Original Article

Drip System for Admissions to Resident Teams: Impact on Workload and Education

Authors: Stephanie Berger, MD, Lauren B. Nassetta, MD, Meghan E. Hofto, MD, MPH, Paul Scalici, MD, Robert F. Pass, MD

Abstract

Objectives: Assigning patients to a call team every fourth day (bolus system) caused the maldistribution of patients among resident teams and required additional faculty effort for overflow patient care. We changed to a continuous daily rotation (drip system) and examined the effect on clinical workload among resident teams, resident education, and faculty utilization.

Methods: This is a retrospective study based on the daily records of 7 am team census, the attending physician schedules for a pediatric hospital medicine service with 5 teams, and the measures of resident education, including noon conference attendance, scores on in-service examinations, and duty hour violations. Data from the bolus system (May 2014–June 2015) were compared with the drip system (May 2016–June 2017).

Results: Data from 348 bolus days and 338 drip days were analyzed. There was a decrease in interteam variation from 6.2 to 3.9 patients (P < 0.001). There were fewer days with the following: large interteam variation (143 to 25, P < 0.001), days with resident teams at or above capacity (26 to 11, P = 0.01), resident teams below a minimum 7 am census (133 to 18, P < 0.001), and days when additional faculty were pulled for clinical care (61 to 9, P < 0.001). Resident noon conference attendance was unchanged and there was no adverse effect on examination scores or duty hour violations.

Conclusions: Changing from a bolus to a drip model for admissions to inpatient teams resulted in a more even distribution of the workload and a more efficient use of physician resources without negatively affecting resident education.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Schumacher DJ, Frintner MP, Jain A, et al. The 2011 ACGME standards: impact reported by graduating residents on the working and learning environment. Acad Pediatr 2014;14:149–154. 2. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME common program requirements. https://www.acgme.org/What-We-Do/Accreditation/Common-Program-Requirements. Updated February 2017. Accessed October 9, 2018. 3. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Common program requirements. Frequently asked questions: pediatrics. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/FAQ/CommonProgramRequirementsFAQs.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed October 9, 2018. 4. Destino LA, Valentine M, Sheikhi FH, et al. Inpatient hospital factors and resident time with patients and families. Pediatrics 2017;139:e20163011. 5. Kocolas I, Day K, King M, et al. Shift schedules and intern work hours, patient numbers, conference attendance, and sleep at a single pediatric residency program. Acad Pediatr 2016;17:149–152. 6. Thanarajasingam U, McDonald FS, Halvorsen AJ, et al. Service census caps and unit-based admissions: resident workload, conference attendance, duty hour compliance, and patient safety. Mayo Clin Proc 2012;87:320–327. 7. Was A, Blankenberg R, Park KT. Pediatric resident workload intensity and variability. Pediatrics 2016;138:e20154371. 8. Haferbecker D, Fakeye O, Medina SP, et al. Perceptions of educational experience and inpatient workload among pediatric residents. Hosp Pediatr 2013;3:276–284. 9. McMahon GT, Katz JT, Thorndike ME, et al. Evaluation of a redesign initiative in an internal-medicine residency. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1304–1311. 10. Drolet BC, Whittle SB, Khokhar MT, et al. Approval and perceived impact of duty hour regulations: survey of pediatric program directors. Pediatrics 2013;132:819–824. 11. Fieldston ES, Zaoutis LB, Hicks PJ, et al. Front-line ordering clinicians: matching workforce to workload. J Hosp Med 2014;9:457–462. 12. Choi Y, Kim D, Chong H, et al. Use of a 90-minute admission window and front-fill system to reduce work compression on a general medicine inpatient teaching service. J Grad Med Educ 2017;9:245–249. 13. O'Connor AB, Lang VJ, Bordley DR. Restructuring an inpatient resident service to improve outcomes for residents, students, and patients. Acad Med 2011;86:1500–1507. 14. Yarnell CJ, Shadowitz S, Redelmeier DA. Hospital readmissions following physician call system change: a comparison of concentrated and distributed schedules. Am J Med 2016;129:706–714. 15. Szecket N, Wong HJ, Wu RC, et al. Implementation of a continuous admission model reduces the length of stay of patients on an internal medicine clinical teaching unit. J Hosp Med 2012;7:55–59. 16. Swing SR. The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective. Med Teach 2007;29:648–654.