Abstract
Abstract:Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a sophisticated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique with rapid acquisition time and high sensitivity for depicting acute cerebral ischemia. It is currently part of the routine workup in most medical centers when ischemic stroke is in the differential diagnosis. DWI helps establish a diagnosis of acute ischemic infarct even in cases where the clinical presentation is not typical for ischemic stroke. However, contrary to popular belief, not every hyperintensity on DWI is an ischemic stroke. Consequently, DWI with high intensity signals, commonly called “positive” DWI, is sometimes misinterpreted and leads to incorrect medical management. In this report, we briefly discuss some of the essential, technical aspects of DWI and report various clinical scenarios, which may lead to “positive” DWI findings but are not ischemic strokes. Although the sensitivity of DWI for ischemic stroke is very high, the specificity is not as high, and a “positive” DWI does not exclude other diagnoses that should be considered based on each patient’s clinical history and examination, and the appearance of other sequences of MRI scans.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
References
References1.Bykowski J, Schellinger PD, Warach S. Diffusion and Perfusion MRI, in Edelman RR, Hesselink JR, Zlatkin MB, et al (eds): Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Philadelphia, Saunders-Elsevier, 2006, ed 3, pp 1538–1570.2.Schaefer PW, Ozsunar Y, He J, et al. Assessing tissue viability with MR diffusion and perfusion imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:436–443.SchaeferPW]]OzsunarY]]HeJ&etal;Assessing tissue viability with MR diffusion and perfusion imaging.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol200324436-4433.Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986;161:401–407.Le BihanD]]BretonE]]LallemandD&etal;MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders.Radiology1986161401-4074.Lutsep HL, Albers GW, DeCrespigny A, et al. Clinical utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol 1997;41:574–580.LutsepHL]]AlbersGW]]DeCrespignyA&etal;Clinical utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of ischemic stroke.Ann Neurol199741574-5805.Sylaja PN, Coutts SB, Krol A, et al. When to expect negative diffusion-weighted images in stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke 2008;39:1898–1900.SylajaPN]]CouttsSB]]KrolA&etal;When to expect negative diffusion-weighted images in stroke and transient ischemic attack.Stroke2008391898-19006.Culebras A, Kase CS, Masdeu JC, et al. Practice guidelines for the use of imaging in transient ischemic attacks and acute stroke. A report of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 1997;28:1480–1497.CulebrasA]]KaseCS]]MasdeuJC&etal;Practice guidelines for the use of imaging in transient ischemic attacks and acute stroke. A report of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association.Stroke1997281480-14977.Hartmann M, Jansen O, Heiland S, et al. Restricted diffusion within ring enhancement is not pathognomonic for brain abscess. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1738–1742.HartmannM]]JansenO]]HeilandS&etal;Restricted diffusion within ring enhancement is not pathognomonic for brain abscess.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2001221738-17428.Fischbein NJ, Roberts TP, Dillon WP. Bleed or stroke? Diffusion measurements in intracranial hematomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1179–1180.FischbeinNJ]]RobertsTP]]DillonWPBleed or stroke? Diffusion measurements in intracranial hematomas.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2000211179-11809.Baehring JM, Bi WL, Bannykh S, et al. Diffusion MRI in the early diagnosis of malignant glioma. J Neurooncol 2007;82:221–225.BaehringJM]]BiWL]]BannykhS&etal;Diffusion MRI in the early diagnosis of malignant glioma.J Neurooncol200782221-22510.Rovaris M, Gass A, Bammer R, et al. Diffusion MRI in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2005;65:1526–1532.RovarisM]]GassA]]BammerR&etal;Diffusion MRI in multiple sclerosis.Neurology2005651526-153211.Filippi M, Inglese M. Overview of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance studies in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2001;186(suppl 1):S37–S43.FilippiM]]IngleseMOverview of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance studies in multiple sclerosis.J Neurol Sci2001186S37-S4312.Lansberg MG, O’Brien MW, Norbash AM, et al. MRI abnormalities associated with partial status epilepticus. Neurology 1999;52:1021–1027.LansbergMG]]O’BrienMW]]NorbashAM&etal;MRI abnormalities associated with partial status epilepticus.Neurology1999521021-102713.Mathews MS, Smith WS, Wintermark M, et al. Local cortical hypoperfusion imaged with CT perfusion during postictal Todd’s paresis. Neuroradiology 2008;50:397–401.MathewsMS]]SmithWS]]WintermarkM&etal;Local cortical hypoperfusion imaged with CT perfusion during postictal Todd’s paresis.Neuroradiology200850397-40114.Hong KS, Cho YJ, Lee SJ, et al. Diffusion changes suggesting predominant vasogenic oedema during partial status epilepticus. Seizure 2004;13:317–321.HongKS]]ChoYJ]]LeeSJ&etal;Diffusion changes suggesting predominant vasogenic oedema during partial status epilepticus.Seizure200413317-321
