Abstract
Background The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital imaging in the diagnosis of toddler's fractures. Methods Medical records for a 9.4-year period were reviewed to locate children whose initial radiographs were interpreted as normal by a pediatric radiologist and whose subsequent bone scans or follow-up radiographs showed toddler's fractures. Radiographs from these children (ie, positive controls) and from children without toddler's fractures (ie, negative controls) were digitized to create a film bank that was reviewed by a panel of 14 physicians with various medical backgrounds. Medical records were reviewed for demographic information, findings on history and physical examination, and radiographic and laboratory tests. Results Pediatric radiology physicians correctly diagnosed 73.2 ± 5.4% of the digitized images, as compared with pediatric emergency physicians, 66.7 ± 6.5% and residents/fellows, 57.1 ± 6.9%. Conclusion Digitized images may be helpful in evaluating limping children with suspected toddler's fractures, possibly eliminating the need for further diagnostic studies.
This content is limited to qualifying members.
If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.
Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.
Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.
References
References 1. Balter S. Fundamental properties of digital images. Radiographics 1993; 13: 129–141.BalterSFundamental properties of digital imagesRadiographics199313129 2. Wegryn SA, Piraino DW, Richmond BJ, Schluchter MD, Uetani M, Freed HA, et al. Comparison of digital and conventional musculoskeletal radiography: An observer performance study. Radiology 1990; 175: 225–228.WegrynSA]]PirainoDW]]RichmondBJ]]SchluchterMD]]UetaniM]]FreedHAComparison of digital and conventional musculoskeletal radiography: An observer performance studyRadiology1990175225 3. Wilson AJ, Hodge JC. Digitized radiographs in skeletal trauma: A performance comparison between a digital workstation and the original film images. Radiology 1995; 196: 565–568.WilsonAJ]]HodgeJCDigitized radiographs in skeletal trauma: A performance comparison between a digital workstation and the original film imagesRadiology1995196565 4. Scott WW Jr, Rosenbaum JE, Ackerman SJ, Reichle RL, Magid D, Weller JC, et al. Subtle orthopedic fractures: Teleradiology workstation versus film interpretation. Radiology 1993; 187: 811–815.ScottWW]]RosenbaumJE]]AckermanSJ]]ReichleRL]]MagidD]]WellerJCSubtle orthopedic fractures: Teleradiology workstation versus film interpretationRadiology1993187811 5. Dunbar JS, Owen HF, Nogrady MB, McLeese R. Obscure tibial fracture of infants: The toddler's fracture. J Can Assoc Radiol 1964; 15: 136–144.DunbarJS]]OwenHF]]NogradyMB]]McLeeseRObscure tibial fracture of infants: The toddler's fractureJ Can Assoc Radiol196415136 6. Tschoepe EJ, John SD, Swischuk LE. Tibial fractures in infants and children: Emphasis on subtle injuries. Emerg Radiol 1998; 5: 245–252.TschoepeEJ]]JohnSD]]SwischukLETibial fractures in infants and children: Emphasis on subtle injuriesEmerg Radiol19985245 7. Tenenbein M, Reed MH, Black GB. The toddler's fracture revisited. Am J Emerg Med 1990; 8: 208–211.TenenbeinM]]ReedMH]]BlackGBThe toddler's fracture revisitedAm J Emerg Med19908208 8. John SD, Moorthy CS, Swischuk LE. Expanding the concept of toddler's fracture. Radiographics 1997; 17: 367–376.JohnSD]]MoorthyCS]]SwischukLEExpanding the concept of toddler's fractureRadiographics199717367 9. Oudjhane K, Newman B, Oh KS, Young LW, Girdany BR. Occult fractures in preschool children. J Trauma 1988; 28: 858–860.OudjhaneK]]NewmanB]]OhKS]]YoungLW]]GirdanyBROccult fractures in preschool childrenJ Trauma198828858 10. Youmans DC, Don S, Hildebolt C, Shackelford GD, Luker GD, McAlister WH. Skeletal surveys for child abuse: Comparison of interpretation using digitized images and screen-film radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 1415–1419.YoumansDC]]DonS]]HildeboltC]]ShackelfordGD]]LukerGD]]McAlisterWHSkeletal surveys for child abuse: Comparison of interpretation using digitized images and screen-film radiographsAJR Am J Roentgenol19981711415 11. Murphey MD, Bramble JM, Cook LT, Martin NL, Dwyer SJ III. Nondisplaced fractures: Spatial resolution requirements for detection with digital skeletal imaging. Radiology 1990; 174: 865–870.MurpheyMD]]BrambleJM]]CookLT]]MartinNL]]DwyerSJ IIINondisplaced fractures: Spatial resolution requirements for detection with digital skeletal imagingRadiology1990174865 12. Cox GG, Cook LT, McMillan JH, Rosenthal SJ, Dwyer SJIII. Chest radiography: Comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film. Radiology 1990; 176: 771–776.CoxGG]]CookLT]]McMillanJH]]RosenthalSJ]]DwyerSJChest radiography: Comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital filmRadiology1990176771 &NA; FIGURE Figure. Publication of original works of art coordinated by the American Physicians Art Association. Artwork graciously supplied through the courtesy of APAA members. Alps in Winter, Near Innsbruck, Austria Barbara Josephine Basta, MD Williamsburg, VA
