Original Article
Fit Testing Failure of Reprocessed “Duckbill”-Type N95 Masks
Abstract
Objectives: In response to worldwide shortages of N95 masks during the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 pandemic, various strategies have been used. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend several strategies, including simple isolation to reprocessing methods using vaporized hydrogen peroxide to guide reuse of masks up to five times. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) quantitative fit testing was performed after five trials of donning and doffing in one cohort of new masks and two cohorts of repeatedly sterilized “duckbill”-type N95 masks.Methods: One cohort of new masks and two cohorts of sterilized masks were repeatedly subjected to 35% vaporized hydrogen peroxide for either five or 10 cycles. Then, they were subjected to five trials of donning and doffing, with NIOSH quantitative fit testing performed after each wear cycle to assess for any degradation on fit performance caused by sterilization and/or repeated donning and doffing up to the recommended Centers for Disease Control and Prevention limit of five times. All of the fit testing was performed on a single volunteer.
Results: The means and 95% confidence intervals for each cohort and the individual results for each mask within each cohort were reported. A χ2 analysis showed significant differences in percentages of masks that pass fit testing in both recycled mask cohorts.
Conclusions: These data show the variability of NIOSH fit testing results of both new and sterilized masks. The mask recycling program of our partner health systems thus discarded these types of masks due to the variable failure rate. Health systems should consider individual evaluation to inform their overall policies on mask reuse and recycling.
Posted in: Infectious Disease140
Full Article
Having trouble viewing the article content below? Click here to open it directly.
Images
References
1. Moschella P, Liao W, Litwin A, et al. Repeated vaporised hydrogen peroxide disinfection of 3 M1860 N95 mask respirators does not degrade quantitative fit performance. Br J Anaesth 2021;126:e125–e127.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Strategies for optimizing the supply of N95 respirators. https://archive.cdc.gov/#/details?url=https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/respirators-strategy/index.html. Updated September 16, 2021. Accessed August 23, 2021.
3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Interim infection prevention and control recommendations for healthcare personnel during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. https://www.ahrq.gov/nursing-home/resources/interim-recommendations.html. Updated April 2022. Accessed August 23, 2021.
4. Odor PM, Neun M, Bampoe S, et al. Anaesthesia and COVID-19: infection control. Br J Anaesth 2020;125:16–24.
5. Cheng VCC, Wong SC, Yuen KY. Estimating coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk in health care workers. JAMA Network Open 2020;3:e209687.
6. Hinton DM. Emergency use authorization. https://www.fda.gov/media/137762/download. Published January 21, 2021. Accessed August 23, 2021.
7. Viscusi DJ, Bergman MS, Eimer BC, et al. Evaluation of five decontamination methods for filtering facepiece respirators. Ann Occup Hyg 2009;53:815–827.
8. Battelle. Final report for the Bioquell hydrogen peroxide vapor (HPV) decontamination for reuse of N95 respirators. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.nemsma.org/resource/collection/FE0D34CD-9BAB-4E4A-B23B-38E0F0AE344B/Decon_masks_study_2.pdf. Published July 2016. Accessed August 23, 2021.
9. Weinheimer CM, Ellsworth M, Ferguson L, et al. Reprocessing N95s with hydrogen peroxide vaporization: a robust system from collection to dispensing. Am J Infect Control 2021;49:508–511.
10. Maranhao B, Scott AW, Scott AR, et al. Probability of fit failure with reuse of N95 mask respirators. Br J Anaesth 2020;125:e322–e324.
11. Degesys NF, Wang RC, KwanE, etal. Correlation between N95 extended use and reuse and fit failure in an emergency department. JAMA 2020;324:94–96.
