate and further reduce the gap of knowledge and treatment regarding PFDs in southern Appalachia.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Basu M, Duckett JR. Barriers to seeking treatment for women with persistent or recurrent symptoms in urogynaecology. BJOG 2009;116:726-730.
2. Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:141-148.
3. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 2008;300:1311-1316.
4. Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, et al. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1278-1283.
5. Holst K, Wilson PD. The prevalence of female urinary incontinence and reasons for not seeking treatment. N Z Med J 1988;101:756-758.
6. Morrill M, Lukacz ES, Lawrence JM, et al. Seeking healthcare for pelvic floor disorders: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:86.e1-e6.
7. Minassian VA, Yan X, Lichtenfeld MJ, et al. Predictors of care seeking in women with urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2012;31:470-474.
8. Kinchen KS, Burgio K, Diokno AC, et al. Factors associated with women’ decisions to seek treatment for urinary incontinence. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2003;12:687-698.
9. Willis-Gray MG, Sandoval JS, Maynor J, et al. Barriers to urinary incontinence care seeking in white, black, and Latina women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2015;21:83-86.
10. Berger MB, Patel DA, Miller JM, et al. Racial differences in self-reported healthcare seeking and treatment for urinary incontinence in community-dwelling women from the EPI Study. Neurourol Urodyn 2011;30:1442-1447.
11. Appalachian Regional Commission. Research, maps, and data. https://www.arc.gov/research/RegionalDataandResearch.asp. Accessed October 16, 2017.
12. Shah AD, Massagli MP, Kohli N, et al. A reliable, valid instrument to assess patient knowledge about urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008;19:1283-1289.
13. Mandimika CL, Murk W, Müä McPencow A, et al. Knowledge of pelvic floor disorders in a population of community-dwelling women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:165.e1-e9.
14. Mandimika CL, Murk W, Mcpencow AM, et al. Racial disparities in knowledge of pelvic floor disorders among community-dwelling women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2015;21:287-292.
15. Shah AD, Shott S, Kohli N, et al. Do racial differences in knowledge about urogynecologic issues exist? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008;19:1371-1378.
16. US Census Bureau. QuickFacts: Washington county. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/washingtoncounty. Accessed October 16, 2017.
17. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, et al. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trø. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53: 1150-1157.
18. Wilson L, Brown JS, Shin GP, et al. Annual direct cost of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:398-406.
19. US Census Bureau. An aging nation: the older population in the United States: 2012. Population estimates and projections. Current population reports. https://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1140.pdf. Accessed October 18, 2016.
20. Vermeulen KM, Visser E, Messelink EJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a pro-active approach of urinary incontinence in women. BJOG 2016;123: 1213-1220.
