Original Article

Education in Female Sexual Function and Dysfunction among American Urogynecologic Society Members: An Unmet Need

Authors: Sarah A. Ward, MD, Ronald M. Cornely, MPH, Monica Mendiola, MD, Celeste S. Royce, MD, William D. Winkelman, MD, Michele R. Hacker, ScD, Mallika Anand, MD, MS

Abstract

Objectives: Sexual function is an important component of women’s health that has not been traditionally emphasized during medical training, suggesting that further education is needed to provide comprehensive patient care. The purpose of this study was to describe education and interest in female sexual function among urogynecology providers.

Methods: Conducted in 2020, this was a cross-sectional survey of American Urogynecologic Society members assessing educational and clinical experience with female sexual function.

Results: Of 642 members who opened the survey, 123 (19%) completed it. Most of the respondents were fellowship trained (70%), and 74% reported ≥10% of their patients had sexual function questions or concerns unrelated to prolapse or incontinence. Most (71%) of the members strongly agreed/agreed that they were comfortable evaluating and managing these patients. This was more common in providers who saw more patients (≥25%) with sexual function concerns (83%) compared with those who saw <25% (65%; P = 0.04). Most of the respondents reported receiving ≤1 lecture on normal sexual function (82%) or sexual dysfunction (85%) during medical training. Most (67%) would expand their practice if they received additional education. The most requested topics were disorders of desire (72%), orgasm (71%), and arousal (67%). The most common reasons for not expanding practice even with additional education were female sexual function not being of significant interest (30%) and time and interruption of practice flow (28%).

Conclusions: Most of the respondents felt comfortable caring for patients with sexual function concerns, but reported that they would expand their practice with additional education. The majority reported having received ≤1 female sexual function/dysfunction lecture during their medical training. This highlights a critical need and desire for more female sexual function education among the urogynecologic provider population.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Shifren JL, Monz BU, Russo PA, et al. Sexual problems and distress in United States women: prevalence and correlates. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112:970–978.
 
2. Biddle AK, West SL, D’Aloisio AA, et al. Hypoactive sexual desire disorder in postmenopausal women: quality of life and health burden. Value Health 2009;12:763–772.
 
3. Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization. Defining sexual health: report of a technical consultation on sexual health, 28–31 January 2002, Geneva. https://www.paho.org/en#x0026;view=article&#x0026;id=2136:2009-defining-sexual-health&#x0026;Itemid=0&#x0026;lang=en#gsc.tab=0. Published 2006. Accessed September 21, 2023.
 
4. Office of the US Surgeon General, Office of Population Affairs. The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Promote Sexual Health and Responsibly Sexual Behavior. Rockville, MD: Office of the Surgeon General; 2001.
 
5. Rezaee RL, Kingsberg SA. Female sexual function and dysfunction: assessment and treatment. In: Walters MD, Karram MM, eds. Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2015:81–95.
 
6. Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics. APGO medical student educational objectives, 11th edition. https://apgo.org/page/msostudent. Published 2019. Accessed September 22, 2023.
 
7. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The Obstetrics and Gynecology Milestone Project. Chicago: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2015.
 
8. Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Educational Objectives Core Curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12th ed. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2020.
 
9. American Urogynecologic Society Education Committee. Resident learning objectives. https://www.augs.org/assets/1/6/Resident_learning_objectives_(1).pdf. Accessed September 22, 2023.
 
10. American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Qualifying exam preparation. https://www.abog.org/specialty-certification/qualifying-exam/exam-preparation. Accessed February 19, 2021.
 
11. Pancholy AB, Goldenhar L, Fellner AN, et al. Resident education and training in female sexuality: results of a national survey. J Sex Med 2011;8:361–366.
 
12. Pauls RN, Kleeman SD, Segal JL, et al. Practice patterns of physician members of the American Urogynecologic Society regarding female sexual dysfunction: results of a national survey. Int Urogynecol J 2005;16:460–467.
 
13. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Board of Urology. Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Milestones. Chicago: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2022.
 
14. American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021 bulletin for subspecialty certification in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery qualifying exam preparation.https://www.abog.org/docs/default-source/bulletins/2021/fpmrs-2021-bulletin-12-17-2020.pdf. Published 2020. Accessed September 22, 2023.
 
15. American Urogynecologic Society. About us. https://www.augs.org/about/. Accessed August 17, 2022.
 
16. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2001; 42:377–381.