Original Article

Effect of the Adoption of a Comprehensive Electronic Health Record on Graduate Medical Education: Perceptions of Faculty and Trainees

Authors: Jullia A. Rosdahl, MD, PhD, Mariah Rudd, BS, Robert Benjamin, MD, John S. Wiener, MD, Richard Sloane, MPH, Audrey Brown, PSM, W. Robert Lee, MD, MS, David Turner, MD, Rosie Qin, MD, Amber Reck Atwater, MD

Abstract

Objectives: Health systems are adopting electronic health records (EHRs). There are few studies on the effects of EHR implementation on graduate medical education. The authors sought to longitudinally assess perceptions of the impact of EHRs on graduate medical education during implementation and 2 years after implementation.

Methods: A survey was distributed to faculty and trainees during the first year (2013) of adoption of the EHR system. A follow-up survey was distributed 2 years later (2015). The χ2 test was used to compare the quantitative responses, and factor analysis was conducted to identify correlations between items. Free text responses were analyzed qualitatively.

Results: The initial survey (in 2013) included 290 faculty and 106 trainees; the follow-up survey (in 2015) included 353 faculty and 226 trainees. In 2013, respondents had a positive impression of EHRs. During the implementation phase, participants believed that face-to-face teaching was negatively affected (P = 0.001). Faculty believed EHRs had a negative effect on trainees’ ability to take a history/conduct physical examinations (P = 0.002) and to formulate a differential diagnosis/plan independently (P = 0.003). In 2015, faculty opinions of the impact of the EHR remained unchanged; trainee responses were more positive than in 2013 in some areas. Qualitative analysis showed that the most frequent strategies to enhance the educational process were the development of EHR skills and improved chart access and note assistance.

Conclusions: Respondents remain positive about the EHR 2 years after implementation. Faculty remain concerned about its effect on the educational process, whereas residents appear more positive regarding the potential for EHRs to enhance their education.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Stephens MB, Gimbel RW, Pangaro L. Commentary: the RIME/EMR scheme: an educational approach to clinical documentation in electronic medical records. Acad Med 2011;86:11-14.
 
2. Massaro TA. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: I. Impact on organizational culture and behavior. Acad Med 1993;68:20-25.
 
3. Pageler NM, Friedman CP, Longhurst CA. Refocusing medical education in the EMR era. JAMA 2013;310:2249-2250.
 
4. Schenarts PJ, Schenarts KD. Educational impact of the electronic medical record. J Surg Educ 69:105-112.
 
5. Spencer DC, Choi D, English C, et al. The effects of electronic health record implementation on medical student educators. Teach Learn Med 2012;24:106-110.
 
6. Tierney MJ, Pageler NM, Kahana M, et al. Medical education in the electronic medical record (EMR) era: benefits, challenges, and future directions. Acad Med 2013;88:748-752.
 
7. Association of Academic Health Centers. Academic health centers: defined. http://www.aahcdc.org/About/Academic-Health-Centers. Accessed September 19, 2017.
 
8. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. https://apps.acgme.org/ads/Public/Reports/ReportRunReportId=20&ampCurrentYear=2017&ampAcademicYearId=2016. Accessed September 19, 2017.
 
9. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377-381.
 
10. Oxentenko AS, West CP, Popkave C, et al. Time spent on clinical documentation: a survey of internal medicine residents and program directors. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:377-380.
 
11. Hripcsak G, Vawdrey DK, Fred MR, et al. Use of electronic clinical documentation: time spent and team interactions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:112-117.
 
12. O'Donnell HC, Kaushal R, Barrón Y, et al. Physicians' attitudes towards copy and pasting in electronic note writing. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24:63-68.
 
13. Hammond KW, Helbig ST, Benson CC, et al. Are electronic medical records trustworthy? Observations on copying, pasting and duplication. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003;269-373.
 
14. Peled JU, Sagher O, Morrow JB, et al. Do electronic health records help or hinder medical education? PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000069.
 
15. Ware JE, Jr Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-483.
 
16. Decker SL, Jamoom EW, Sisk JE. Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic health record systems. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31:1108-1114.
 
17. Shanafelt TD, Hasan O, Dyrbye LN, et al. Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance in physicians and the general US working population between 2011 and 2014. Mayo Clin Proc 2015;90:1600-1613.
 
18. Allegra CJ, Hall R, Yothers G. Prevalence of burnout in the U.S. oncology community: results of a 2003 survey. J Oncol Pract 2005;1:140-147.