Original Article
Differences in Medical Students’ Academic Performance between a Pass/Fail and Tiered Grading System
Abstract
Objectives: Medical school implementation of a pass/fail grading system offers the opportunity for a reduction in student stress and anxiety and the creation of a less competitive environment, leading to an improvement in overall well-being. Some critics of a pass/fail system have raised concerns of a decrement in academic performance. The purpose of this research project was to determine whether medical students at the Medical College of Georgia experienced a significant change in academic performance when graded using a pass/fail grading system rather than a tiered grading system in the year 1 curriculum.Methods: This retrospective cohort study included a convenience sample of two cohorts of students: the first had tiered grading in the first year of medical school (classes of 2015 and 2016; n = 389) and the second cohort had pass/fail grading in the first year of medical school (classes of 2017 and 2018; n=385). Students’ undergraduate grade point average and Medical College Admission Test scores in the two cohorts were compared. The first- and second-year averages and comprehensive finals, and the US Medical Licensing Examination step 1 scores were compared. Mann-Whitney U tests were calculated to compare the cohorts’ grades.
Results: Overall, both cohorts performed similarly in the first and second year of medical school and on US Medical Licensing Examination step 1; however, there were a few unimportant but statistically significant differences of 1 to 2 points on a 100-point scale. In a few instances, the pass/fail cohort performed slightly better and in others, slightly worse.
Conclusions: Overall academic performance was similar. The potential for an enhanced learning environment associated with pass/fail grading does not create an important decrement in academic performance.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
Existing members, please login first
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Purchase only this article ($25)
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)
Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.
References
1. Eva EO, Islam MZ, Mosaddek AS, et al. Prevalence of stress among medical students: a comparative study between public and private medical schools in Bangladesh. BMC Res Notes 2015;8:327.
2. Moffat KJ, McConnachie A, Ross S, et al. First year medical student stress and coping in a problem-based learning medical curriculum. Med Educ 2004;38:482-491.
3. Radcliffe C, Lester H. Perceived stress during undergraduate medical training: a qualitative study. Med Educ 2003;37:32-38.
4. Zvauya R, Oyebode F, Day EJ, et al. A comparison of stress levels, coping styles and psychological morbidity between graduate-entry and traditional undergraduate medical students during the first 2 years at a UK medical school. BMC Res Notes 2017;10:93.
5. Association of American Medical Colleges. Number of medical schools using selected grading systems in pre-clerkship courses (excluding physical diagnosis/clinical skills). https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/cir/406418/11.html. Accessed January 21, 2017.
6. Spring L, Robillard D, Gehlbach L, et al. Impact of pass/fail grading on medical students’ well-being and academic outcomes. Med Educ 2011;45:867-877.
7. Gjersvik P. The end of pass/fail grades? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2013;133:1549.
8. Short JG, Bloodgood RA. The impact of pass/fail grading. Acad Med 2009;84:1470.
9. Wilkinson T. A change to pass/fail grading. Acad Med 2009;84:1643.
10. Wilkinson T. Pass/fail grading: not everything that counts can be counted. Med Educ 2011;45:860-862.
11. Bloodgood RA, Short JG, Jackson JM, et al. A change to pass/fail grading in the first two years at one medical school results in improved psychological well-being. Acad Med 2009;84:655-662.
12. Jacobs JL, Samarasekera DD, Shen L, et al. Encouraging an environment to nurture lifelong learning: an Asian experience. Med Teach 2014;36: 164-168.
13. Rohe DE, Barrier PA, Clark MM, et al. The benefits of pass-fail grading on stress, mood, and group cohesion in medical students. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81:1443-1448.
14. Reed DA, Shanafelt TD, Satele DW, et al. Relationship of pass/fail grading and curriculum structure with well-being among preclinical medical students: a multi-institutional study. Acad Med 2011;86:1367-1373.
15. White CB, Fantone JC. Pass-fail grading: laying the foundation for self-regulated learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2010;15: 469-477.
16. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 2000;55:68-78.
17. McDuff SG, McDuff D, Farace JA, et al. Evaluating a grading change at UCSD School of Medicine: pass/fail grading is associated with decreased performance on preclinical exams but unchanged performance on USMLE step 1 scores. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:127.
18. Pepple DJ. Comparison of outcome of students’ performance using the standard setting method with the absolute grading method in preclinical examination. Niger J Physiol Sci 2014;29:103-106.
19. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
20. Ali M, Asim H, Edhi AL, et al. Does academic assessment type affect levels of academic stress in medical students? A cross-sectional study from Pakistan. Med Educ Online 2015;20:27706.
21. Gonnella JS, Erdmann JB, Hojat M. An empirical study of the predictive validity of number grades in medical school using 3 decades of longitudinal data: implications for a grading system. Med Educ 2004;38: 425-434.
